JB/122/112/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/112/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p><head><add> 16 July 1808 </add> <add> + </add> C  <add> Charge 1</add></head> <lb/><add> Charge 1 </add></p><p> [C.] Charges</p> <p><unclear>Proferred</unclear> by Jeremy Bentham of <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>Esquire, in his quality of Accountant, in respect of <del> <gap/> <lb/><del>1. Charge in respect of <gap/> the </del> 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Account of <lb/>£2,000 impressed into his hands, by King's Warrant, dated <lb/>4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of June 1794, to the Commissioners for the <gap/> the Public Accounts <note>against <lb/> Richard Whitcomb Esquire one of the Chief Inspectors acting under the Audit Commissioners, for alleged  misbehaviour in the execution of his Office, in relation to the said Account</note></p> <p> Preliminary Observation. </p> <p>Whatsoever may be the <del> forms of proceeding </del> <add> <del> and </del> </add> rules of <lb/> evidence, in respect of which the <del> provision</del> <add> practice</add> of the <add> Audit </add> Board <lb/>differs from that <gap/> of the Common Law Courts, it is <lb/>impossible for an Accountant to be <sic>appraized</sic> of them, <lb/>but by communication from the Board itself <add> viz. either</add> <del> <Gap/> or the</del> <lb/><add> from the Commissioners directly, or from </add> some officers <del> a </del> <add> by </add> whom <del> the <gap/> of no question of </del><lb/><add> in this behalf </add> the authority of the <del> Court </del> <add> Board </add> is exercised.</p> <p>Saving therefore <del> any special case in <gap/> <gap/> </del> <Add> the case of a suspicion of Fraud </add> <lb/><del> such there be, or <gap/> </del> and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> <add> moreover </add> a case, if any such <lb/>there be, in which a communication of the practice of the <lb/> Court, in the belief in question, would be <add> liable </add> to afford asylum <lb/> to such fraud, it is the duty of every such <unclear>officer</unclear><lb/><del> to explore every favourable occasion of <gap/> </del> <add> in every instance where every need of </add>such information <lb/>presents itself, to afford it , even though unsought; <lb/>much work if <del> expressing might </del> prayed for <add> being particularly needed it be any where </add> in expressions.</p> <p><del> This observation </del> The <del> abo</del> above is an observation <lb/>which it seemed necessary to promise, as <lb/><del> <gap/> </del> <add> finding </add> its application, in more or less <unclear>form,</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> <lb/>the whole series of those charges.  But<del> necessary </del> <add> calling </add> <lb/>for a more pointed application on the occasion of Charge <lb/>the 9<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> and last, it will there <del> be repeated</del> in a <lb/>more complete as well as printed form, ( such repetition<lb/>presenting itself as being on that occasion necessary) be <lb/>repeated. </p>
<head><add> 16 July 1808 </add> <add> + </add> C  <add> Charge 1</add></head>  
<p><add> Charge 1 </add></p><p> [C.] Charges <add> 2 </add></p> <p>Proferred by Jeremy Bentham of Queens Square Place<lb/> <note>(1) <gap/> every Observation</note><lb/>Esquire, in his quality of Accountant, in respect of <del> <gap/> <lb/><del>1. Charge in respect of Article the</del> 4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> Account of <lb/>£2,000 impressed into his hands, by King's Warrant, dated <lb/>4<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> of June 1794, to the Commissioners for the Auditing the Public Accounts <note>against <lb/> Richard Whitcomb Esquire,<lb/> one of the Chief Inspectors <lb/>acting under the authority <lb/>of the said<lb/> Commissioners, <lb/>for alleged  misbehaviour <lb/>in the execution of <lb/>his Office, in relation <lb/>to the said Account</note></p>  
 
<p> Preliminary Observation. </p>  
 
<p>Whatsoever may be the <del> forms of proceeding </del> <add> <del> and </del> </add> rules of <lb/> evidence, in respect of which the <del> provision</del> <add> practice</add> of the <add> Audit </add> Board <lb/>differs from that <gap/> of the Common Law Courts, it is <lb/>impossible for an Accountant to be <sic>appraized</sic> of them, <lb/>but by communication from the Board itself <add> viz. either</add> <del> <Gap/> or the</del> <lb/><add> from the Commissioners directly, or from </add> some officers <del> a </del> <add> by </add> whom <del> the <gap/> of no question of </del><lb/><add> in this behalf </add> the authority of the <del> Court </del> <add> Board </add> is exercised.</p>  
 
<p>Saving therefore <del> any special case in which if any</del> <add> the case of a suspicion of Fraud </add> <lb/><del> such there be, in which </del> and <hi rend="underline">that</hi> <add> moreover </add> a case, if any such <lb/>there be, in which a communication of the practice of the <lb/> Court, in the belief in question, would be <add> liable </add> <del> likely </del>to afford asylum <lb/> to such fraud, it is the duty of every such officer<lb/><del> to explore every favourable occasion of <gap/> </del> <add> in every instance where every need of </add>such information <lb/>presents itself, to afford it , even though unsought; <lb/>much work if <del> expressing might </del> prayed for <add> being particularly needed it be any where </add> in express terms.</p><!-- feint pencil notes bracketed to the first two paragraphs -->
 
<p><note>Qust<hi rend="superscript">n</hi> whether <lb/>to propose to <lb/>Charge - Information <lb/>withholden?</note></p>
 
<p> <note>1<lb/> Preliminary <unclear>Objection</unclear> <lb/>Duty of the Board <lb/>by itself or Officers <lb/>to afford an Accountant <lb/>all necessary information <lb/>unasked - <lb/>much more if asked</note></p>
 
<p><del> This observation </del> The <del> abo</del> above is an observation <lb/>which it seemed necessary to promise, as <lb/><del> necessary </del> <add> finding </add> its application, in more or less <unclear>form,</unclear> <unclear>throw short</unclear> <lb/>the whole series of those charges.  But <del> necessary </del> <add> calling </add> <lb/>for a more pointed application on the occasion of Charge <lb/>the 9<hi rend="superscript">th</hi> and last, it will there <del> be repeated</del> in a <lb/>more complete as well as printed form, ( such repetition<lb/>presenting itself as being on that occasion necessary) be <lb/>repeated. </p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

16 July 1808 + C Charge 1

Charge 1

[C.] Charges 2

Proferred by Jeremy Bentham of Queens Square Place
(1) every Observation
Esquire, in his quality of Accountant, in respect of
1. Charge in respect of Article the
4th Account of
£2,000 impressed into his hands, by King's Warrant, dated
4th of June 1794, to the Commissioners for the Auditing the Public Accounts against
Richard Whitcomb Esquire,
one of the Chief Inspectors
acting under the authority
of the said
Commissioners,
for alleged misbehaviour
in the execution of
his Office, in relation
to the said Account

Preliminary Observation.

Whatsoever may be the forms of proceeding and rules of
evidence, in respect of which the provision practice of the Audit Board
differs from that of the Common Law Courts, it is
impossible for an Accountant to be appraized of them,
but by communication from the Board itself viz. either or the
from the Commissioners directly, or from some officers a by whom the of no question of
in this behalf the authority of the Court Board is exercised.

Saving therefore any special case in which if any the case of a suspicion of Fraud
such there be, in which and that moreover a case, if any such
there be, in which a communication of the practice of the
Court, in the belief in question, would be liable likely to afford asylum
to such fraud, it is the duty of every such officer
to explore every favourable occasion of in every instance where every need of such information
presents itself, to afford it , even though unsought;
much work if expressing might prayed for being particularly needed it be any where in express terms.

Qustn whether
to propose to
Charge - Information
withholden?

1
Preliminary Objection
Duty of the Board
by itself or Officers
to afford an Accountant
all necessary information
unasked -
much more if asked

This observation The abo above is an observation
which it seemed necessary to promise, as
necessary finding its application, in more or less form, throw short
the whole series of those charges. But necessary calling
for a more pointed application on the occasion of Charge
the 9th and last, it will there be repeated in a
more complete as well as printed form, ( such repetition
presenting itself as being on that occasion necessary) be
repeated.




Identifier: | JB/122/112/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

1

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

112

Info in main headings field

Charge 1

Image

001

Titles

Charges

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E2 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in