JB/122/118/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/118/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add> 17 July 1808</add> <add> +</add> <lb/><note>Charge 2 <lb/>2. Article 3 Query 4</note></p> <!-- pencil annotation --><note>3<lb/> The <unclear>miscontent</unclear><lb/> therein - <gap/> <lb/> requisition.</note><lb/><p><del> Instead of then expressing and explaining himself, the <lb/>course taken by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector was to call</del> In a <lb/> dark and peremptory manner, and without any <unclear>word</unclear> of <lb/>explanation, <del> to call of </del> <add> In this </add>requires the production of that <lb/>very document viz. "<hi rend="underline">the receipt</hi>" which <del> the Accountant</del> <add> in the paper lying before him </add> <lb/><del> had</del> <add> he observed the Accountant </add> in the same terms acknowledg<del>ing</del><add>ed</add> to be unproducible.</p> <p><del> Understanding </del> <del>Applying </del> <add>If</add> to the requisition thus <del>presented </del> <add> expressed </add> its <lb/><add> natural and </add> proper import be assessed - <foreign>i.c.</foreign> unless it be supposed <lb/>of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector that on this occasion <del> he was within</del> <add> [+] <del> he had consequent </del> <lb/> <note>[+] either in due <lb/> comprehension of, in a due regard to <lb/>the effect of the words<lb/> employed by him<lb/> was contrary</note> <lb/> <add> <del> knowledge of </del> </add> <del> ignorant <gap/> of his duty, </del> it is not an exercise<lb/>of official duty, but an insult: - <hi rend="underline">The document</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">in question is one which, <del> you have </del> <add> as </add> already acknowledged by</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">you, you have not to produce: thereupon and therefore I</hi><lb/> <hi rend="underline">hereby require you to produce it: viz. that I may</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">enjoy an idea the perplexity into which you <del> <sic>won't</sic> </del><add> can not </add> be</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">plunged, by a requisition to perform <del> <gap/> </del> <add> that which </add> you have acknowledged</hi> <lb/> <hi rend="underline">to be impossible; <del> having </del> and the distress which</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">you can not but feel as the thought of the adverse judgment,</hi> <lb/> <hi rend="underline">which will present itself to your view as the</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">necessary and inevitable consequence.</hi> </p><p> Such is this measuring of the insult, <add>[</add> <del> perplexically </del> <add> explicitly</add> <add>]</add>]<lb/>indeed, but <add> not the less</add> <gap/> and faithfully <del> interpreted</del> <add> <del>developed</del> </add> delineated. </p>
<p> <add> 17 July 1808</add> <add> +</add> <lb/><note>Charge 2 <lb/>2. Article 3 Query 4</note></p> <!-- pencil annotation --><p><note>3<lb/> The <unclear>miscontent</unclear><lb/> therein - <gap/> <lb/> requisition.</note></p>
 
<p><del> Instead of then expressing and explaining himself, the <lb/>course taken by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector was to call</del> In a <lb/> dark and peremptory manner, and without any <unclear>word</unclear> of <lb/>explanation, <del> to call of </del> <add> In this </add>requires the production of that <lb/>very document viz. "<hi rend="underline">the receipt</hi>" which <del> the Accountant</del> <add> in the paper lying before him </add> <lb/><del> had</del> <add> he observed the Accountant </add> in the same terms acknowledg<del>ing</del><add>ed</add> to be unproducible.</p>  
 
<p><del> Understanding </del> <del>Applying </del> <add>If</add> to the requisition thus <del>presented </del> <add> expressed </add> its <lb/><add> natural and </add> proper import be assessed - <foreign>i.c.</foreign> unless it be supposed <lb/>of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector that on this occasion <del> he was within</del> <add> [+] <del> he had consequent </del> <lb/> <note>[+] either in due <lb/> comprehension of, in a due regard to <lb/>the effect of the words<lb/> employed by him<lb/> was contrary</note> <lb/> <add> <del> knowledge of </del> </add> <del> ignorant <gap/> of his duty, </del> it is not an exercise<lb/>of official duty, but an insult: - <hi rend="underline">The document</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">in question is one which, <del> you have </del> <add> as </add> already acknowledged by</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">you, you have not to produce: thereupon and therefore I</hi><lb/> <hi rend="underline">hereby require you to produce it: viz. that I may</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">enjoy an idea the perplexity into which you <del> <sic>won't</sic> </del><add> can not </add> be</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">plunged, by a requisition to perform <del> <gap/> </del> <add> that which </add> you have acknowledged</hi> <lb/> <hi rend="underline">to be impossible; <del> having </del> and the distress which</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">you can not but feel as the thought of the adverse judgment,</hi> <lb/> <hi rend="underline">which will present itself to your view as the</hi> <lb/><hi rend="underline">necessary and inevitable consequence.</hi> </p><p> Such is this measuring of the insult, <add>[</add> <del> perplexically </del> <add> explicitly</add> <add>]</add>]<lb/>indeed, but <add> not the less</add> <gap/> and faithfully <del> interpreted</del> <add> <del>developed</del> </add> delineated. </p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

17 July 1808 +
Charge 2
2. Article 3 Query 4

3
The miscontent
therein -
requisition.

Instead of then expressing and explaining himself, the
course taken by Mr Chief Inspector was to call
In a
dark and peremptory manner, and without any word of
explanation, to call of In this requires the production of that
very document viz. "the receipt" which the Accountant in the paper lying before him
had he observed the Accountant in the same terms acknowledginged to be unproducible.

Understanding Applying If to the requisition thus presented expressed its
natural and proper import be assessed - i.c. unless it be supposed
of Mr Chief Inspector that on this occasion he was within [+] he had consequent
[+] either in due
comprehension of, in a due regard to
the effect of the words
employed by him
was contrary

<add> knowledge of
ignorant of his duty, it is not an exercise
of official duty, but an insult: - The document
in question is one which, you have as already acknowledged by
you, you have not to produce: thereupon and therefore I
hereby require you to produce it: viz. that I may
enjoy an idea the perplexity into which you won't can not be
plunged, by a requisition to perform that which you have acknowledged
to be impossible; having and the distress which
you can not but feel as the thought of the adverse judgment,
which will present itself to your view as the
necessary and inevitable consequence.

Such is this measuring of the insult, [ perplexically explicitly ]]
indeed, but not the less and faithfully interpreted developed delineated.




Identifier: | JB/122/118/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

3

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

118

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E3

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in