★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> <add> 21 July 1808</add> <add> + Charge 9</add> <add>9</add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/>5. Information | <p> <add> 21 July 1808</add> <add> + Charge 9</add> <add>9</add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/>5. Information withholden <lb/> Instance 1 or 2<lb/> 10 or 1<lb/>Accountants perplexity<lb/> <unclear>contrasted</unclear> by reference<lb/> to other Queries <lb/> on similar points.<lb/> viz. those by which <lb/> "fresh acknowledgement<lb/> were implicitly rejected:<lb/> viz.<lb/> 1. The succedaneum<lb/> Invoices sent in for <lb/> Booth & C<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> as <add> among the </add> Vouchers<lb/> in there 2 .. <!-- possibly symbol for 'therefore' --> rejected <lb/> by Query 3.</note></p> | ||
<p> <add> 9 </add> <lb/> <del> To assert</del> <add> In this perplexity, to assert himself in </add> his conjectures, <del> in this perplexity</del> he<lb/>could do no otherwise than refer the other Queries, <lb/><hi rend="underline">two</hi> in number viz N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 3 and N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 4, in order to <lb/>see what sort of countenance was therein <del> manifested </del> <add><sic>shewn</sic></add><lb/> towards such other written evidence <add><del> -wards documents not <gap/> for </del></add> <add><del> written cond</del> </add> as <add> appeared to be </add> <del> were </del> considered <lb/>by <del>the</del> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector as standing in a predicament, <lb/>the <unclear>same</unclear> as that of the proposed "<hi rend="underline">fresh acknowledgement."</hi> <lb/>viz. evidence brought into existence - not at the <add> same </add> time<lb/> with the transaction evidenced by them, but at a subsequent <lb/> and widely distant point of time, viz. a <lb/> time posterior to the delivery of this Account: <del> they being</del> <add> documents </add><lb/><add> <del> evidence</del> necessarily posterior to his Account, as being</add> <del><gap/></del> to be brought into existence, if at all , for the purpose <lb/>of this account: for the purpose of serving in the character <lb/> of evidence in relation to it. </p> | |||
<p><note>Query 3</note> <lb/>1. Turning then <add> in the first place</add> to the Query N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> 3, having for its<lb/>subject this same <hi rend="underline">cast iron,</hi> he observed such <del> as </del> <lb/> recently - created evidence, considered either as <add> altogether </add> inadmissible,<lb/> or as <add> as but </add> unsatisfactory and insufficient: <del> <gap/> </del> <add> such <del> these </del> succedaneous evidences</add> being <lb/>though <del> coming </del> <add> derived </add> from the same <hi rend="underline">source</hi> as the <add> correspondent </add> <hi rend="underline">original</hi> <lb/>evidence, considered by him as is were these <hi rend="underline">"copies"</hi> <lb/>or <hi rend="underline">"species of copies"</hi>, in which supposition, had it <lb/>been true in substance <add> and effect </add> as well as in <unclear>sound</unclear> <add> <del> words </del> </add><lb/>it would unquestionably not <del> fo</del> have been fit to <lb/>be received, <del> at least </del> <add> at any rate, not </add> without special reason. </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
21 July 1808 + Charge 9 9
Charge
5. Information withholden
Instance 1 or 2
10 or 1
Accountants perplexity
contrasted by reference
to other Queries
on similar points.
viz. those by which
"fresh acknowledgement
were implicitly rejected:
viz.
1. The succedaneum
Invoices sent in for
Booth & Co as among the Vouchers
in there 2 .. rejected
by Query 3.
9
To assert In this perplexity, to assert himself in his conjectures, in this perplexity he
could do no otherwise than refer the other Queries,
two in number viz No 3 and No 4, in order to
see what sort of countenance was therein manifested shewn
towards such other written evidence -wards documents not for written cond as appeared to be were considered
by the Mr Chief Inspector as standing in a predicament,
the same as that of the proposed "fresh acknowledgement."
viz. evidence brought into existence - not at the same time
with the transaction evidenced by them, but at a subsequent
and widely distant point of time, viz. a
time posterior to the delivery of this Account: they being documents
evidence necessarily posterior to his Account, as being to be brought into existence, if at all , for the purpose
of this account: for the purpose of serving in the character
of evidence in relation to it.
Query 3
1. Turning then in the first place to the Query No 3, having for its
subject this same cast iron, he observed such as
recently - created evidence, considered either as altogether inadmissible,
or as as but unsatisfactory and insufficient: such these succedaneous evidences being
though coming derived from the same source as the correspondent original
evidence, considered by him as is were these "copies"
or "species of copies", in which supposition, had it
been true in substance and effect as well as in sound words
it would unquestionably not fo have been fit to
be received, at least at any rate, not without special reason.
|
Identifier: | JB/122/147/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-07-21 |
10 or 1 |
||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
147 |
Charge 9 |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D9 / E9 |
||
|
See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7 |
001 |
||
