JB/122/151/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/151/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add> 21 July 1808 </add> <add> + Charge 9th </add> <add> 13 </add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/> 9. Information <sic>withholden</sic><lb/> Query 5. <lb/>16 or 4 <lb/>Advantage taken ny <lb/> such indirect answers<lb/> - above.<lb/> 1. Accountants <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> <lb/> 2. Ch. Inspector's responsibility saved</note></p> <p> <add> 9 </add> <lb/><del> Such order to end at number to <gap/> </del><lb/><del>to the fore <gap/> it <gap/> </p> <p> <del> Supposing </del> <add> In this instance, as well as in the <gap/> preceding ones, supposing</add> the wish and design of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector<lb/><add> to have been </add> to keep the Accountant plunged in <del> a <gap/> </del> <add> <del> <gap/> </del> </add> <add> <del> <gap/> <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> <add> a sink of irremediable </add> perplexity and <add> thus </add> without danger, <del> to </del> in respect of <lb/>reputation of misconduct, to himself, no <sic>inequable</sic> <lb/>course, it is humbly <unclear>conceived</unclear>, could have been <lb/>better adapted <add> to that end </add> than the course thus <add> actually </add> pursued by him.<lb/><del> to that end [ Whether, if obliged to <gap/> himself </del> <lb/> <del>Mr Chief Inspector would or could not put <add> or demand </add> an exclusion </del><lb/> <del> upon </del> . <add> In the </add> <hi rend="underline">fresh acknowledgments,</hi> meaning those, in <lb/><gap/> of <hi rend="underline">the receipts</hi> called for, obtainable and obtained <lb/>from the <del> parties</del> weekly-paid journeymen, designated by <lb/>him (as supposed) in and by the name of "<hi rend="underline">the parties</hi>" &#x2014;<lb/>and in this <add> other </add> evidence which he saw tendered viz. <lb/>the testimony of the two managing men by whom <del> <gap/> </del> <add> they </add> <lb/>payments in those several instances were made - may be <lb/>seen two species of evidence, of which the Accountant <lb/>finds himself <add> under an <add> utter </add> inability of <gap/> satisfying himself, whether</add> <del> unable to prove whether, if obliged </del> <lb/><add> Mr Chief Inspector, if obliged </add> to explain himself, <del> Mr Chief Inspector </del> could or <lb/> would not <add> take upon himself to </add> <gap/> them respectively <hi rend="underline">inadmissible,</hi> <lb/>or <hi rend="underline">insufficient</hi>: and in <add> <del> by </del> </add> this inability <del> <gap/> </del> may <lb/>be seen one of the causes of the perplexity under which <lb/>the Accountant labours.  But as the matter stands <lb/> <del> he </del> <add> Mr Chief Inspector </add> has not in either instance pronounced any direct <lb/>declaration - either of <hi rend="underline">inadmissibility</hi> or of <hi rend="underline">insufficiency</hi>,<lb/> and <del> therefore </del> <add> <del> there</del> thus </add> supressing these declarations<add> in his own eyes [+]<note>[+] ( as in the eyes of the Accountant they certainly are)</note> <gap/> <lb/>unjustifiable, and in that consideration not fit to be <lb/>hazarded, <del> not </del> <add> nor </add> <gap/> of being hazarded, without <del> <gap/> </del> <add> risk </add> <lb/> of unsure <del> <gap/> himself </del> he has <del> not made </del> <add> abstained from making </add> any such declarations <lb/>and thereby has avoided the <del> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> himself </del> <add> exposing himself to censure. </add> </p>
<p> <add> 21 July 1808 </add> <add> + Charge 9th </add> <add> 13 </add> <lb/><note>Charge <lb/> 9. Information <sic>withholden</sic><lb/> Query 5. <lb/>16 or 4 <lb/>Advantage taken by <lb/> such indirect answers<lb/> - above.<lb/> 1. Accountants <gap/> <lb/> <gap/> <lb/> 2. Ch. Inspector's responsibility saved</note></p>  
 
<p> <add> 9 </add> <lb/><del> Such order to end at number to reject <gap/> </del><lb/><del>to the fore <gap/> it <gap/> </del></p>  
 
<p> <del> Supposing </del> <add> In this instance, as well as in the <gap/> preceding ones, supposing</add> the wish and design of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Chief Inspector<lb/><add> to have been </add> to keep the Accountant plunged in <del> a <gap/> </del> <add> <del> <gap/> </del> </add> <add> <del> <gap/> <gap/> </del> </add> <lb/> <add> a sink of irremediable </add> perplexity and <add> thus </add> without danger, <del> to </del> in respect of <lb/>imputation of misconduct, to himself, no <sic>inequable</sic> <lb/>course, it is humbly conceived, could have been <lb/>better adapted <add> to that end </add> than the course thus <add> actually </add> pursued by him.<lb/><del> to that end [ Whether, if obliged to explain himself </del> <lb/> <del>Mr Chief Inspector would or would not put <add> or demand </add> an exclusion </del><lb/> <del> upon </del> . <add> In the </add> <hi rend="underline">fresh acknowledgments,</hi> meaning those, in <lb/>lieu of <hi rend="underline">the receipts</hi> called for, obtainable and obtained <lb/>from the <del> parties</del> weekly-paid journeymen, designated by <lb/>him (as supposed) in and by the name of "<hi rend="underline">the parties</hi>" &#x2014;<lb/>and in this <add> other </add> evidence which he saw tendered viz. <lb/>the testimony of the two managing men by whom <del> these </del> <add> the </add> <lb/>payments in those several instances were made - may be <lb/>seen two species of evidence, of which the Accountant <lb/>finds himself <add> under an <add> utter </add> inability of <del><gap/> </del> satisfying himself, whether</add> <del> unable to prove whether, if obliged </del> <lb/><add> Mr Chief Inspector, if obliged </add> to explain himself, <del> Mr Chief Inspector </del> would or <lb/> would not <add> take upon himself to </add> <gap/> them respectively <hi rend="underline">inadmissible,</hi> <lb/>or <hi rend="underline">insufficient</hi>: and in <add> <del> by </del> </add> this inability <del> <gap/> </del> may <lb/>be seen one of the causes of the perplexity under which <lb/>the Accountant labours.  But as the matter stands <lb/> <del> he </del> <add> Mr Chief Inspector </add> has not in either instance pronounced any direct <lb/>declaration - either of <hi rend="underline">inadmissibility</hi> or of <hi rend="underline">insufficiency</hi>,<lb/> and <del> therefore </del> <add> <del> there</del> thus </add> supressing these declarations<add> in his own eyes [+]<note>[+] ( as in the eyes of the Accountant they certainly are)</note></add> <gap/> <lb/>unjustifiable, and in that consideration not fit to be <lb/>hazarded, <del> not </del> <add> nor </add> <gap/> of being hazarded, without <del> <gap/> </del> <add> risk </add> <lb/> of unsure <del> <gap/> himself </del> he has <del> not made </del> <add> abstained from making </add> any such declarations <lb/>and thereby has avoided the <del> <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> himself </del> <add> exposing himself to censure. </add> </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:32, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

21 July 1808 + Charge 9th 13
Charge
9. Information withholden
Query 5.
16 or 4
Advantage taken by
such indirect answers
- above.
1. Accountants

2. Ch. Inspector's responsibility saved

9
Such order to end at number to reject
to the fore it

Supposing In this instance, as well as in the preceding ones, supposing the wish and design of Mr Chief Inspector
to have been to keep the Accountant plunged in a
a sink of irremediable perplexity and thus without danger, to in respect of
imputation of misconduct, to himself, no inequable
course, it is humbly conceived, could have been
better adapted to that end than the course thus actually pursued by him.
to that end [ Whether, if obliged to explain himself
Mr Chief Inspector would or would not put or demand an exclusion
upon . In the fresh acknowledgments, meaning those, in
lieu of the receipts called for, obtainable and obtained
from the parties weekly-paid journeymen, designated by
him (as supposed) in and by the name of "the parties" —
and in this other evidence which he saw tendered viz.
the testimony of the two managing men by whom these the
payments in those several instances were made - may be
seen two species of evidence, of which the Accountant
finds himself under an <add> utter inability of satisfying himself, whether</add> unable to prove whether, if obliged
Mr Chief Inspector, if obliged to explain himself, Mr Chief Inspector would or
would not take upon himself to them respectively inadmissible,
or insufficient: and in by this inability may
be seen one of the causes of the perplexity under which
the Accountant labours. But as the matter stands
he Mr Chief Inspector has not in either instance pronounced any direct
declaration - either of inadmissibility or of insufficiency,
and therefore there thus supressing these declarations in his own eyes [+][+] ( as in the eyes of the Accountant they certainly are)
unjustifiable, and in that consideration not fit to be
hazarded, not nor of being hazarded, without risk
of unsure himself he has not made abstained from making any such declarations
and thereby has avoided the himself exposing himself to censure.



Identifier: | JB/122/151/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

16 or 4

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

151

Info in main headings field

Charge 9th

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D13

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

See note 3 to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in