★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> <add>13 Aug. 1808</add> <add> + </add> <add> 9 </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements Suggested <lb/>4. Refund not Vouchers</note></p> <p><add> 7 </add> <lb/>What I am contending for, be it observed, is - <lb/> not that <hi rend="underline">Vouchers might not to be impounded</hi> - but <lb/>that neither papers <add> at large </add> transmitted in compliance with <lb/>requisitions thus instructed, nor even papers coming <lb/>strictly under the description of <hi rend="underline">Vouchers</hi> <add> whatever that may be, </add> | <p> <add>13 Aug. 1808</add> <add> + </add> <add> 9 </add> <lb/><note>Arrangements Suggested <lb/>4. Refund not Vouchers</note></p> <p><add> 7 </add> <lb/>What I am contending for, be it observed, is - <lb/> not that <hi rend="underline">Vouchers might not to be impounded</hi> - but <lb/>that neither papers <add> at large </add> transmitted in compliance with <lb/>requisitions thus <unclear>instructed</unclear>, nor even papers coming <lb/>strictly under the description of <hi rend="underline">Vouchers</hi> <add> whatever that may be, </add> ought to be <lb/>impounded <hi rend="underline">without warning</hi>.</p> | ||
<p>The changes <del> with </del> which, in this or that particular <lb/>case, might be the result of a rule prescribing an <lb/>unlimited <Add> and unconditional </add> compliance with every application for the return<lb/>of Voucher, is a danger of which (as appears <lb/> from <del> all </del> <add> the whole tenor of </add> my <del> observation</del> communication on this hand <lb/>I was <add> and am </add> sufficiently aware, and which has an undoubted <lb/>claim to consideration.</p> | |||
<p> But, <del> it may be worth not <gap/> </del> <add> which may at the same time <add>be not </add> altogether undeserving </add> of <lb/>consideration, <add> is - </add> thus, in the <del> <gap/> of </del> <add> <del> <gap/> </del> officers belonging to </add> the Westminster Hall <lb/>Courts, certainly <add> not</add> in general, perhaps not in any one <lb/> instance, has any such position as that of confounding<lb/>written evidence taken place. </p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
13 Aug. 1808 + 9
Arrangements Suggested
4. Refund not Vouchers
7
What I am contending for, be it observed, is -
not that Vouchers might not to be impounded - but
that neither papers at large transmitted in compliance with
requisitions thus instructed, nor even papers coming
strictly under the description of Vouchers whatever that may be, ought to be
impounded without warning.
The changes with which, in this or that particular
case, might be the result of a rule prescribing an
unlimited and unconditional compliance with every application for the return
of Voucher, is a danger of which (as appears
from all the whole tenor of my observation communication on this hand
I was and am sufficiently aware, and which has an undoubted
claim to consideration.
But, it may be worth not which may at the same time <add>be not altogether undeserving </add> of
consideration, is - thus, in the of officers belonging to the Westminster Hall
Courts, certainly not in general, perhaps not in any one
instance, has any such position as that of confounding
written evidence taken place.
|
Identifier: | JB/122/309/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1808-08-13 |
|||
|
122 |
Panopticon |
||
|
309 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D9 / E7 |
||
|
001 |
|||
