JB/122/323/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/323/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add> 28 July 1808</add> <add> A + </add> <add> 4 </add> <lb/> <note>Reasons against Vouchers</note></p> <p> <add> 4 </add> <lb/>Be the above definitions respectively more or less correct, <lb/>viz. with reference to the purpose here in question<lb/>(for no such document as an Invoice happens at present<lb/> to be applicable to <unclear>me</unclear> <del>)</del> <del> which <gap/> <gap/> </del> <add> copies of the <add> individual</add> Invoices in </add> <lb/>question, <add> viz. that which in this occasion if this Account were sent in to the Board </add> not having been preserved) what is certain is <lb/>that in neither instance does the document possess, <lb/><add> for or </add> in respect of the correctness or completeness of the statements<lb/> contained in and <del> <gap/> </del> expressed by it, either of the securities <lb/> respectively afforded by the sanction of an oath <lb/>(including the eventual punishment in case of wilful <lb/>falsehood attached to it) or the scrutiny performed <lb/> by the process <del> of </del> <add> called </add> <hi rend="underline">cross-examination</hi>.</p> <p> In <del> respect </del> <Add> relation </add> to both these species of Vouchers, two <lb/> tendencies, both of them, it is conceived adverse to the <lb/>ends of justice, appear in the occasion in question, to <lb/>have been manifested. </p> <p> One is <del> the tendency </del> through production for <del> the ready <del> <lb/> <del> written species of </del> evidence <add> in the ready written form </add> <del> called a Voucher </del> a tendency <lb/>to <gap/> crude form, and <del> this </del> subject to a virtual exclusion <lb/> evidence, <add> though </add> from the same source, on <del> that </del> <add> those </add> inferior <unclear>Receipts</unclear> <lb/>in which alone, what is regarded as evidence, is ever <lb/> received in an ordinary Court of Justice: viz. 1 testimony <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> obtained either in the oral or the epistolary mode <lb/> and at any rate <del> under </del> <add> upon </add> oath, and <del> with </del> subject to cross-examination: <lb/> 2. affidavit evidence, which though not <lb/>subject to cross examination, has for its security against wilful<lb/> falsehood the sanction of an oath. </p>  
<p> <add> 28 July 1808</add> <add> A + </add> <add> 4 </add> <lb/> <note>Reasons against Vouchers</note></p>  
 
<p> <add> 4 </add> <lb/>Be the above definitions respectively more or less correct, <lb/>viz. with reference to the purpose here in question<lb/>(for no such document as an Invoice happens at present<lb/> to be accessible to me <del>)</del> <del> which <gap/> <gap/> </del> <add> copies of the <add> individual</add> Invoices in </add> <lb/>question, <add> viz. that which in this occasion if this Account were sent in to the Board </add> not having been preserved) what is certain is <lb/>that in neither instance does the document possess, <lb/><add> for or </add> in respect of the correctness or completeness of the statements<lb/> contained in and <del> <gap/> </del> expressed by it, either of the securities <lb/> respectively afforded by the sanction of an oath <lb/>(including the eventual punishment in case of wilful <lb/>falsehood attached to it) or the scrutiny performed <lb/> by the process <del> of </del> <add> called </add> <hi rend="underline">cross-examination</hi>.</p>  
 
<p> In <del> respect </del> <add> relation </add> to both these species of Vouchers, two <lb/> tendencies, both of them, it is conceived adverse to the <lb/>ends of justice, appear in the occasion in question, to <lb/>have been manifested. </p>  
 
<p> One is <del> the tendency </del> through production for <del> the ready <del> <lb/> <del> written species of </del> evidence <add> in the ready written form </add> <del> called a Voucher </del> a tendency <lb/>to <gap/> crude form, and <del> this </del> subject to a virtual exclusion <lb/> evidence, <add> though </add> from the same source, on <del> that </del> <add> those </add> inferior <unclear>Receipts</unclear> <lb/>in which alone, what is regarded as evidence, is ever <lb/> received in an ordinary Court of Justice: viz. 1 testimony <lb/> <del> <gap/> </del> obtained either in the oral or the epistolary mode <lb/> and at any rate <del> under </del> <add> upon </add> oath, and <del> with </del> subject to cross-examination: <lb/> 2. affidavit evidence, which though not <lb/>subject to cross examination, has for its security against wilful<lb/> falsehood the sanction of an oath. </p>  






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:33, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

28 July 1808 A + 4
Reasons against Vouchers

4
Be the above definitions respectively more or less correct,
viz. with reference to the purpose here in question
(for no such document as an Invoice happens at present
to be accessible to me ) which copies of the <add> individual Invoices in </add>
question, viz. that which in this occasion if this Account were sent in to the Board not having been preserved) what is certain is
that in neither instance does the document possess,
for or in respect of the correctness or completeness of the statements
contained in and expressed by it, either of the securities
respectively afforded by the sanction of an oath
(including the eventual punishment in case of wilful
falsehood attached to it) or the scrutiny performed
by the process of called cross-examination.

In respect relation to both these species of Vouchers, two
tendencies, both of them, it is conceived adverse to the
ends of justice, appear in the occasion in question, to
have been manifested.

One is the tendency through production for the ready
written species of
evidence in the ready written form called a Voucher a tendency
to crude form, and this subject to a virtual exclusion
evidence, though from the same source, on that those inferior Receipts
in which alone, what is regarded as evidence, is ever
received in an ordinary Court of Justice: viz. 1 testimony
obtained either in the oral or the epistolary mode
and at any rate under upon oath, and with subject to cross-examination:
2. affidavit evidence, which though not
subject to cross examination, has for its security against wilful
falsehood the sanction of an oath.




Identifier: | JB/122/323/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

323

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D4 / E4

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

See note to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in