JB/122/326/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/326/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add> 20 July 1808</add> <add> + </add> <add> 7 </add> <lb/><note>Vouchers not the best <lb/> evidence</note></p><p> <add> 7 </add> <lb/> What the Accountant is well aware of, is - that, <lb/>for the <del> r</del> admission of evidence <del> <gap/> </del> in a shape comparatively <lb/>so untrustworthy <add> <del> unsatisfactory</del> </add>, the Commissioners have a sufficient <lb/> warrant  in the express words of an Act of Parliament <lb/> <add> + </add> and that, in the tenor of the Act, so it happens, <note>+ 25.G.3.C.52. ff.23</note><lb/><del> <unclear>that</unclear></del> the words "<hi rend="underline">a written voucher</hi>" <unclear>stand</unclear> <hi rend="underline">before</hi> the words <lb/>"<hi rend="underline">in other evidence.</hi>"  </p> <p> But that in comparison of evidence <add> presented </add> in that <lb/>shape, to which <del> bent</del> Jury trial is indebted for so large <lb/>a portion of <del> its <gap/> popularity</del> <add> the attachment <add> so justly </add> <add>manifested to it </add> evidence <del>of </del> in <lb/>so <del> manifest</del> <add> obvious </add> a degree expand to <del> fro </del> be tainted with <lb/><add> undiscoverable</add> fraud and falsehood, should be regarded with an eye <lb/>of <hi rend="underline">preference</hi>, is what neither law ordains, nor common <lb/> sense <gap/> evidence. </p> <p> <del> I have sent </del> On such a day I sent (says <lb/>the <sic>signer</sic> of the <hi rend="underline">Invoice</hi>) in such or such a person, <lb/><add> by such or such a conveyance</add> such or such goods.  When perhaps to <del>that</del> <add>the <del> p</del></add> person <lb/>in question, he never sent, on that or any other day <lb/>by that or any other <del> <gap/> </del> conveyance, these or any other <lb/>goods. </p> <p> On such a day <del> <gap/> </del>(says the <sic>signer</sic> of the<lb/> <hi rend="underline">receipt</hi>) I received, of such or such a person, such <lb/>and such sums of money, in such or such an account. <lb/>when perhaps, from the person in question, he never received,<lb/> on that or any other day, or that or any other <lb/>account, any sum of money: unless <add> as not any: </add> it were <del> the </del> <lb/> <del> money that may have <add> was </add> have been giving him </del> <add> money, given to him perhaps </add> for the part thus <lb/>born by him, in the fabrication of this document, which to <lb/><del> all the characters of falsehood <add> may have </add> <gap/> </del> all the "<hi rend="underline">characters of Vouchers</hi>"  whatever they <lb/> may be. <!-- pointing finger symbol. text continues at right angles --><lb/> <add> may have united <add> <del> and with well grounded </del> and without danger to the parties, is suspicion on the part of the auditor,</add>  all the characters of fraud: <del> and falsehood</del> :<lb/> no walls to prevent the falsehood: no cross examination, to bring it to light, <add> and permit the deception arrived at by it,</add> if <unclear>ventured</unclear> in.</p>
<p> <add> 20 July 1808</add> <add> + </add> <add> 7 </add> <lb/><note>Vouchers not the best <lb/> evidence</note></p>
 
<p> <add> 7 </add> <lb/> What the Accountant is well aware of, is - that, <lb/>for the <del> r</del> admission of evidence <del> <gap/> </del> in a shape comparatively <lb/>so untrustworthy <add> <del> unsatisfactory</del> </add>, the Commissioners have a sufficient <lb/> warrant  in the express words of an Act of Parliament <lb/> <add> + </add> and that, in the tenor of the Act, so it happens, <note>+ 25.G.3.C.52. ff.23</note><lb/><del> <unclear>that</unclear></del> the words "<hi rend="underline">a written voucher</hi>" stand <hi rend="underline">before</hi> the words <lb/>"<hi rend="underline">in other evidence.</hi>"  </p>  
 
<p> But that in comparison of evidence <add> presented </add> in that <lb/>shape, to which <del> bent</del> Jury trial is indebted for so large <lb/>a portion of <del> its <gap/> popularity</del> <add> the attachment <add> so justly </add> <add>manifested to it </add> evidence <del>of </del> in <lb/>so <del> manifest</del> <add> obvious </add> a degree expand to <del> fro </del> be tainted with <lb/><add> undiscoverable</add> fraud and falsehood, should be regarded with an eye <lb/>of <hi rend="underline">preference</hi>, is what neither law ordains, nor common <lb/> sense <gap/> evidence. </p>  
 
<p> <del> I have sent </del> On such a day I sent (says <lb/>the <sic>signer</sic> of the <hi rend="underline">Invoice</hi>) in such or such a person, <lb/><add> by such or such a conveyance</add> such or such goods.  When perhaps to <del>that</del> <add>the <del> p</del></add> person <lb/>in question, he never sent, on that or any other day <lb/>by that or any other <del> course </del> conveyance, these or any other <lb/>goods. </p>  
 
<p> On such a day <del> <gap/> </del>(says the <sic>signer</sic> of the<lb/> <hi rend="underline">receipt</hi>) I received, of such or such a person, such <lb/>and such sums of money, in such or such an account. <lb/>when perhaps, from the person in question, he never received,<lb/> on that or any other day, or that or any other <lb/>account, any sum of money: unless <add> as not any: </add> it were <del> the </del> <lb/> <del> money that may have <add> was </add> have been giving him </del> <add> money, given to him perhaps </add> for the part thus <lb/>born by him, in the fabrication of this document, which to <lb/><del> all the characters of falsehood <add> may have </add> inserted </del> all the "<hi rend="underline">characters of Vouchers</hi>"  whatever they <lb/> may be. <!-- pointing finger symbol. text continues at right angles --><lb/> <add> may have united <add> <del> and with well grounded </del> and without danger to the parties, is suspicion on the part of the auditor,</add>  all the characters of fraud: <del> and falsehood</del> :<lb/> no walls to prevent the falsehood: no cross examination, to bring it to light, <add> and permit the deception arrived at by it,</add> if ventured in.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:33, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

20 July 1808 + 7
Vouchers not the best
evidence

7
What the Accountant is well aware of, is - that,
for the r admission of evidence in a shape comparatively
so untrustworthy unsatisfactory , the Commissioners have a sufficient
warrant in the express words of an Act of Parliament
+ and that, in the tenor of the Act, so it happens, + 25.G.3.C.52. ff.23
that the words "a written voucher" stand before the words
"in other evidence."

But that in comparison of evidence presented in that
shape, to which bent Jury trial is indebted for so large
a portion of its popularity the attachment <add> so justly manifested to it evidence of in
so manifest obvious a degree expand to fro be tainted with
undiscoverable fraud and falsehood, should be regarded with an eye
of preference, is what neither law ordains, nor common
sense evidence.

I have sent On such a day I sent (says
the signer of the Invoice) in such or such a person,
by such or such a conveyance such or such goods. When perhaps to that the p person
in question, he never sent, on that or any other day
by that or any other course conveyance, these or any other
goods.

On such a day (says the signer of the
receipt) I received, of such or such a person, such
and such sums of money, in such or such an account.
when perhaps, from the person in question, he never received,
on that or any other day, or that or any other
account, any sum of money: unless as not any: it were the
money that may have was have been giving him money, given to him perhaps for the part thus
born by him, in the fabrication of this document, which to
all the characters of falsehood may have inserted all the "characters of Vouchers" whatever they
may be.
may have united <add> and with well grounded and without danger to the parties, is suspicion on the part of the auditor, all the characters of fraud: and falsehood :
no walls to prevent the falsehood: no cross examination, to bring it to light, and permit the deception arrived at by it, if ventured in.



Identifier: | JB/122/326/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1808-07-20

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

326

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D7 / E7

Penner

Watermarks

TH 1806

Marginals

Paper Producer

Andre Morellet

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1806

Notes public

See note to letter 1986, vol. 7

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in