JB/122/347/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/122/347/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> 28 June 1813 </p><p> Expte Bentham - before the Arbitrators<lb/> <add>Mess<hi rend="superscript">rs</hi> Wishaw &amp; <unclear>Hullrelk</unclear> <sic>bet<hi rend="superscript">wn</hi></sic> the hours of 9 &amp; 11 at <lb/>Mr Wishaws Chambers </add> </p> <p>At the conclusion of <del> the </del> Lloyds Examination <lb/>it was asked what further witnesses were <lb/> to be examined &amp; when they would be ready <lb/> to attend - and it was observed <add> by the Arbitrators and by the gentlemen attending on behalf of the Treasury </add> that it<lb/> was impossible within the time limited <lb/>to go fully into the case - </p> <p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Cooke then said that M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham had <lb/> much better make some <sic>perposition</sic> to <lb/> the Treasury - that the sum he had demanded <hi rend="superscript">+</hi><note>+ The observation thereupon made by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Roe on <lb/> behalf of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham was that the sum <del> mentioned</del></note><lb/> was so enormous that there was no <lb/> dealing with it - but if some reasonable <lb/> sum were mentioned it would be for the <lb/> Treasury to consider whether they would <lb/> admit it, and if not and they proposed <lb/> some lesser sum which M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham <lb/> declined to accept then it might be for <lb/> the Arbitrators to decide upon the difference. </p>   
<p> 28 June 1813 </p>
 
<p> Expte Bentham - before the Arbitrators<lb/> <add>Mess<hi rend="superscript">rs</hi> Wishaw &amp; <unclear>Hullrelk</unclear> <sic>bet<hi rend="superscript">wn</hi></sic> the hours of 9 &amp; 11 at <lb/>Mr Wishaws Chambers </add> </p> <p>At the conclusion of <del> the </del> Lloyds Examination <lb/>it was asked what further witnesses were <lb/> to be examined &amp; when they would be ready <lb/> to attend - and it was observed <add> by the Arbitrators and by the gentlemen attending on behalf of the Treasury </add> that it<lb/> was impossible within the time limited <lb/>to go fully into the case - </p>  
 
<p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Cooke then said that M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham had <lb/> much better make some <sic>perposition</sic> to <lb/> the Treasury - that the sum he had demanded <hi rend="superscript">+</hi><note>+ The observation thereupon made by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Roe on <lb/> behalf of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham was that the sum <del> mentioned</del></note><lb/> was so enormous that there was no <lb/> dealing with it - but if some reasonable <lb/> sum were mentioned it would be for the <lb/> Treasury to consider whether they would <lb/> admit it, and if not and they proposed <lb/> some lesser sum which M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham <lb/> declined to accept then it might be for <lb/> the Arbitrators to decide upon the difference. </p>   
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:33, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

28 June 1813

Expte Bentham - before the Arbitrators
Messrs Wishaw & Hullrelk betwn the hours of 9 & 11 at
Mr Wishaws Chambers

At the conclusion of the Lloyds Examination
it was asked what further witnesses were
to be examined & when they would be ready
to attend - and it was observed by the Arbitrators and by the gentlemen attending on behalf of the Treasury that it
was impossible within the time limited
to go fully into the case -

Mr Cooke then said that Mr Bentham had
much better make some perposition to
the Treasury - that the sum he had demanded ++ The observation thereupon made by Mr Roe on
behalf of Mr Bentham was that the sum mentioned

was so enormous that there was no
dealing with it - but if some reasonable
sum were mentioned it would be for the
Treasury to consider whether they would
admit it, and if not and they proposed
some lesser sum which Mr Bentham
declined to accept then it might be for
the Arbitrators to decide upon the difference.


Identifier: | JB/122/347/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

1813-06-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

347

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Collectanea

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

FINE COPY 1810

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1810

Notes public

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in