JB/122/514/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/122/514/002: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> <add>54</add>  <add>§.7. (18) +</add><lb/>5. Observation.  true it is, that, for the existence of the superiority<lb/>of profit thus inferred, the Reverend witness required (it should seem) <lb/>in the character of a condition, that the regulations should be <lb/>"judicious": <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> judicious, <add> viz. </add> I presume in an <hi rend="underline">ordinary</hi> degree, and with <lb/>reference to the particular object on <hi rend="underline">that</hi> occasion in question, viz <lb/>pecuniary profit.  With relation to this particular object, in the <lb/>whole of that Gentleman's Evidence, nothing will, I believe, be found, from <lb/>which any opinion to the prejudice of my title to the refutation of <lb/>being in possession of this ordinary degree of judgement, will appear<lb/>capable of being inferred.  That the plan, so highly and deliberately <lb/>approved of by the late Mr <hi rend="underline">Pitt</hi> and the late <hi rend="underline">Lord Melville,</hi> has <lb/>not been fortunate enough to obtain a favourable place in the <lb/>opinion of this Reverend gentleman, is indeed but too manifest.<lb/>But, it is by the supposition of it's not being sufficiently subservient<lb/>to the interests of the prisoners, and <hi rend="underline">not</hi> by any such apprehension <lb/>as that of a deficiency on my part, in respect of the capacity of taking <lb/>and pursuing such arrangements as promise to be in an ordinary degree<lb/>conducive to a man's own particular interest, that the unfavourable<lb/>impression which I have so much cause to regret, appears to have <lb/>been produced.</p><p>6. of the above mentioned £1 " 15<hi rend="superscript">s</hi> <hi rend="underline">a part</hi> would, <lb/>according to the expectation, declared, as above, by Sir George <lb/>Paul, be probably supplied from the <hi rend="underline">other</hi> source mentioned by him - <lb/>viz, "<hi rend="underline">the labour of the prisoners</hi>." But, of <hi rend="underline">this</hi> part of the expectation <lb/>I waive taking any advantage.</p> <p> 7.  Thus then, in the case of <hi rend="underline">this</hi> rate of profit, stands the <lb/>Estimate.</p> <P> 1.  Supposing the <hi rend="underline">whole <sic>expence</sic> </hi> of the concern defrayed by the <hi rend="underline">earnings</hi> <lb/>of the prisoners, the <hi rend="underline">annual profit</hi> (as per Sir George Paul) would be <lb/>equal to the whole amount of the <hi rend="underline">allowance money,</hi> viz. £12.000.</p> <p> <add> 2. But</add> </p>
<p> <add>54</add>  <add>§.7. (18) +</add><lb/>5. Observation.  True it is, that, for the existence of the superiority<lb/>of profit thus inferred, the Reverend witness required (it should seem) <lb/>in the character of a condition, that the regulations should be <lb/><note>+ Penitentiary Report 30 May 1811. p.41</note><lb/>"judicious": <hi rend="superscript">+</hi> judicious, <add> viz. </add> I presume in an <hi rend="underline">ordinary</hi> degree, and with <lb/>reference to the particular object on <hi rend="underline">that</hi> occasion in question, viz <lb/>pecuniary profit.  With relation to this particular object, in the <lb/>whole of that Gentleman's Evidence, nothing will, I believe, be found, from <lb/>which any opinion to the prejudice of my title to the reputation of <lb/>being in possession of this ordinary degree of judgement, will appear<lb/>capable of being inferred.  That the plan, so highly and deliberately <lb/>approved of by the Late Mr <hi rend="underline">Pitt</hi> and the Late <hi rend="underline">Lord Melville,</hi> has <lb/>not been fortunate enough to obtain a favourable place in the <lb/>opinion of this Reverend gentleman, is indeed but too manifest.<lb/>But, it is by the supposition of it's not being sufficiently subservient<lb/>to the interest of the prisoners, and <hi rend="underline">not</hi> by any such apprehension <lb/>as that of a deficiency on my part, in respect of the capacity of taking <lb/>and pursuing such arrangements as promise to be in an ordinary degree<lb/>conducive to a man's own particular interest, that the unfavourable<lb/>impression which I have so much cause to regret, appears to have <lb/>been produced.</p><p>6. Of the above mentioned £1 " 15<hi rend="superscript">s</hi>, <hi rend="underline">a part</hi> would, <lb/>according to the expectation, declared, as above, by Sir George <lb/>Paul, be probably supplied from the <hi rend="underline">other</hi> source mentioned by him - <lb/>viz, "<hi rend="underline">the labour of the prisoners</hi>." But, of <hi rend="underline">this</hi> part of the expectation <lb/>I waive taking any advantage.</p> <p> 7.  Thus then, in the case of <hi rend="underline">this</hi> rate of profit, stands the <lb/>Estimate.</p> <P> 1.  Supposing the <hi rend="underline">whole <sic>expence</sic> </hi> of the concern defrayed by the <hi rend="underline">earnings</hi> <lb/>of the prisoners, the <hi rend="underline">annual profit</hi> (as per Sir George Paul) would be <lb/>equal to the whole amount of the <hi rend="underline">allowance money,</hi> viz. £12.000.</p> <p> <add> 2. But</add> </p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:33, 4 February 2020

'Click Here To Edit

54 §.7. (18) +
5. Observation. True it is, that, for the existence of the superiority
of profit thus inferred, the Reverend witness required (it should seem)
in the character of a condition, that the regulations should be
+ Penitentiary Report 30 May 1811. p.41
"judicious": + judicious, viz. I presume in an ordinary degree, and with
reference to the particular object on that occasion in question, viz
pecuniary profit. With relation to this particular object, in the
whole of that Gentleman's Evidence, nothing will, I believe, be found, from
which any opinion to the prejudice of my title to the reputation of
being in possession of this ordinary degree of judgement, will appear
capable of being inferred. That the plan, so highly and deliberately
approved of by the Late Mr Pitt and the Late Lord Melville, has
not been fortunate enough to obtain a favourable place in the
opinion of this Reverend gentleman, is indeed but too manifest.
But, it is by the supposition of it's not being sufficiently subservient
to the interest of the prisoners, and not by any such apprehension
as that of a deficiency on my part, in respect of the capacity of taking
and pursuing such arrangements as promise to be in an ordinary degree
conducive to a man's own particular interest, that the unfavourable
impression which I have so much cause to regret, appears to have
been produced.

6. Of the above mentioned £1 " 15s, a part would,
according to the expectation, declared, as above, by Sir George
Paul, be probably supplied from the other source mentioned by him -
viz, "the labour of the prisoners." But, of this part of the expectation
I waive taking any advantage.

7. Thus then, in the case of this rate of profit, stands the
Estimate.

1. Supposing the whole expence of the concern defrayed by the earnings
of the prisoners, the annual profit (as per Sir George Paul) would be
equal to the whole amount of the allowance money, viz. £12.000.

2. But



Identifier: | JB/122/514/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 122.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

122

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

514

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F53 / F54

Penner

Watermarks

JOHN DICKINSON & Co 1809

Marginals

Paper Producer

A. Levy

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1809

Notes public

ID Number

002

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in