JB/123/118/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/123/118/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
<add>to have taken place, a</add> circumstance that suggest no inconsiderable doubt<lb/>
<add>to have taken place, a</add> circumstance that suggest no inconsiderable doubt<lb/>
concerning the probability of their <add>engaging</add> <del>prosecuting upon</del><lb/>
concerning the probability of their <add>engaging</add> <del>prosecuting upon</del><lb/>
the legislature <add>how will<add>soever <del><gap/></del></add></add><add><del>howsoever</del> inclined,</add> to come in to <del>there for</del> <add>the</add> supposed<lb/>
the legislature <add>how well soever <del><gap/></del></add> <add><del>howsoever</del> inclined,</add> to come in to <del>there for</del> <add>the</add> supposed<lb/>
joint plan of improvement, is the existence of<lb/>
joint plan of improvement, is the existence of<lb/>
the ruinous Poor House above mentioned, <add>the situation of which renders it</add> <del>in or</del><lb/>
the ruinous Poor House above mentioned, <add>the situation of which renders it</add> <del>in or</del><lb/>
<del>spot</del> preclusive, <add>while it stands such</add> comprehensive plan. For<lb/>
<del>spot</del> preclusive, <add>while it stands such</add> comprehensive plan. For<lb/>
though, <del>for the accomplishment of a public purpose</del><lb/>
though, <del>for the accomplishment of a public purpose</del><lb/>
government may display<add><del>exercise</del></add> its powers in the<lb/>
government may display<add> <del>exercise</del></add> its powers in the<lb/>
removal of such an impediment, <add>for a great national purpose [+]</add> <del>yet whether</del> <note><add>[+]</add> it does not seem by<lb/>
removal of such an impediment, <add>for a great national purpose [+]</add> <del>yet whether</del> <note><add>[+]</add> it does not seem by<lb/>
any means to follow<lb/>
any means to follow<lb/>
Line 39: Line 39:
<del>for the accommodation of parties applying an the <add><gap/></add></del><lb/>
<del>for the accommodation of parties applying an the <add><gap/></add></del><lb/>
<add><del>on the ground of private bodies particular</del> interest </add> <del>character of individuals with no other pl<gap/> than</del><lb/>
<add><del>on the ground of private bodies particular</del> interest </add> <del>character of individuals with no other pl<gap/> than</del><lb/>
<add><del>that of</del></add> <del>a small portion of pecuniary benefit</del><add><del>advantage</del><add><del>gain</del></add></add>, rendered <lb/>
<add><del>that of</del></add> <del>a small portion of pecuniary benefit</del> <add><del>advantage</del>/<del>gain</del></add>, rendered <lb/>
almost imperceptible, <add>as far as the Parishes are concerned at least, </add> by the multitude of the <lb/>
almost imperceptible, <add>as far as the Parishes are concerned at least, </add> by the multitude of the <lb/>
sharers. The possession in question, in as<lb/>
sharers. The possession in question, in as<lb/>
far as it pretends to independency, was, <add>it is true</add> according<lb/>
far as it pretends to independency, was, <add>it is true</add> according<lb/>
to every appearance founded originally<lb/>
to every appearance founded originally<lb/>
on usurpation. But even in strictness of law<lb/>
on usurpation. But even in strictness of law<lb/>
there is a period <del>at <gap/></del> and that perhaps in<lb/>
there is a period <del>at <gap/></del> and that perhaps in<lb/>
the instance in question not very far distant,<lb/>
the instance in question not very far distant,<lb/>
Line 51: Line 51:
be considered as much stronger, when opposed to<lb/>
be considered as much stronger, when opposed to<lb/>
adversaries, <add>whose application <del>government</del> would be</add> <del>applying to the legislature</del> for favour<lb/>
adversaries, <add>whose application <del>government</del> would be</add> <del>applying to the legislature</del> for favour<lb/>
not <del>to the</del><add>for</add> justice. <del>in the ground of right.</del></p>
not <del>to the</del> <add>for</add> justice. <del>in the ground of right.</del></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:34, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Reason

6. Supposing even perfect co-operation
on the pa between the now, so long disagreeing contending parties
to have taken place, a circumstance that suggest no inconsiderable doubt
concerning the probability of their engaging prosecuting upon
the legislature how well soever howsoever inclined, to come in to there for the supposed
joint plan of improvement, is the existence of
the ruinous Poor House above mentioned, the situation of which renders it in or
spot preclusive, while it stands such comprehensive plan. For
though, for the accomplishment of a public purpose
government may display exercise its powers in the
removal of such an impediment, for a great national purpose [+] yet whether [+] it does not seem by
any means to follow
that it would exercise
an equal stretch of
power to the disturbing
of the separate existing possession & comforts
of a determinate assemblage
of individuals to no
higher and for the sake
of no greater benefit
than that of
to no higher purpose
than the opening producing
an accession of adverse
opening a new source
of expectant gain to
parties for the benefit
of particular partiesinterests
a new source of expected
gain, which supposing
it realized, would be
rendered

for the accommodation of parties applying an the
on the ground of private bodies particular interest character of individuals with no other pl than
that of a small portion of pecuniary benefit advantage/gain, rendered
almost imperceptible, as far as the Parishes are concerned at least, by the multitude of the
sharers. The possession in question, in as
far as it pretends to independency, was, it is true according
to every appearance founded originally
on usurpation. But even in strictness of law
there is a period at and that perhaps in
the instance in question not very far distant,
at which usurpation becomes converted into a
right: and the hold, it can not be doubted, would
be considered as much stronger, when opposed to
adversaries, whose application government would be applying to the legislature for favour
not to the for justice. in the ground of right.



Identifier: | JB/123/118/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

123

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

118

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

41544

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in