JB/135/029/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/029/002: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>EUCLID</head>
<head>EUCLID</head>
<p><note>That may be found<lb/>
<note>LI Prop. 8</note>
 
<note>This may be found<lb/>
better without than<lb/>
better without than<lb/>
with a diagram</note> From <add>the same</add> <gap/> point are drawn <add>different right</add> two lines one to<lb/>
with a diagram.</note>
one point, another to another</p>
 
<p>a right line is the shortest that can be drawn <lb/>
<p>From <gap/> <add>the same</add> point are drawn two <add>different right</add> lines one to<lb/>
between any two points</p>
one point, another to another<lb/>
<p>If any <del>other</del><add>a</add> right lines <add>are once more</add> <del>use</del> drawn from<lb/>
a right line is the shortest that can be drawn<lb/>
the <add>first point </add> <del>point in question</del> to the 2 others, they must<lb/>
between any two points.</p>
<p>If then any <del>other</del> <add>2</add> right lines <add>are once more</add> <del>use</del> drawn from<lb/>
the <add>first point</add> <del>point in question</del> to the 2 others, they must<lb/>
be either the same with the two others<lb/>
be either the same with the two others<lb/>
or different</p>
or different.</p>
<p>If they are the same they dont come under<lb/>
<p>If they are the same they don't come under<lb/>
the point of the proposition which is <unclear>predicated</unclear><lb/>
the terms of the proposition which is predicated<lb/>
of such as are different</p>
of such as are different.</p>
 
<p><del>They are either</del> <add><del>must <gap/></del></add><lb/>
<p><del>They are <del>either</del><add>must state</add></del><lb/>
taken together they must either be greater<lb/>
taken together they must either be greater<lb/>
than the first or less or equal<lb/>
than the two first or less or equal.<lb/>
If taken together they are greater than one<lb/>
If taken together they are greater than one<lb/>
at least if not both, must be greater &amp; so<lb/>
at least if not both, must be greater &amp; so<lb/>
<note>[+] to the corresponding<lb/>
each is not equal <note>to the corresponding<lb/>
one of the other.</note> each is not equal:<add>[+]</add> if taken together they<lb/>
one of the other</note>: if taken together they<lb/>
are <del><gap/></del> less, than one at least if not both<lb/>
are <del>of</del> less, than one at least if not both<lb/>
must be less, &amp; so in this case to, each<lb/>
must be less, &amp; so in this case too, each<lb/>
is not equal.</p>
is not equal.</p>
<p>If taken together they are equal with the two.<lb/>
corresponding ones <add>taken</add> together, they must coincide<lb/>
with them.</p>


<p>If taken together they are equal with the two<lb/>
<head><!-- Red ink -->CLASSIFICATION</head>
<p>This Proposition may serve as an example to <lb/>
<add><sic>shew</sic></add> prove that the order of demonstration is not the<lb/>
same with the order of invention.</p> 
<p>It seems as if the Author had gotten some <lb/>
inexplicit notion of the truth of it in the <lb/>
ways I have been mentioning: but that which he <lb/>
has used happen'd to be the first method that <lb/>
occurred to him of proving it <hi rend="underline">against</hi> <lb/>
a gainsayer.</p>
<p>[+] to the several parts that are to be considered<lb/>
names are given according to the <lb/>
Ordinary method of Notation, it is included <lb/>
in 3 boundaries <add>to</add> one of these boundaries is given <lb/>
the name of A to another B to the remaining one <lb/>
C. to the whole triangle thus included the <lb/>
complex name ABC.</p><pb/>
<p><del>Having then</del> <add><del>The Appellatives</del></add> Upon precisely<lb/>
this footing that is the footing of <hi rend="underline">Proper names</hi> <lb/>
stand those <hi rend="underline">Appellatives</hi> which in the ordinary <lb/>
method of notation in use in Geometry <lb/>
are applied to denote any figure or part <lb/>
of a figure <add>upon</add> which i<del>s drawn</del> the demonstration <lb/>
is exemplified.  The Proposition <add>we will say</add> conceives <lb/>
Triangles {<del>Triangles</del> <add>we will say</add> <del>are the subject of the</del><lb/>
<del>Proposition</del>} a Triangle is drawn<add>[+]</add> This <lb/>
Triangle the moment it is drawn is <lb/>
of a particular sort of Triangle it <lb/>
is either <add>an</add> equilateral triangle an <lb/>
Isosceles or a scalene <add>not only so</add> it is <del>that</del> an <lb/>
Individual <add>one</add> <del>triangle which is drawn</del><lb/>
it is that Individual triangle which is <lb/>
drawn. Of what is it then that these <lb/>
letters are expressive? <add><del><unclear>preparatively</unclear></del></add> the Individual <lb/>
lines which are its boundaries <add>together</add>. <del>Of the</del><lb/>
<del>Individual space included between these</del> <lb/>
lines either the <gap/> of those lines <del>be</del> situated <lb/>
as they are so as to bound that whole <add>individual</add> triangle <lb/>
or as we may say <del>the whole</del> area of that triangle <lb/>
or else the Area itself <add>that is</add> so bounded.</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
<note>[+] Sad consequence<lb/>
would accrue from<lb/>
the diagrams, but<lb/>
this seems a difficult<lb/>
matter to effect<lb/>
is it not better<lb/>
to leave the <unclear>felon</unclear><lb/>
at large with liberty<lb/>
to spare his figure<lb/>
himself keeping only<lb/>
within the bounds<lb/>
of the genus specified.</note><lb/>


<note>L I Prop. 8 </note> corresponding ones<add><del>taken</del></add> together, they must coincide<lb/>
<note><!-- In yellow ink -->o See +</note><lb/>
with them.</p>
 
CLASSIFICATION This proposition may serve as an example to shew prove that the order of demonstration is not the same with the order of invention.  It seems as if the Author had gotten some inexplicit notion of the truth os it in the ways I have been mentioning: but that which he has used happen'd to be the first method that occurred to him of proving it against a gainsayer. [+] to the several parts that are to be considered names are given according to the Ordinary method of Notation, it is included in 3 boundaries to one of these boundaries is given the name of A to another B to the remaoning one C. to the whole triangle thus included the complex name ABC,
 
 
 
 


<note>See Geometry<lb/>
N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi> I</note><lb/>
<p>This <add>Individual</add> triangle we will suppose is of the sort <lb/>
which is called equilateral. and</p>
<p>Let us suppose that <del>the proportion in</del><lb/>
<del>question manner that the</del> it has been <lb/>
demonstrated that its 3 angles are <lb/>
equal to two right ones. <del><gap/></del> the Scholar <lb/>
we will supposed perfectly convinced of the <lb/>
truth of it but <del>at the end of</del> the demonstration <lb/>
<add>perhaps concludes thus</add> <del>are these words</del> therefore the 3 <lb/>
angles of <hi rend="underline">all</hi> triangles are equal to <del><gap/></del><lb/>
2 right ones. at this he is staggered <lb/>
and it costs him much pain to be able <lb/>
to convince himself <del>of</del> that the proposition <lb/>
would hold good of all under the  Genus <lb/>
of triangles.  Euclid does not take pains <lb/>
enough to make his <sic>Scolar</sic> consider the <lb/>
figure he gives as example only and to <lb/>
convince them of the truth of the Proof. <lb/>
with respect to all figures of the Genus <lb/>
he gives. <del>It may be said that</del> if the <lb/>
Scholar were sufficiently apprised always <gap/> <lb/>
the figure in question as an example only no<add>[+]</add>
</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit EUCLID LI Prop. 8

This may be found
better without than
with a diagram.

From the same point are drawn two different right lines one to
one point, another to another
a right line is the shortest that can be drawn
between any two points.

If then any other 2 right lines are once more use drawn from
the first point point in question to the 2 others, they must
be either the same with the two others
or different.

If they are the same they don't come under
the terms of the proposition which is predicated
of such as are different.

They are either must
taken together they must either be greater
than the two first or less or equal.
If taken together they are greater than one
at least if not both, must be greater & so
each is not equal to the corresponding
one of the other
: if taken together they
are of less, than one at least if not both
must be less, & so in this case too, each
is not equal.

If taken together they are equal with the two.
corresponding ones taken together, they must coincide
with them.

CLASSIFICATION

This Proposition may serve as an example to
shew prove that the order of demonstration is not the
same with the order of invention.

It seems as if the Author had gotten some
inexplicit notion of the truth of it in the
ways I have been mentioning: but that which he
has used happen'd to be the first method that
occurred to him of proving it against
a gainsayer.

[+] to the several parts that are to be considered
names are given according to the
Ordinary method of Notation, it is included
in 3 boundaries to one of these boundaries is given
the name of A to another B to the remaining one
C. to the whole triangle thus included the
complex name ABC.


---page break---

Having then The Appellatives Upon precisely
this footing that is the footing of Proper names
stand those Appellatives which in the ordinary
method of notation in use in Geometry
are applied to denote any figure or part
of a figure upon which is drawn the demonstration
is exemplified. The Proposition we will say conceives
Triangles {Triangles we will say are the subject of the
Proposition} a Triangle is drawn[+] This
Triangle the moment it is drawn is
of a particular sort of Triangle it
is either an equilateral triangle an
Isosceles or a scalene not only so it is that an
Individual one triangle which is drawn
it is that Individual triangle which is
drawn. Of what is it then that these
letters are expressive? preparatively the Individual
lines which are its boundaries together. Of the
Individual space included between these
lines either the of those lines be situated
as they are so as to bound that whole individual triangle
or as we may say the whole area of that triangle
or else the Area itself that is so bounded.


---page break---
[+] Sad consequence
would accrue from
the diagrams, but
this seems a difficult
matter to effect
is it not better
to leave the felon
at large with liberty
to spare his figure
himself keeping only
within the bounds
of the genus specified.

o See +

See Geometry
No I

This Individual triangle we will suppose is of the sort
which is called equilateral. and

Let us suppose that the proportion in
question manner that the it has been
demonstrated that its 3 angles are
equal to two right ones. the Scholar
we will supposed perfectly convinced of the
truth of it but at the end of the demonstration
perhaps concludes thus are these words therefore the 3
angles of all triangles are equal to
2 right ones. at this he is staggered
and it costs him much pain to be able
to convince himself of that the proposition
would hold good of all under the Genus
of triangles. Euclid does not take pains
enough to make his Scolar consider the
figure he gives as example only and to
convince them of the truth of the Proof.
with respect to all figures of the Genus
he gives. It may be said that if the
Scholar were sufficiently apprised always
the figure in question as an example only no[+]


Identifier: | JB/135/029/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

135

Main Headings

Folio number

029

Info in main headings field

euclid

Image

002

Titles

classification

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

sir samuel bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [with crown] [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

sir samuel bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46147

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in