★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/135/049/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/135/049/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Conduct</head> | |||
' | <p>At first I did not understand <add><gap/> <gap/> when I <gap/></add> that the 5<hi rend="superscript">th</hi><lb/> | ||
Definition was intended to serve as a<lb/> | |||
Criterion of similar Proposition, <del><gap/> and <gap/></del><lb/> | |||
but as I could not say what it was it <unclear>mean</unclear><lb/> | |||
what meaning might be <unclear>coveted</unclear> under such<lb/> | |||
obscure terms, it might be as well such<lb/> | |||
a Criterion as anything else. but tho' I doubted <lb/> | |||
whether that might not contain <hi rend="italic">some </hi>Criterion,<lb/> | |||
I <unclear>know</unclear> it did not contain that <unclear>which</unclear> I had used upon any occasions I had had<lb/> | |||
to discover similar Proposition. I assumed<lb/> | |||
4 quantities 2 pairs, and narrowly<lb/> | |||
watched <del>my</del> the operations I myself and<lb/> | |||
the steps I took to discover if the one<lb/> | |||
<gap/> was in the same proposistion<lb/> | |||
as the other. <add>by</add> doing this observation, I<lb/> | |||
preceived that it was neither more nor<lb/> | |||
less than the dividing each pairs as<lb/> | |||
per <unclear>defin</unclear>: this then I found to be<lb/> | |||
the <del>first I</del> criterion I had made use<lb/> | |||
of upon this <add>one</add> occasion. my <gap/> care <add><gap/></add><lb/> | |||
was to observe [discover] [if I made use<lb/> | |||
of the same] <add>[what]</add> test upon other occasions. I<lb/> | |||
found it was the same. Not satisfied with</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Conduct
At first I did not understand when I that the 5th
Definition was intended to serve as a
Criterion of similar Proposition, and
but as I could not say what it was it mean
what meaning might be coveted under such
obscure terms, it might be as well such
a Criterion as anything else. but tho' I doubted
whether that might not contain some Criterion,
I know it did not contain that which I had used upon any occasions I had had
to discover similar Proposition. I assumed
4 quantities 2 pairs, and narrowly
watched my the operations I myself and
the steps I took to discover if the one
was in the same proposistion
as the other. by doing this observation, I
preceived that it was neither more nor
less than the dividing each pairs as
per defin: this then I found to be
the first I criterion I had made use
of upon this one occasion. my care
was to observe [discover] [if I made use
of the same] [what] test upon other occasions. I
found it was the same. Not satisfied with
|
Identifier: | JB/135/049/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
135 |
|||
|
049 |
conduct |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
f13 / f14 / f15 / f16 |
||
|
sir samuel bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]] |
||
|
46167 |
|||
