★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
to exist <add>in the subject</add> that the second property can <hi rend="underline">be <sic>shewn</sic></hi> to exist<lb/> | to exist <add>in the subject</add> that the second property can <hi rend="underline">be <sic>shewn</sic></hi> to exist<lb/> | ||
in the same subject. It is not that the property<lb/> | in the same subject. It is not that the property<lb/> | ||
A <hi rend="underline">first</hi> existed | A <hi rend="underline">first</hi> existed, and then <hi rend="underline">because</hi> it <hi rend="underline">existed</hi>, property<lb/> | ||
B came to <hi rend="underline">exist afterwards</hi>, but that property A was<lb/> | B came to <hi rend="underline">exist afterwards</hi>, but that property A was<lb/> | ||
first declared to exist is the thing in question ([ that is the<lb/> | first declared to exist is the thing in question ([ that is the<lb/> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<p>A circle that it which has a line in it such &c<lb/> | <p>A circle that it which has a line in it such &c<lb/> | ||
A circle that which is described by a line &c<lb/> | A circle that which is described by a line &c.<lb/> | ||
Either of them equally capable of <add>being attributed to the</add> (standing for) the definition<lb/> | Either of them equally capable of <add>being attributed to the thing in question in</add> (standing for) the definition<lb/> | ||
Sid Qu. You may perceive (for it is true) that every<lb/> | <foreign>Sid Qu</foreign>. You may perceive (for it is true) that every<lb/> | ||
<add>figure</add> thing which is generated so has that property; but you<lb/> | <add>figure</add> thing which is generated so has that property; but you<lb/> | ||
can not for it is not true that every thing that has<lb/> | can not, for it is not true that every thing that has<lb/> | ||
that property is generated so: all you can prove is that<lb/> | that property is generated so: all you can prove is that<lb/> | ||
it may be generated so.</p> | it <hi rend="underline">may</hi> be generated so.</p> | ||
<note>Bodies by virtue<lb/> | <note>Bodies by virtue<lb/> | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
certain regular<lb/> | certain regular<lb/> | ||
forms but such<lb/> | forms but such<lb/> | ||
figures are generated<lb/> | |||
very differently from<lb/> | very differently from<lb/> | ||
Euclid's method.</note> <p>All <add>the</add> proporties of a figure may perhaps be <unclear>shewn</unclear> to follow<lb/> | Euclid's method.</note> <lb/> | ||
<p>All <add>the</add> proporties of a figure may perhaps be <unclear>shewn</unclear> to follow<lb/> | |||
from it's being generated in particular manner. But<lb/> | from it's being generated in particular manner. But<lb/> | ||
it's having been generated in a particular manner | it's having been generated in a particular manner cannot<lb/> | ||
be shewn <del>from</del> to follow from it's having any of | be shewn <del>from</del> to follow from it's having any of these<lb/> | ||
properties. There may be other ways whereby a figure may<lb/> | properties. There may be other ways whereby a figure may<lb/> | ||
have been made to possess these properties without having<lb/> | have been made to possess these properties without having<lb/> | ||
| Line 52: | Line 53: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
of property A makes no difference. It is not that
It is not that one property flows from the other property,
but that it is by means of a things possessing
the one of these properties you can shew it to possess
the other.
It is not thatbecause the first property exists in certain things that the 2d
property exists in the same things [in which the first
does] but because the first property can be shewn
to exist in the subject that the second property can be shewn to exist
in the same subject. It is not that the property
A first existed, and then because it existed, property
B came to exist afterwards, but that property A was
first declared to exist is the thing in question ([ that is the
name in question was declared to be given to all these things
in which property A should be found) and that then afterwards
property B came to be seen to exist in
them.
A circle that it which has a line in it such &c
A circle that which is described by a line &c.
Either of them equally capable of being attributed to the thing in question in (standing for) the definition
Sid Qu. You may perceive (for it is true) that every
figure thing which is generated so has that property; but you
can not, for it is not true that every thing that has
that property is generated so: all you can prove is that
it may be generated so.
Bodies by virtue
of Chemical Attraction
assume
certain regular
forms but such
figures are generated
very differently from
Euclid's method.
All the proporties of a figure may perhaps be shewn to follow
from it's being generated in particular manner. But
it's having been generated in a particular manner cannot
be shewn from to follow from it's having any of these
properties. There may be other ways whereby a figure may
have been made to possess these properties without having
been generated in this particular manner. And what is it in this means
go case that is meant by generation?
|
Identifier: | JB/135/059/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
135 |
|||
|
059 |
geom. |
||
|
003 |
|||
|
copy/fair copy sheet |
4 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
sir samuel bentham |
[[watermarks::[gr with crown] [pro patria motif]]] |
||
|
46177 |
|||
