JB/135/106/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/106/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 7: Line 7:
II Morphoscopic<lb/>
II Morphoscopic<lb/>
S. Medium of Demonstration <gap/><lb/>
S. Medium of Demonstration <gap/><lb/>
Euclide Vol. 1</note><lb/>
Euclid Vol. 1</note><lb/>


<gap/> Superseeded this page but co
<p><gap/> Superseeded this page but consultable</p>


<p>In a word, for giving a <del><gap/></del> distant and correct <add><del><gap/></del></add> <gap/><lb/>
<p>In a word, for giving a <del><gap/></del> distant and correct <add><del><gap/></del></add> <gap/><lb/>
say notice as any conception of the angle, th<gap/> as two ways,<lb/>
say notice as any conception of the angle, <unclear>there are</unclear> two ways,<lb/>
and no more than <gap/> one is - by means of a re<gap/>curve:<lb/>
and no more than <gap/> one is - by means of a <unclear>recurrent</unclear> curve:<lb/>
on a plan surface, that is to say a circle: the other is by means<lb/>
on a plan surface, that is to say a circle: the other is by means<lb/>
of two right lines end  of these of <gap/> length</p>
of two right lines end  of these of determinate length</p>


<p>First as to the circle the way in which this figure is <gap/><lb/>
<p>First as to the circle, the way in which this figure is <unclear>one</unclear><lb/>
as the instrument of ch<gap/>, a say <gap/> or assertions<lb/>
as the instrument of designation, a say <unclear>determination</unclear> or assertions<lb/>
is the only way in use, and is <del>be for</del> the most <unclear>considerably</unclear><lb/>
is the only way in use, and is <del>be for</del> the most <unclear>considerably</unclear><lb/>
for the most <gap/> of the two.</p>
for the most <gap/> of the two.</p>
Line 32: Line 32:
<gap/>tory of that same surface? namely the recurrently sum<lb/>
<gap/>tory of that same surface? namely the recurrently sum<lb/>
have designated by the appellation of the circumference? <gap/>, by<lb/>
have designated by the appellation of the circumference? <gap/>, by<lb/>
the direct <hi rend="underline">circumfere</hi>nce the surface has <gap/> by any part, or any<lb/>
the word <hi rend="underline">circumfere</hi>nce the surface has <gap/> by any part, or any<lb/>
occasion be meant to be despatched, is clean enough, but that by<lb/>
occasion be meant to be despatched, is clear enough, but that by<lb/>
the word <hi rend="underline">circle</hi> sometimes the <add>whole</add> surface, sometimes no more the<lb/>
the word <hi rend="underline">circle</hi> sometimes the <add>whole</add> surface, sometimes no more the<lb/>
its ban<gap/> been namely the circumference has been designated,<lb/>
its ban<gap/> been namely the circumference has been designated,<lb/>
seems to be but <gap/> <gap/>at.</p>
seems to be but <unclear>too short</unclear>.</p>


<p>The other mode is this. You take two right lines: and<lb/>
<p>The other mode is this. You take two right lines: and<lb/>
Line 53: Line 53:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:35, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1831 May 21
Posology ult
II Morphoscopic
S. Medium of Demonstration
Euclid Vol. 1

Superseeded this page but consultable

In a word, for giving a distant and correct
say notice as any conception of the angle, there are two ways,
and no more than one is - by means of a recurrent curve:
on a plan surface, that is to say a circle: the other is by means
of two right lines end of these of determinate length

First as to the circle, the way in which this figure is one
as the instrument of designation, a say determination or assertions
is the only way in use, and is be for the most considerably
for the most of the two.

But here in, indication of or reference to the which morphoscopes
has of oligomorphics to render it intelligible. In
speaking of a circle, and connecting it as , the number
of parts into which it has been connected as directed, is universally
360

But what, by the bye, is it that is as being there
directed? It is the entire surface, as it is nothing more than
tory of that same surface? namely the recurrently sum
have designated by the appellation of the circumference? , by
the word circumference the surface has by any part, or any
occasion be meant to be despatched, is clear enough, but that by
the word circle sometimes the whole surface, sometimes no more the
its ban been namely the circumference has been designated,
seems to be but too short.

The other mode is this. You take two right lines: and
make suppose them of the same length as ifif two different lengths, of lengths
which one is a determinate purported to in . You
then to meet inin end of each at the same point + + Go on, and see
whether this mode
will do?






Identifier: | JB/135/106/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-05-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d8

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

"superseded this page but consultable"

ID Number

46224

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in