JB/135/160/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/160/001: Difference between revisions

Phil.fawcet (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
<note>Euclids Imperfections</note>
<note>Euclids Imperfections</note>


<p><gap/> to give expression to your angle, you take any <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<p>If, to give expression to your angle, you take any <del><gap/></del><lb/>
greater number of those parts, you have then in<gap/> a <del><hi rend="underline">wedge</hi></del> <hi rend="underline">wedge</hi><lb/>
greater number of those parts, you have then indeed a <del><hi rend="underline">wedge</hi></del> <hi rend="underline">wedge</hi><lb/>
but your wedge has a different boundary, a boundary constituted <note>by the remainder<lb/>
but your wedge has a different boundary, a boundary constituted <note>by the remainder<lb/>
of the circle: the<lb/>
of the circle: the<lb/>
arc of it having<lb/>
area of it having<lb/>
for its boundaries the<lb/>
for its boundaries the<lb/>
two other sides of<lb/>
two other sides of<lb/>
Line 28: Line 28:
which your circle is <del><gap/></del> <add>considered</add> as divided</p>
which your circle is <del><gap/></del> <add>considered</add> as divided</p>


<p>Note <unclear>for those</unclear> for conveying a clear and correct<lb/>
<p>Note here that for conveying a clear and correct<lb/>
conception of an <hi rend="underline">angle</hi>, a right line will be better<lb/>
conception of an <hi rend="underline">angle</hi>, a right line will be better<lb/>
adapted than a curve line: for by <add>the idea</add> a <hi rend="underline">curve</hi> line, the mind<lb/>
adapted than a curve line: for by <add>the idea</add> a <hi rend="underline">curve</hi> line, the mind<lb/>
Line 34: Line 34:
borne by the different species of curves, to one another,<lb/>
borne by the different species of curves, to one another,<lb/>
and to a right line: and, for this, the <del><gap/></del> wedge, the<lb/>
and to a right line: and, for this, the <del><gap/></del> wedge, the<lb/>
base of which is a c<gap/> <del><gap/></del> <add>portion</add> of the <hi rend="underline">inscribed</hi> polygon,<lb/>
base of which is a correspondent <del><gap/></del> <add>portion</add> of the <hi rend="underline">inscribed</hi> polygon,<lb/>
or the wedge which is the basis of <add>the correspondent portion of a</add> circumscribed<lb/>
or the wedge which is the basis of <add>the correspondent portion of a</add> circumscribed<lb/>
polygon may, either of them, serve. This <gap/>, you<lb/>
polygon may, either of them, serve. This done, you<lb/>
have a right lined triangle, off which [in <del>the case, the <gap/></del> <add>this case <del>the</del> of the inscribed</add><lb/>
have a right lined triangle, of which [in <del>the case, the <gap/></del> <add>this case <del>the</del> of the inscribed</add><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">wedge</hi> or say <hi rend="underline">sector</hi>,] the base is the <hi rend="underline">secant</hi> of the circle,<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">wedge</hi> or say <hi rend="underline">sector</hi>,] the base is the <hi rend="underline">secant</hi> of the circle,<lb/>
and the two sides the line by the meeting of which at the <del><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></del> <add>ends</add><lb/>
and the two sides the line by the meeting of which at the <del><hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi></del> <add>ends</add><lb/>
<del>a triangle &#x2014; an isosceles triangle</del> <add>species of triangle &#x2014; namely that called an isosceles triangle</add> &#x2014; is formed.</p>
<del>a triangle &#x2014; an isosceles triangle</del> <add>species of triangle &#x2014; namely that called an isosceles triangle</add> &#x2014; is formed.</p>


<p>Note however that though the <hi rend="underline">sector</hi> is then <gap/>,<lb/>
<p>Note however that though the <hi rend="underline">section</hi> is thus inappropriately,<lb/>
denominated, the <hi rend="underline">secant</hi> is <del><gap/></del> <unclear>apparently</unclear><lb/>
denominated, the <hi rend="underline">secant</hi> is <del><gap/></del> appropriately<lb/>
d<gap/>:: for by it the circle is actually <hi rend="underline">cut</hi>,<lb/>
denominated: for by it the circle is actually <hi rend="underline">cut</hi>,<lb/>
<add>[+]</add> <del>Take a Chester cheese <gap/></del><lb/>
<add>[+]</add> <del>Take a <unclear>Chester cheese</unclear></del><lb/>
<note><add>[+]</add> The form of a<lb/>
<note><add>[+]</add> The form of a<lb/>
<unclear>Chestern</unclear> cheese<lb/>
<unclear>Chester cheese</unclear><lb/>
is <del>the</del> an exemplification<lb/>
is <del>the</del> an exemplification<lb/>
of <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>that <del><gap/></del> of</add><lb/>
of <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>that <del><gap/></del> of</add><lb/>
Line 56: Line 56:
angles to the upper <add>circular</add> surface of the cylinder, in such manner<lb/>
angles to the upper <add>circular</add> surface of the cylinder, in such manner<lb/>
as to cut through the cheese in that same direction with<lb/>
as to cut through the cheese in that same direction with<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the line which the knife has <unclear>drawn</unclear> in that <del><gap/></del> <gap/> surface<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> the line which the knife has drawn on that <del><gap/></del> same surface<lb/>
is a secant of that circle: and is likewise the line<lb/>
is a secant of that circle: and is likewise the line<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del> <unclear>direction</unclear> <del>at the <gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> bottom of the cylinder<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del> described <del>at the <gap/></del> <gap/> <gap/> bottom of the cylinder<lb/>
in the place at which <del><gap/></del> that same <gap/> has been cut through.</p>
in the place at which <del><gap/></del> that same bottom has been cut through.</p>


<p>"Of <add>To</add> this" same circular <gap/>. <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>give</add> legs<lb/>
<p>Of <add>To</add> this same isosceles triangle <del><gap/> <gap/></del> <add>gives</add> legs<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> or lay on them which would terminate in a first stay<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> as long as those which would terminate in a <sic>fixt</sic> stay<lb/>
you give <del><gap/></del> increase <del><gap/></del> to your <hi rend="underline">triangle</hi> &#x2014; increase<lb/>
you give <del><gap/></del> increase <del><gap/></del> to your <hi rend="underline">triangle</hi> &#x2014; increase<lb/>
in exact proportion to their length; but you give an increase<lb/>
in exact proportion to their length; but you give an increase<lb/>
Line 70: Line 70:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1831 Nov. 22

Posology

Euclids Imperfections

If, to give expression to your angle, you take any
greater number of those parts, you have then indeed a wedge wedge
but your wedge has a different boundary, a boundary constituted by the remainder
of the circle: the
area of it having
for its boundaries the
two other sides of
the lines which formed
the boundaries of
your first wedge.

The circle being thus divided into 360 parts; the
number of these parts contained in that the circle that
bounds your angle is the number of degrees spoken of as contained
in that same angle: for example an angle of 45 degrees
is an angle the two constituent sides of which
terminate respectively in 45 out of the 360 degrees into
which your circle is considered as divided

Note here that for conveying a clear and correct
conception of an angle, a right line will be better
adapted than a curve line: for by the idea a curve line, the mind
is led to a complicated description on the subject of the relation
borne by the different species of curves, to one another,
and to a right line: and, for this, the wedge, the
base of which is a correspondent portion of the inscribed polygon,
or the wedge which is the basis of the correspondent portion of a circumscribed
polygon may, either of them, serve. This done, you
have a right lined triangle, of which [in the case, the this case the of the inscribed
wedge or say sector,] the base is the secant of the circle,
and the two sides the line by the meeting of which at the ends
a triangle — an isosceles triangle species of triangle — namely that called an isosceles triangle — is formed.

Note however that though the section is thus inappropriately,
denominated, the secant is appropriately
denominated: for by it the circle is actually cut,
[+] Take a Chester cheese
[+] The form of a
Chester cheese
is the an exemplification
of that of
solid species of solid called a cylinder.
Take one of these
cylinders &

apply a knife to it at right
angles to the upper circular surface of the cylinder, in such manner
as to cut through the cheese in that same direction with
the line which the knife has drawn on that same surface
is a secant of that circle: and is likewise the line
described at the bottom of the cylinder
in the place at which that same bottom has been cut through.

Of To this same isosceles triangle gives legs
as long as those which would terminate in a fixt stay
you give increase to your triangle — increase
in exact proportion to their length; but you give an increase
to your angle




Identifier: | JB/135/160/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1831-11-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

160

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46278

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in