JB/135/287/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/135/287/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1820 May 31.<lb/>
Posology</head>


<note>Theoretic<lb/>
Ch. Origin of the idea<lb/>
109</note>
<p>Question. 1 Of the two <add>three</add> subjects of posology, numbers and figures<lb/>
<add>and motions</add> <del>is</del> from which are our earliest ideas derived</p>
<p>Answer. Numbers</p>
<p>Quest 2 From whence are our <add>first and earliest</add> ideas of number derived?</p>
<p>Answer. From our hands and fingers Monstrosities excepted, every<lb/>
human being is born with two hands and five fingers on each hand, the<lb/>
thumb being reckoned for one: total number on both hands ten fingers<lb/>
Hence in most languages there are <add>distinct</add> names for the different numbers<lb/>
up to ten exclusive <unclear>Art</unclear> is inclusive. From or after ten, in forming<lb/>
the names of the succeeding numbers, the names of the first series of<lb/>
numbers are repeated</p>
<p>Question 3. Is that the case in every nation?</p>
<p>Ans. No: In some savage <add>barbarous</add> nations of <add>Western</add> Africa the series of<lb/>
numbers goes on no further than five: after <unclear>which</unclear> in the formation<lb/>
of the next series those of the first are repeated.<add>+</add></p>
<note><add>+</add> Bowditch &#9758; Then<lb/>
go on to speak of<lb/>
the <hi rend="underline">visible signs</hi> of the<lb/>
numbers, in Roman<lb/>
Greek &amp; Arabic</note>
<p>Qu. Since every human <add>being</add> has feet as well as hands, and as<lb/>
many toes on his feet as hands upon his fingers, <del><gap/> <gap/> in<lb/>
total his fingers</del> his toes being in French called by no other names<lb/>
than the fingers of his feet, how comes it that in the first series<lb/>
of numbers, there are not twenty simple names instead<lb/>
of ten?</p>
<p>Answer. Only because, <del>the</del> in counting, the feet with their<lb/>
toes, are not so <add>nearby and</add> obviously present to the eyes, as the hands with<lb/>
their fingers.</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 May 31.
Posology

Theoretic
Ch. Origin of the idea
109

Question. 1 Of the two three subjects of posology, numbers and figures
and motions is from which are our earliest ideas derived

Answer. Numbers

Quest 2 From whence are our first and earliest ideas of number derived?

Answer. From our hands and fingers Monstrosities excepted, every
human being is born with two hands and five fingers on each hand, the
thumb being reckoned for one: total number on both hands ten fingers
Hence in most languages there are distinct names for the different numbers
up to ten exclusive Art is inclusive. From or after ten, in forming
the names of the succeeding numbers, the names of the first series of
numbers are repeated

Question 3. Is that the case in every nation?

Ans. No: In some savage barbarous nations of Western Africa the series of
numbers goes on no further than five: after which in the formation
of the next series those of the first are repeated.+

+ Bowditch ☞ Then
go on to speak of
the visible signs of the
numbers, in Roman
Greek & Arabic

Qu. Since every human being has feet as well as hands, and as
many toes on his feet as hands upon his fingers, in
total his fingers
his toes being in French called by no other names
than the fingers of his feet, how comes it that in the first series
of numbers, there are not twenty simple names instead
of ten?

Answer. Only because, the in counting, the feet with their
toes, are not so nearby and obviously present to the eyes, as the hands with
their fingers.



Identifier: | JB/135/287/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135.

Date_1

1820-05-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

135

Main Headings

posology

Folio number

287

Info in main headings field

posology

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

g100

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::i&m [prince of wales feathers] 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

46405

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in