★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
<p>A notion hitherto prevalent among the cultivators of the<lb/> | <p>A notion hitherto prevalent among the cultivators of the<lb/> | ||
field of posology is — that <hi rend="underline">form</hi>, in certain of its modifications,<lb/> | field of posology is — that <hi rend="underline">form</hi>, in certain of its modifications,<lb/> | ||
is a being existing by itself <add>or at | is a being existing by itself <add>or at least capable of existing</add> just as a body is a being existing<lb/> | ||
by itself</p> | by itself</p> | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
solid <hi rend="underline">is</hi>.</note> | solid <hi rend="underline">is</hi>.</note> | ||
<p>On this supposition accordingly is every doctrine | <p>On this supposition accordingly is every doctrine contained in<lb/> | ||
the work <sic>stiled</sic> the Elements of Geometry the work of Euclid, the<lb/> | the work <sic>stiled</sic> the Elements of Geometry the work of Euclid, the<lb/> | ||
father of the <add>that art and</add> science | father of the <add>that art and</add> science grounded; for a line <hi rend="underline">is</hi> (he says) so and so<lb/> | ||
a surface <hi rend="underline"><add>is</add></hi> (he says) so and so — [a solid <hi rend="underline"><add>is</add></hi> (he says) so and so]</p> | a surface <hi rend="underline"><add>is</add></hi> (he says) so and so — [a solid <hi rend="underline"><add>is</add></hi> (he says) so and so]</p> | ||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
<p><del>Among the</del> So true is this that whether what belongs to<lb/> | <p><del>Among the</del> So true is this that whether what belongs to<lb/> | ||
quantity has or has not an existence independent <del><gap/></del> of the<lb/> | quantity has or has not an existence independent <del><gap/></del> of the<lb/> | ||
existence of body has | existence of body has among the learned been a subjectmatter of<lb/> | ||
controversy and the separate and independent existence of <del> | controversy and the separate and independent existence of <del>divers <gap/></del> <add>divers</add><lb/> | ||
modifications of <hi rend="underline">form</hi> has been seriously maintained</p> | modifications of <hi rend="underline">form</hi> has been seriously maintained</p> | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
a circle</note> | a circle</note> | ||
<p>Thus Montesquieu, as if ( | <p>Thus Montesquieu, as if (says he) before a circle<lb/> | ||
was in existence <del><gap/></del> its radii were not all of them <del><gap/></del><lb/> | was in existence <del><gap/></del> its radii were not all of them <del><gap/></del><lb/> | ||
equal each to every other.</p> | equal each to every other.</p> | ||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1831 March 10 M
Posology
Introduction
2
Place in the Table
3
or 10
Per some, form
is, in some of its
modifications, a
being as capable
of existence as body is
A notion hitherto prevalent among the cultivators of the
field of posology is — that form, in certain of its modifications,
is a being existing by itself or at least capable of existing just as a body is a being existing
by itself
or 11
Hence, per Euclid
a point is, &c, so
a line is — a surface
is — as well as a
solid is.
On this supposition accordingly is every doctrine contained in
the work stiled the Elements of Geometry the work of Euclid, the
father of the that art and science grounded; for a line is (he says) so and so
a surface is (he says) so and so — [a solid is (he says) so and so]
or 12
Clouded by this
misconception this
part of the field.
By this mode of consideration and discourse, signal has
been the obscurity shed over this whole this part of the metaphorical field: it has been
as it were under in a cloud
or 13
Subjectmatter of
controversy
or 13
Question controverted
has form a separate
existence? yes or no?
Among the So true is this that whether what belongs to
quantity has or has not an existence independent of the
existence of body has among the learned been a subjectmatter of
controversy and the separate and independent existence of divers divers
modifications of form has been seriously maintained
or 14
Per Montesquieu, Yes:
applied to radii of
a circle
Thus Montesquieu, as if (says he) before a circle
was in existence its radii were not all of them
equal each to every other.
Identifier: | JB/135/321/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 135. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1831-03-10 |
or 10 - or 14 |
||
135 |
posology |
||
321 |
posology |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
e3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
street & co 1830 |
||
antonio alcala galiano |
|||
1830 |
|||
46439 |
|||