JB/137/079/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/079/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1819 Dec 6<lb/>
Radicalism not dangerous</head>


<note>Ireland<lb/>
1. Bill &amp;c recapitulated<lb/>
Compared with<lb/>
triannuality, annuality<lb/>
not deemed to<lb/>
important as to preclude<lb/>
acceptance of<lb/>
trinniality if with<lb/>
secrecy, equality<lb/>
and housholdership<lb/>
But in favour of it<lb/>
no reason could be<lb/>
found</note><lb/>


<p>4. As compared with annually <add>triannuality</add> of suffrage <del>I <gap/></del><lb/>
annuality of suffrage did not point itself to me as<lb/>
being of that importance that should prevent me<lb/>
in the supposition of its depending upon myself from<lb/>
<add><del>giving acceptance</del> to it</add> <del>accepting of it</del> surrounding it on condition of obtaining<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> triannuality with secrecy of <add>equality of suffrage</add> suffrage, and<lb/>
housholder suffrage.  But <del>I <gap/> no</del> if asked for<lb/>
a reason I am no more able to give you what appears<lb/>
to me a reason in favour of it in preference to<lb/>
annuality than I am to give what appears to me <lb/>
a reason <gap/> favour of housholder suffrage in preference<lb/>
to virtually universal suffrage.</p>
<note>6<lb/>
Precedents for annuality:<lb/>
1. Landed Common <lb/>
Council and Mayor<lb/>
Elections<lb/>
2. American States<lb/>
22: inconvenience<lb/>
none</note><lb/>
<note>7<lb/>
Two triannuality<lb/>
reasons none but<lb/>
the word moderate</note> <lb/>
<p> <add>On the ground of precedent and experience</add> In favour of annuality I see the <sic>antient</sic> <lb/>
parliamentary practice in this <add>England</add> country the existing<lb/>
practice in the governing body of the Metropolis of<lb/>
the empire and the practice in any one of the<lb/>
22 American United States: in any instance without<lb/>
<sic>alledged</sic> inconvenience in any shape</p>
<p>In support <add>place</add> of it I see nothing but the epithet<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">moderate</hi> which by those who adhere to it<lb/>
insist upon bestowing on it.</p>
<note>8<lb/>
Proposed, as it commonly<lb/>
is, without<lb/>
serving or even equality<lb/>
<add>triannuality instead of <gap/></add> <del>no affect but the</del><lb/>
promises no effect<lb/>
but is more frequent<lb/>
recurrent of a united<lb/>
for seats under<lb/>
an <add>abusive</add> system of representation<lb/>
to which it<lb/>
applies no corruption</note><lb/>
<p><add>And as for any effect produced by</add> When proposed it seems comments to be <lb/>
proposed without the addition of either <add>seeing if to pass</add> virtual universality<lb/>
of suffrage or so usual as practical equally of suffrage.<lb/>
and in these terms I see not any effect good or<lb/>
bad that can be produced by it except by giving additional<lb/>
frequency be a contest of which the <add>evils</add> inconveniences<lb/>
are sensible and undeniable and which ultimately must<lb/>
if a faint chance of ulterior change, produces not any <add>any</add> <note>any <gap/> change<lb/>
in the shape of the representation,<lb/>
having<lb/>
uncorrected and unpalliated<lb/>
all the actions<lb/>
and evils the<lb/>
<gap/> of excluding which presents the only possible use and demand for the reform which it professes to give [</note></p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec 6
Radicalism not dangerous

Ireland
1. Bill &c recapitulated
Compared with
triannuality, annuality
not deemed to
important as to preclude
acceptance of
trinniality if with
secrecy, equality
and housholdership
But in favour of it
no reason could be
found

4. As compared with annually triannuality of suffrage I
annuality of suffrage did not point itself to me as
being of that importance that should prevent me
in the supposition of its depending upon myself from
giving acceptance to it accepting of it surrounding it on condition of obtaining
triannuality with secrecy of equality of suffrage suffrage, and
housholder suffrage. But I no if asked for
a reason I am no more able to give you what appears
to me a reason in favour of it in preference to
annuality than I am to give what appears to me
a reason favour of housholder suffrage in preference
to virtually universal suffrage.

6
Precedents for annuality:
1. Landed Common
Council and Mayor
Elections
2. American States
22: inconvenience
none

7
Two triannuality
reasons none but
the word moderate

On the ground of precedent and experience In favour of annuality I see the antient
parliamentary practice in this England country the existing
practice in the governing body of the Metropolis of
the empire and the practice in any one of the
22 American United States: in any instance without
alledged inconvenience in any shape

In support place of it I see nothing but the epithet
moderate which by those who adhere to it
insist upon bestowing on it.

8
Proposed, as it commonly
is, without
serving or even equality
triannuality instead of no affect but the
promises no effect
but is more frequent
recurrent of a united
for seats under
an abusive system of representation
to which it
applies no corruption

And as for any effect produced by When proposed it seems comments to be
proposed without the addition of either seeing if to pass virtual universality
of suffrage or so usual as practical equally of suffrage.
and in these terms I see not any effect good or
bad that can be produced by it except by giving additional
frequency be a contest of which the evils inconveniences
are sensible and undeniable and which ultimately must
if a faint chance of ulterior change, produces not any any any change
in the shape of the representation,
having
uncorrected and unpalliated
all the actions
and evils the
of excluding which presents the only possible use and demand for the reform which it professes to give [



Identifier: | JB/137/079/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

5-8

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

079

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46796

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in