JB/137/111/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/111/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>1819. Nov.21</p>
<head>1819. Nov. 21<lb/>
<note><gap/> Nature of the case</note><lb/>
IX. Radicalism not</head>


<p><!-- In pencil-->IX. Radicalism not</p>
<note>II. Nature of the case</note>


<head><del>S<gap/> Employ <gap/></del> </head><lb/>
<p><del>S<gap/> Employ this</del></p>
<note>1 &sect;.3.III. Moveables<lb/>
 
<note>1 &sect;. 3. III. Moveables<lb/>
Value must be<lb/>
Value must be<lb/>
<gap/> or of the articles<lb/>
<gap/> or if the articles<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del></note>
<del>are <gap/></del></note>
<p>&sect;.3.III. Partition of moveables impossible.</p>
<p><del><gap/> and <gap/></del><add>To fact us pass an now</add> to property in a moveable shape, <add>Here</add><del><gap/></del><lb/>
if measurement <add>weighing </add> enumeration and valuation be performed at all,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> no time <del><gap/></del><add>would be to</add> to test: for, in a scale <del>varying <gap/> hundred</del> <add><del><gap/>ing <gap/></del></add> of <note><add>[+]</add> the <gap/> the respect<lb/>
of which for <gap/><lb/>
is this <gap/> <gap/> that<lb/>
contribute acting to subsistence<lb/>
and <gap/><lb/>
comparatively the<gap/><lb/>
the use <gap/> to nothing..<lb/>
the article<lb/>
which will <gap/> mount<lb/>
be falling into decay<lb/>
will be utterly distinctive<lb/>
of all value, are these<lb/>
what are necessary to<lb/>
subsistence</note><lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>with hundreds of years  at one end and moments at the other,</add> decay will <del>be</del><add>rise with</add> more or less impudity: and<lb/>
as for reproduction, <add>of</add> <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, it will presently be seen this could be<lb/>
<gap/>.</p>
 
<p>An objective must have at the outset be anticipated,<lb/>
In the case of <hi rend="underline">moveable</hi> articles (it may be said) speak not<lb/>
of distinction <add>of value</add> as the necessary consequence of <hi rend="underline">division</hi> : of the<lb/>
destruction of <add>the</add> <hi rend="superscript">value</hi> as the necessary consequence of the<lb/>
division of the <hi rend="underline">substances</hi>: for by <hi rend="underline">sale</hi> , <add>then as now, </add> that <del>would be</del><lb/>
equalizations would be <add>made easy</add> <del>accomplished</del> which otherwise would<lb/>
be impossible in <add>[+]</add> <del><gap/> sale</del> <hi rend="underline">Sale</hi>, <add>with or without exception in regard to</add> necessaries from<lb/>
hand to mouth would, <add>were by the supposition</add> be altogether at one end. in the<lb/>
first place there would be no money at all <add>for purchase </add> in the next plan,<lb/>
if there were money any where, there would be none that<lb/>
would be spared for the purchase of <add>any of those</add> articles by the possession<lb/>
of any one of which the supposed equality would be destroyed<lb/>
<del><gap/> of <gap/> <gap/></del>ly.  That there would be among the results<lb/>
<gap/> already have been anticipated.  But <del><gap/></del><add>a</add> proof <add>more</add> in detail<lb/>
will be seen presently.</p>


<p>&sect;. 3. III. Partition of moveables impossible.</p>


<p>1819. Nov.21</p>
<p><del><gap/> and <gap/></del><add><gap/> we pass on now</add> to property in a moveable shape. <add>Here</add> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<note><gap/> Nature of the case</note><lb/>
if measurement <add>weighing</add> enumeration and valuation be performed at all,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> no time <del><gap/></del> <add>would be to</add> to test: for, on a scale <del>varying from hundreds</del> <add><del>varying <gap/></del></add> of<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>with hundreds of years  at one end and moments at the other,</add> decay will <del>be</del><add>rise with</add> more or less rapidity: and<lb/>
as for reproduction, <add>of</add> <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, it will presently be seen this could be<lb/>
none.</p>


<p><!-- In pencil-->IX. Radicalism not</p>
<note><add>[+]</add> the articles in respect<lb/>
 
<head><del>S<gap/>  Employ <gap/></del> </head><lb/>
<note>1 &sect;.3.III. Moveables<lb/>
Value must be<lb/>
<gap/> or of the articles<lb/>
<del><gap/> <gap/></del></note>
<p>&sect;.3.III. Partition of moveables impossible.</p>
<p><del><gap/> and <gap/></del><add>To fact us pass an now</add> to property in a moveable shape, <add>Here</add><del><gap/></del><lb/>
if measurement <add>weighing </add> enumeration and valuation be performed at all,<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> no time <del><gap/></del><add>would be to</add> to test: for, in a scale <del>varying <gap/> hundred</del> <add><del><gap/>ing <gap/></del></add> of <note><add>[+]</add> the <gap/> the respect<lb/>
of which for <gap/><lb/>
of which for <gap/><lb/>
is this <gap/> <gap/> that<lb/>
is this <gap/> <gap/> that<lb/>
contribute acting to subsistence<lb/>
contribute nothing to subsistence<lb/>
and <gap/><lb/>
and of which<lb/>
comparatively the<gap/><lb/>
comparatively the use,<lb/>
the use <gap/> to nothing..<lb/>
the use <gap/> to nothing,<lb/>
the article<lb/>
the article<lb/>
which will <gap/> mount<lb/>
which will <gap/> mount<lb/>
be falling into decay<lb/>
be falling into decay<lb/>
will be utterly distinctive<lb/>
will be utterly destructive<lb/>
of all value, are these<lb/>
of all value, are those<lb/>
what are necessary to<lb/>
which are necessary to<lb/>
subsistence</note><lb/>
subsistence</note>
<del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>with hundreds of years  at one end and moments at the other,</add> decay will <del>be</del><add>rise with</add> more or less impudity: and<lb/>
as for reproduction, <add>of</add> <hi rend="underline">that</hi>, it will presently be seen this could be<lb/>
<gap/>.</p>


<p>An objective must have at the outset be anticipated,<lb/>
<p>An objection must here at the outset be anticipated.<lb/>
In the case of <hi rend="underline">moveable</hi> articles (it may be said) speak not<lb/>
In the case of <hi rend="underline">moveable</hi> articles (it may be said) speak not<lb/>
of distinction <add>of value</add> as the necessary consequence of <hi rend="underline">division</hi> : of the<lb/>
of distinction <add>of value</add> as the necessary consequence of <hi rend="underline">division</hi>: of the<lb/>
destruction of <add>the</add> <hi rend="superscript">value</hi> as the necessary consequence of the<lb/>
destruction of <add>the</add> <hi rend="underline">value</hi> as the necessary consequence of the<lb/>
division of the <hi rend="underline">substances</hi>: for by <hi rend="underline">sale</hi> , <add>then as now, </add> that <del>would be</del><lb/>
division of the <hi rend="underline">substance</hi>: for by <hi rend="underline">sale</hi>, <add>then as now, </add> that <del>would be</del><lb/>
equalizations would be <add>made easy</add> <del>accomplished</del> which otherwise would<lb/>
equalizations would be <add>made easy</add> <del>accomplished</del> which otherwise would<lb/>
be impossible in <add>[+]</add> <del><gap/> sale</del> <hi rend="underline">Sale</hi>, <add>with or without exception in regard to</add> necessaries from<lb/>
be impossible in <add>[+]</add> <del><gap/> sale</del> <hi rend="underline">Sale</hi>, <add>with or without exception in regard to</add> necessaries from<lb/>
hand to mouth would, <add>were by the supposition</add> be altogether at one end. in the<lb/>
hand to mouth would, <add>were by the supposition</add> be altogether at one end, in the<lb/>
first place there would be no money at all <add>for purchase </add> in the next plan,<lb/>
first place there would be no money at all <add>for purchase's</add> in the next plan, <note><add>[=]</add> Such is the resource<lb/>
presented. But alas!<lb/>
how <sic>compleatly</sic> vain!</note><lb/>
if there were money any where, there would be none that<lb/>
if there were money any where, there would be none that<lb/>
would be spared for the purchase of <add>any of those</add> articles by the possession<lb/>
would be spared for the purchase of <add>any of those</add> articles by the possession<lb/>
of any one of which the supposed equality would be destroyed<lb/>
of any one of which the supposed equality would be destroyed.<lb/>
<del><gap/> of <gap/> <gap/></del>ly.  That there would be among the results<lb/>
<del><gap/> of <gap/> <gap/></del>ly.  That there would be among the results<lb/>
<gap/> already have been anticipated. But <del><gap/></del><add>a</add> proof <add>more</add> in detail<lb/>
many already have been anticipated. But <del><gap/></del><add>a</add> proof <add>more</add> in detail<lb/>
will be seen presently.</p>
will be seen presently.</p>


<note><!-- Pencil note -->with a quickness<lb/>
proportional to the<lb/>
promptitude of<lb/>
decay where <gap/><lb/>
for preservation were<lb/>
wanting would<lb/>
value perish: the<lb/>
soonest, all except<lb/>
grain: employed<lb/>
for subsistence.</note>
<note><!-- Pencil note -->25<lb/>
Objection. By <hi rend="underline">sale</hi>,<lb/>
destructive by division<lb/>
would be prevented<lb/>
Answer.<lb/>
1. No money to buy<lb/>
with<lb/>
2. By purchase, the<lb/>
equality would be<lb/>
destroyed<lb/>
So further on</note>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:36, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819. Nov. 21
IX. Radicalism not

II. Nature of the case

S Employ this

1 §. 3. III. Moveables
Value must be
or if the articles
are

§. 3. III. Partition of moveables impossible.

and we pass on now to property in a moveable shape. Here
if measurement weighing enumeration and valuation be performed at all,
no time would be to to test: for, on a scale varying from hundreds varying of
with hundreds of years at one end and moments at the other, decay will berise with more or less rapidity: and
as for reproduction, of that, it will presently be seen this could be
none.

[+] the articles in respect
of which for
is this that
contribute nothing to subsistence
and of which
comparatively the use,
the use to nothing,
the article
which will mount
be falling into decay
will be utterly destructive
of all value, are those
which are necessary to
subsistence

An objection must here at the outset be anticipated.
In the case of moveable articles (it may be said) speak not
of distinction of value as the necessary consequence of division: of the
destruction of the value as the necessary consequence of the
division of the substance: for by sale, then as now, that would be
equalizations would be made easy accomplished which otherwise would
be impossible in [+] sale Sale, with or without exception in regard to necessaries from
hand to mouth would, were by the supposition be altogether at one end, in the
first place there would be no money at all for purchase's in the next plan, [=] Such is the resource
presented. But alas!
how compleatly vain!

if there were money any where, there would be none that
would be spared for the purchase of any of those articles by the possession
of any one of which the supposed equality would be destroyed.
of ly. That there would be among the results
many already have been anticipated. But a proof more in detail
will be seen presently.

with a quickness
proportional to the
promptitude of
decay where
for preservation were
wanting would
value perish: the
soonest, all except
grain: employed
for subsistence.

25
Objection. By sale,
destructive by division
would be prevented
Answer.
1. No money to buy
with
2. By purchase, the
equality would be
destroyed
So further on



Identifier: | JB/137/111/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-11-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

[[marginal_summary_numbering::[unnumbered], 25]]

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

111

Info in main headings field

radicalism not

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

john dickinson & c<…> 1813

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

a. levy

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1813

Notes public

ID Number

46828

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in