JB/141/139/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/141/139/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p><note>Collective punish<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/>
 
New <gap/> <!-- note in pencil --></note> as the pattern and ground work of a great plan<lb/>
 
of constitutional improvement.* It distributes <add>disseminates</add> &amp;<lb/>
throws into more hands the <add>great</add> privilege of election,<lb/>
the <del>gre</del> only branch of power which a great<add>any large</add><lb/>
body <add>bodies among</add> of the people can <del>possess</del><add>find it</add> for their advantage.<lb/>
to possess.</p>


<head>Note</head><lb/>
<p>* One thing let me be permitted to mention which I<lb/>
think would have been an improvement. and would<lb/>
have done all that could be wanting to reconcile the<lb/>
measure to the strict pinciples of ordinary justice.<lb/>
A part of the electors stood in a meritorious light. They<lb/>
had either the merit to withstand, or the good fortune to<lb/>
escape, the temptation <del>under</del> <add><del>to</del> to</add> which their co-electors yielded.<lb/>
Yet by the Statute in question the condition of this<lb/>
meritorious part so far from being better'd was rendered<lb/>
worse than it was before. <del><del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/> presented</del><add>There was a method  by which </add><lb/>
this <del><gap/></del> might<add>I think</add> have been prevented without<lb/>
the least prejudice to the reforming part of the measure.<lb/>
and at the same time a <del>short</del> signal encouragement<lb/>
held out to conscientious Electors: and this without<lb/>
any prejudice to the reforming part of the measure.<lb/>
The expedient was a simple one. It was but the<lb/>
adding to the number of votes which each of the<lb/>
sound voters should have under the new constitution<lb/>
in such manner that the weight of each man's<lb/>
suffrage should bear the same proportion to<lb/>
that of the rest under the new <del>constitution</del> <add>constitution</add> as<lb/>
it <del>did</del> <add>had done</add> under the old one. The benefits <add>thus</add> reserved<lb/>
would in such case have told for more than it<lb/>
was in reality. The men by being only not punished</p><pb/>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:39, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Collective punisht
New
as the pattern and ground work of a great plan
of constitutional improvement.* It distributes disseminates &
throws into more hands the great privilege of election,
the gre only branch of power which a greatany large
body bodies among of the people can possessfind it for their advantage.
to possess.

Note

* One thing let me be permitted to mention which I
think would have been an improvement. and would
have done all that could be wanting to reconcile the
measure to the strict pinciples of ordinary justice.
A part of the electors stood in a meritorious light. They
had either the merit to withstand, or the good fortune to
escape, the temptation under to to which their co-electors yielded.
Yet by the Statute in question the condition of this
meritorious part so far from being better'd was rendered
worse than it was before. presentedThere was a method by which
this mightI think have been prevented without
the least prejudice to the reforming part of the measure.
and at the same time a short signal encouragement
held out to conscientious Electors: and this without
any prejudice to the reforming part of the measure.
The expedient was a simple one. It was but the
adding to the number of votes which each of the
sound voters should have under the new constitution
in such manner that the weight of each man's
suffrage should bear the same proportion to
that of the rest under the new constitution constitution as
it did had done under the old one. The benefits thus reserved
would in such case have told for more than it
was in reality. The men by being only not punished


---page break---


Identifier: | JB/141/139/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

141

Main Headings

rationale of punishment

Folio number

139

Info in main headings field

punishment in alienam personam

Image

002

Titles

note / deodands / bail

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f39 / f40 / f41 / f42

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48356

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in