★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Note continued</head> | <head>Note continued</head> | ||
<p>-ished, would have seemed to be rewarded. They certainly <lb/> | <p>-ished, would have seemed to be rewarded. They certainly <note>Collective punishm<hi rend="superscript">t</hi><lb/> | ||
New Shoreham <!-- Pencil marginal note --></note><lb/> | |||
would have been rewarded <add>in point of</add><del>by the</del> honour.<lb/> | would have been rewarded <add>in point of</add><del>by the</del> honour.<lb/> | ||
If a religious attention were <add>constantly to be</add> paid private subsisting<lb/> | If a religious attention were <add>constantly to be</add> paid private subsisting<lb/> | ||
Line 10: | Line 11: | ||
be neglected without<lb/> | be neglected without<lb/> | ||
injustice,</del></note><lb/> | injustice,</del></note><lb/> | ||
would be | would be deliver'd from <add>much of</add> that opposition <lb/> | ||
which it is <del><gap/></del><add>at present</add> apt to meet with. One may<lb/> | which it is <del><gap/></del><add>at present</add> apt to meet with. One may<lb/> | ||
say to Reformers, <hi rend="underline">Serve the whole, but forget not</hi><lb/> | say to Reformers, <hi rend="underline">Serve the whole, but forget not</hi><lb/> | ||
<hi rend="underline">that each member is a part of it.</hi></p> | <hi rend="underline">that each member is a part of it.</hi></p> | ||
< | <note><hi rend="underline">Note continued</hi><lb/> | ||
Strictly speaking, it is<lb/> | Strictly speaking, it is<lb/> | ||
true, that the Electors<lb/> | true, that the Electors<lb/> | ||
Line 28: | Line 29: | ||
you ought not to be<lb/> | you ought not to be<lb/> | ||
trusted with it. If you<lb/> | trusted with it. If you<lb/> | ||
do it is no benefit<lb/> | do it is of no benefit<lb/> | ||
to you, and you can<lb/> | to you, and you can<lb/> | ||
<!-- continues below another marginal note --><lb/> | <!-- continues below another marginal note --><lb/> | ||
Line 35: | Line 36: | ||
taken from you for<lb/> | taken from you for<lb/> | ||
the benefit of the State.</note> | the benefit of the State.</note> | ||
<head>NOTE</head> | |||
<p>The incapacitated Electors were about sixty: suppose<lb/> | <p>The incapacitated Electors were about sixty: suppose<lb/> | ||
those not incapacitated to have been 20 : The suffrages<lb/> | those not incapacitated to have been 20 : The suffrages<lb/> | ||
of the untainted part were on this supposition of 1/3<lb/> | of the untainted part were on this supposition of 1/3<lb/> | ||
part of the whole. Suppose the new | part of the whole. Suppose the new-admitted voters<lb/> | ||
to <del>be <gap/></del><add>have been</add> such a number, viz: 580 when added<lb/> | to <del>be <gap/></del><add>have been</add> such a number, viz: 580 when added<lb/> | ||
to the twenty left would make up the whole number<lb/> | to the twenty left would make up the whole number<lb/> | ||
600. I would have had <del> | 600. I would have had <del>given</del> ten votes given to each <note>Instead of that<lb/> | ||
they are <gap/> to<lb/> | they are <gap/> to<lb/> | ||
a | a tenth part of<lb/> | ||
their former influence<lb/> | their former influence<lb/> | ||
[value]</note><lb/> | |||
of the old electors; their suffrages taken together would<lb/> | of the old electors; their suffrages taken together would<lb/> | ||
then have | then have & born the same proportion to those of the<lb/> | ||
rest under the new constitution as under the old one:<lb/> | rest under the new constitution as under the old one:<lb/> | ||
as for 20 is to 60, so is 200 to 600. As those old<lb/> | for as for 20 is to 60, so is 200 to 600. As those old<lb/> | ||
ones came to die off, the<add>standing</add> improvement would have<lb/> | ones came to die off, the<add>standing</add> improvement would have<lb/> | ||
taken place.</p> | taken place.</p> | ||
<p>...This was the man to have | <p>...This was the man to have rewarded with a<lb/> | ||
statue in the [Palladium] of the Metropolis. <add>This</add> rather<lb/> | statue in the [Palladium] of the Metropolis. <add>This</add> rather<lb/> | ||
than he whose merit consisted in the offering to<lb/> | than he whose merit consisted in the offering to<lb/> | ||
<del> | <del>personal affron</del> the <del><gap/></del> First Magistrate of the<lb/> | ||
state a personal affront <add>bravado</add>, which <del>was</del> exemplified<lb/> | state a personal affront <add>bravado</add>, which <del>was</del> exemplified<lb/> | ||
no self-denial | no self-denial, was attended with no danger,<lb/> | ||
& promised no success.</p><pb/> | & promised no success.</p><pb/> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
Click Here To Edit Note continued
-ished, would have seemed to be rewarded. They certainly Collective punishmt
New Shoreham
would have been rewarded in point ofby the honour.
If a religious attention were constantly to be paid private subsisting
interests which being temporary may always
be provided for at a small expence, reformation and which cannot
be neglected without
injustice,
would be deliver'd from much of that opposition
which it is at present apt to meet with. One may
say to Reformers, Serve the whole, but forget not
that each member is a part of it.
Note continued
Strictly speaking, it is
true, that the Electors
have no reason to complain,
except as above,
upon the occasion of an
extension of the Elective
franchise. The dilemma
is clear: if you
do not mean to discharge
it conscientiously
you ought not to be
trusted with it. If you
do it is of no benefit
to you, and you can
have no ground to
complain of its being
taken from you for
the benefit of the State.
NOTE
The incapacitated Electors were about sixty: suppose
those not incapacitated to have been 20 : The suffrages
of the untainted part were on this supposition of 1/3
part of the whole. Suppose the new-admitted voters
to be have been such a number, viz: 580 when added
to the twenty left would make up the whole number
600. I would have had given ten votes given to each Instead of that
they are to
a tenth part of
their former influence
[value]
of the old electors; their suffrages taken together would
then have & born the same proportion to those of the
rest under the new constitution as under the old one:
for as for 20 is to 60, so is 200 to 600. As those old
ones came to die off, thestanding improvement would have
taken place.
...This was the man to have rewarded with a
statue in the [Palladium] of the Metropolis. This rather
than he whose merit consisted in the offering to
personal affron the First Magistrate of the
state a personal affront bravado, which was exemplified
no self-denial, was attended with no danger,
& promised no success.
---page break---
Identifier: | JB/141/139/003"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 141. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
not numbered |
|||
141 |
rationale of punishment |
||
139 |
punishment in alienam personam |
||
003 |
note / deodands / bail |
||
text sheet |
4 |
||
recto |
f39 / f40 / f41 / f42 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]] |
||
caroline vernon |
|||
48356 |
|||