JB/149/346/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/149/346/001: Difference between revisions

WilsonC (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
to these, it is manifest, can make no <add>a</add>dvance: it must<lb/>
to these, it is manifest, can make no <add>a</add>dvance: it must<lb/>
either stop short, or turn-back, as it were, upon itself, in a<lb/>
either stop short, or turn-back, as it were, upon itself, in a<lb/>
circulate or a <unclear>repetend</unclear>.</p>
circulate or a repetend.</p>
 
<p>"Fortitude is a virtue:" &#x2014; Very well: &#x2014; but what is a<lb/>
<p>"Fortitude is a virtue:" &#x2014; Very well: &#x2014; but what is a<lb/>
<unclear>&sect;.</unclear> virtue? "Virtue is a disposition:" &#x2014; Good again: &#x2014; but what<lb/>
virtue? "Virtue is a disposition:" &#x2014; Good again: &#x2014; but what<lb/>
is a disposition? "A disposition is a ---;" and there we stop. The<lb/>
is a disposition? "A disposition is a ---;" and there we stop. The<lb/>
fact is, a <hi rend="underline">disposition</hi> has no <hi rend="underline">superior genus</hi>: <hi rend="underline">a disposition</hi> is not a<lb/>
fact is, a <hi rend="underline">disposition</hi> has no <hi rend="underline">superior genus</hi>: <hi rend="underline">a disposition</hi> is not a<lb/>
---, any thing: &#x2014; this is not the way to give us any notion<lb/>
---, any thing: &#x2014; this is not the way to give us any notion<lb/>
of what is meant by it. " A <hi rend="underline">power</hi>," again, "is a right:" and<lb/>
of what is meant by it." A <hi rend="underline">power</hi>," again, "is a right:" and<lb/>
what is a <hi rend="underline">right</hi>? It is a <hi rend="underline">power</hi>. &#x2014; An <hi rend="underline">estate</hi> is an <hi rend="underline">interest</hi>,<lb/>
what is a <hi rend="underline">right</hi>? It is a <hi rend="underline">power</hi>. &#x2014; An <hi rend="underline">estate</hi> is an <hi rend="underline">interest</hi>,<lb/>
says our Author somewhere; where he begins defining an estate<lb/>
says our Author somewhere; where he begins defining an estate<lb/>
&#x2014; as well might he <add>have</add> said an <hi rend="underline">interest</hi> was an <hi rend="underline">estate</hi>. As well,<lb/>
&#x2014; as well might he <add>have</add> said an <hi rend="underline">interest</hi> was an <hi rend="underline">estate</hi>. As well,<lb/>
in short, were it to define in this manner, a <add>con</add>junction or a<lb/>
in short, were it to define in this manner, a <add>con</add>junction or a<lb/>
preposition. As well were <add>it</add> to say of the preposition <hi rend="underline">through</hi> or<lb/>
preposition. As well were it <add>to</add> say of the preposition <hi rend="underline">through</hi> or<lb/>
of the conjunction <hi rend="underline">because</hi>; a <hi rend="underline">through</hi> is a ---, or a <hi rend="underline">because</hi> is<lb/>
of the conjunction <hi rend="underline">because</hi>; a <hi rend="underline">through</hi> is a ---, or a <hi rend="underline">because</hi> is<lb/>
a ---, and so go on defining them.</p>
a ---, and so go on defining them.</p>
<p>Of this stamp, by the bye, are some of his most fundamental<lb/>
<p>Of this stamp, by the bye, are some of his most fundamental<lb/>
definitions: of consequence they must leave the<lb/>
definitions: of consequence they must leave the<lb/>
Line 29: Line 31:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:42, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

The common method of defining — the method per genus & differentiam,
as logicians call it, will, in many cases, not at all answer the
purpose. Among abstract terms we soon come to such as have
no superior genus. A definition, per genus & differentium, when applied
to these, it is manifest, can make no advance: it must
either stop short, or turn-back, as it were, upon itself, in a
circulate or a repetend.

"Fortitude is a virtue:" — Very well: — but what is a
virtue? "Virtue is a disposition:" — Good again: — but what
is a disposition? "A disposition is a ---;" and there we stop. The
fact is, a disposition has no superior genus: a disposition is not a
---, any thing: — this is not the way to give us any notion
of what is meant by it." A power," again, "is a right:" and
what is a right? It is a power. — An estate is an interest,
says our Author somewhere; where he begins defining an estate
— as well might he have said an interest was an estate. As well,
in short, were it to define in this manner, a conjunction or a
preposition. As well were it to say of the preposition through or
of the conjunction because; a through is a ---, or a because is
a ---, and so go on defining them.

Of this stamp, by the bye, are some of his most fundamental
definitions: of consequence they must leave the
reader where they found him.



Identifier: | JB/149/346/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

149

Main Headings

Folio number

346

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50200

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in