JB/150/357/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/357/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 22: Line 22:
there still remains a deficiency, and no<lb/>
there still remains a deficiency, and no<lb/>
determinate period hold out view by the<lb/>
determinate period hold out view by the<lb/>
the end of which that deficiency <del>was</del> is expected<lb/>
end of which that deficiency <del>was</del> is expected<lb/>
to be supplied<add>filled up</add>, all <del><gap/></del> calculations grounded<lb/>
to be supplied<add>filled up</add>, all <del><gap/></del> calculations grounded<lb/>
in the prospect of a surplus must  evidently<lb/>
in the prospect of a surplus must  evidently<lb/>
Line 28: Line 28:
<p>But here a fallacy will require to be guarded against.<lb/>
<p>But here a fallacy will require to be guarded against.<lb/>
The <add>actual</add> expence of the Colony has been estimated<lb/>
The <add>actual</add> expence of the Colony has been estimated<lb/>
at £137,000 a year, <add>issued in the Country. </add> But it is not the Colony's furnishing <lb/>
at £137,000 a year, <add>issued in this Country. </add> But it is not the Colony's furnishing <lb/>
a surplus produce to the amount of £137,000<lb/>
a surplus produce to the amount of £137,000<lb/>
that will be an equivalent for that expence: the<lb/>
that will be an equivalent for that expence: the<lb/>
surplus, to an equivalent must be the property <del>of</del><lb/>
surplus, to be an equivalent must be the property <del>of</del><lb/>
not of individualss: but of government. It must be<lb/>
not of individualss: but of government. It must be<lb/>
composed either of the  real <add>annual</add> produce of lands and <unclear>tenaments</unclear><lb/>
composed either of the  real <add>annual</add> produce of lands and <unclear>tenaments</unclear><lb/>
in the hands of government, all expences paid,<lb/>
in the hands of government, all expences paid,<lb/>
or of taxes based upon an adequate mass of the <del>pro</del> colonial<lb/>
or of taxes based upon an adequate mass of the <del>pro</del> colonial<lb/>
produced the property of individual.  If levied<lb/>
produce the property of individuals.  If levied<lb/>
by a tax similar to the Colonial taxes on Sugar, say<lb/>
by a tax similar to the Colonial taxes on Sugar, say<lb/>
9 in round numbers, by a 5 per Cent tax, the quantity<lb/>
9 in round numbers, by a 5 per Cent tax, the quantity<lb/>
Line 43: Line 43:


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit Police Report 7
Expence of punishment N.S.Wales

which would have received an increase, and
that an increase proportioned to the numbers,population
so transported. If by any surplus of such
articles as it is capable of producing it were
capable of being made to provide payment for
such articles as it is not capable of producing
it could come to the same thing as if it produced
the whole: But instead of any such
surplus though even then it would be requisite
that the value of such surplus articles
should be considerable enough in proportion
to its bulk to pay for the freight on of a voyage
of little if at all less length than double that of
an East India Voyage. But where after a
course of experiment carried on for twelve years
there still remains a deficiency, and no
determinate period hold out view by the
end of which that deficiency was is expected
to be suppliedfilled up, all calculations grounded
in the prospect of a surplus must evidently
be premature

But here a fallacy will require to be guarded against.
The actual expence of the Colony has been estimated
at £137,000 a year, issued in this Country. But it is not the Colony's furnishing
a surplus produce to the amount of £137,000
that will be an equivalent for that expence: the
surplus, to be an equivalent must be the property of
not of individualss: but of government. It must be
composed either of the real annual produce of lands and tenaments
in the hands of government, all expences paid,
or of taxes based upon an adequate mass of the pro colonial
produce the property of individuals. If levied
by a tax similar to the Colonial taxes on Sugar, say
9 in round numbers, by a 5 per Cent tax, the quantity
of surplus produce that must have been brought into <add>[+]</add> into existence for this purpose must have been -not £137,000 a year, but £2,740,000: and then would come the question how much more per cent capital employ'd in giving birth to this £2,740,000 a year in this distant colony has produced when being so employ'd. than it would have been produced had it been employ'd in Britain.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/150/357/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales; police bill

Folio number

357

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

50578

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in