JB/150/455/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2020

+ Inserenda 27
Police Bill Observations
1 Lincendiae
§1 continued
15
Dock Yards
London Duties
why extended to
them

p.§.1 [15] [Dockyards] In the Royal neigbourhood of the Royal
Dock Yard, the demand for the sort of controul
which it is the object of the Bill to establish is
at least as considerable as in any part of the
London District. Whether the honest branch of
this sort of traffick is or is not be as considerable
in proportion to the numbers engaged in it, the
dishonest is oppos thought to be still more considerable: and if the
effect of the augmentation double or London duty
were to drive out of this branch of traffic as few of the existing honest dealers out of
that Stock of Dealers (supposing the existence of
any such persons, which however may appear rather as any questionable)
the effect would be rather beneficial than
otherwise upon the whole, since by diminishing
the competition it would make it the easier for
those that remained in the trade to gain a
livelyhood without engaging in confederacies with
thieves.

It may have , that Though the London
Duties are thus proposed to be extended to these
Districts, this will not make any change with in
regard to the jurisdiction for the granting of the licences
and taking cognizance of offense the behaviour
of licensed persons as well as of the offense of dealing
without license - Though the district Dock Yard.
with their respective neighbourhoods pay the London
Duty, this will not give the authority of granting
licences in these districts, either to the Board, or
to any set of persons other than those, by whom the
authority would have here to be exercised, if care
the Country Duty rate had been the rate payable in
these as in other places.

As to the two House Dock Yards viz: Deptford &
Woolwich, they no special mention of them is necessary on
this [+]

[+]this occasion, in as much as they are already included situated within the true London limit of the proposed London District.

Identifier: \| JB/150/455/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	15
Box	150	Main Headings	police bill
Folio number	455	Info in main headings field	police bill
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f27
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	50676
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 '''[{{fullurl:JB/150/455/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
+<!-- pencil annotations --> <p> + Inserenda <note>27</note><lb/> Police Bill <note> Observations</note> <lb/> <note> 1 Lincendiae<lb/> §1 continued<lb/> 15<lb/> Dock Yards<lb/> London Duties<lb/> why extended to <lb/> them</note></p>
-<head>Police Bill</head><lb/>
 <p>p.§.1 [15] <add>[Dockyards]</add> In the <del>Royal</del> neigbourhood of the Royal<lb/>
 Dock Yard, the demand for the sort of <sic>controul</sic><lb/>
 which it is the object of the Bill to establish is<lb/>
 at least as considerable as in any part of the <lb/>
-London District.  Whither the honest branch of<lb/>
+London District.  Whether the honest branch of<lb/>
 this sort of <sic>traffick</sic> <add>is or is not</add> <del>be</del> as considerable <del><gap/></del><lb/>
 in proportion to the numbers engaged in it, the<lb/>
@@ Line 20: / Line 19: @@
 the competition it would make it the easier for<lb/>
 those that remained in the trade to gain a <lb/>
-livelyhood without engaging in confederacies with<lb/>
+<sic>livelyhood</sic> without engaging in confederacies with<lb/>
 thieves.</p>
 <p><del>It may have <gap/>, that</del> Though the London<lb/>
@@ Line 27: / Line 26: @@
 regard to the jurisdiction for the granting of the licences<lb/>
 and taking cognizance of <del>offense</del> the behaviour <lb/>
-of <unclear>Wound</unclear> persons as well as <add>of </add> the <sic>offense</sic> of dealing<lb/>
+of licensed persons as well as <add>of </add> the <sic>offense</sic> of dealing<lb/>
 without <sic>license</sic> - Though the district Dock Yard.<lb/>
 with their respective neighbourhoods pay the London<lb/>
-Duty, this will not give the authority of granting <note><add>[+]</add>this occasion, inasmuch as they are <del>already <gap/>ded <gap/></del><add><gap/>ated wither</add> the <add><del>true</del></add> <del>London</del> limit of the <add>proposed</add> London District.</note><lb/>
+Duty, this will not give the authority of granting <lb/>licences in these districts, either to the Board, or<lb/>
-licences in these districts, either to the Board, or<lb/>
 to any set of persons other than those, by whom the<lb/>
 authority would have here to be exercised, if <del>care</del><lb/>
-the Country <del>Duty</del> rate had been the rate payable in<lb/>
+the Country <del>Duty</del> rate had been the rate payable in<lb/>these as in other places.</p>
-these as in other places.</p>
 <p>As to the two <hi rend="underline">House</hi> Dock Yards viz: <hi rend="underline">Deptford</hi> &amp;<lb/>
-<hi rend="underline">Woolwich</hi>, <del>they</del> no special mention of them is necessary on<add>this <del><gap/></del></add></p><pb/>
+<hi rend="underline">Woolwich</hi>, <del>they</del> no special mention of them is necessary on<lb/><add>this </add> <del>[+]</del> </p> <p><note><add>[+]</add>this occasion, in as much as they are <del>already included <gap/></del><add>situated within</add> the <add><del>true</del></add> <del>London</del> limit of the <add>proposed</add> London District.</note></p>
@@ Line 44: / Line 42: @@
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Views

JB/150/455/001: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 10:43, 4 February 2020

Navigation

Search