★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<!-- this page has been crossed out --> | <!-- this page has been crossed out --> | ||
It seems however under a confused notion<lb/>of hardship (I say <hi rend="underline">it seems</hi> for where no reason<lb/>is <del>given</del> <add>assigned</add> conjecture is the only recourse) it<lb/>seems then to be have been under a confused notion of<lb/>hardship that a practice has arisen of <del>framing</del> <add> | It seems however under a confused notion<lb/>of hardship (I say <hi rend="underline">it seems</hi> for where no reason<lb/>is <del>given</del> <add>assigned</add> conjecture is the only recourse) it<lb/>seems then to be <add>have been</add> under a confused notion of<lb/>hardship that a practice has arisen of <del>framing</del> <add>marking out</add><lb/><del>marking up a <unclear>lot</unclear> of procedure</del> <add>the course of procedure</add> in such<lb/><del>manner</del> a way that impunity is the frequent<lb/>and in many circumstances the inevitable<lb/>result of it. <del>Distress is</del> A <del>forfeiture</del> <add>pecuniary penalty</add> is<lb/>provided: a forfeiture <add>alone</add> without imprisonment:<lb/>and for the levying of that <del>forf</del> penalty, Distress<lb/>and Distress alone is appointed in the first<lb/>instances: in failure of sufficient Distress, or<lb/>in failure of all Distress then and then only<lb/>imprisonment is appointed to be employd. But<lb/>before imprisonment can be inflicted <add>applied</add> this<lb/>failure of distrainable property must previously<lb/>have been <add>legally</add> ascertained: and to ascertain it in<lb/>this manner there is but one way, which is<lb/>to issue a warrant for the <del>levy</del> making of such<lb/>Distress. <del>All</del> This <note> contrivance for <lb/>supporting<lb/>combination of <lb/>pecuniary <add>penalties</add> with <lb/>eventual imprisonment</note> <lb/><add><del>combination of pecuniary and corporal penalties</del></add> is perfectly legal and regular.<lb/>The only objection to it is that <add><del>in general</del></add> <note>in the most <lb/>common case that <lb/>can happen</note><lb/> it is <add>not</add> <del>in</del>capable<lb/>of answering either purpose. Not that of levying<lb/>the penalty, because the man has no property <add>nothing</add> <lb/><add>distrainable</add> that can be distrained: which is the case<lb/>of all that are not Housekeepers, as also of all<lb/>that are, where the amount of the forfeiture is<lb/>greater than the inconvenience of removing. Not<lb/>that of imprisonment: for before the Warrant of<lb/>Distress can be returned, the Bird is flown. <del>In</del><lb/> <note><del>all</del></note><lb/> <note>Multiplying</note><lb/><pb/> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
It seems however under a confused notion
of hardship (I say it seems for where no reason
is given assigned conjecture is the only recourse) it
seems then to be have been under a confused notion of
hardship that a practice has arisen of framing marking out
marking up a lot of procedure the course of procedure in such
manner a way that impunity is the frequent
and in many circumstances the inevitable
result of it. Distress is A forfeiture pecuniary penalty is
provided: a forfeiture alone without imprisonment:
and for the levying of that forf penalty, Distress
and Distress alone is appointed in the first
instances: in failure of sufficient Distress, or
in failure of all Distress then and then only
imprisonment is appointed to be employd. But
before imprisonment can be inflicted applied this
failure of distrainable property must previously
have been legally ascertained: and to ascertain it in
this manner there is but one way, which is
to issue a warrant for the levy making of such
Distress. All This contrivance for
supporting
combination of
pecuniary penalties with
eventual imprisonment
combination of pecuniary and corporal penalties is perfectly legal and regular.
The only objection to it is that in general in the most
common case that
can happen
it is not incapable
of answering either purpose. Not that of levying
the penalty, because the man has no property nothing
distrainable that can be distrained: which is the case
of all that are not Housekeepers, as also of all
that are, where the amount of the forfeiture is
greater than the inconvenience of removing. Not
that of imprisonment: for before the Warrant of
Distress can be returned, the Bird is flown. In
all
Multiplying
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/625/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
not numbered |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
625 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
b4 / f196 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
|
fr3 |
|||
|
1794 |
|||
|
50846 |
|||
