★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
bear to be represented: the money disbursed being<lb/><del>a prompt and expeditious measure would</del> <add>the most expeditious and least troublesome standard would therefore</add> probably<lb/>be the <del>measure</del> <add>standard</add> chosen for calculating the number<lb/>of the letters: and if the number, given <del>by actual</del> <add>in his</add><lb/><add>statement as the actual</add><lb/><del>examination had been judging from the disbursement</del><lb/><del>had exceeded the</del> number received and answered<lb/>had been exceeded in any considerable degree by the<lb/>number paid for, <del>the lu</del> there would have been a<lb/>repugnancy in the two accounts, and a misapplication<lb/>of the public money would have been apparent<lb/>upon the fact of them. If then, in an annual<lb/>expenditure to <del>an amount no</del> no greater<lb/>amount than £ 450, in so extensive a department,<lb/><hi rend="underline">abuse</hi> and <hi rend="underline">use</hi> together were both included,<lb/>the abuse <del>alone</del> it is plain, <add>if any</add> could be no great<lb/>object, of itself.<lb/><p>The Excise, it is true, <del>and not the Customs <add>rather than</add></del><lb/>is the department | <note>Inserenda<lb/> | ||
Observations<lb/> | |||
VI. Miscellanea<lb/> | |||
§.52<lb/> | |||
Examples from Passage<lb/> | |||
111</note> | |||
<p>bear to be represented: the money disbursed being<lb/><del>a prompt and expeditious measure would</del> <add>the most expeditious and least troublesome standard would therefore</add> probably<lb/>be the <del>measure</del> <add>standard</add> chosen for calculating the number<lb/>of the letters: and if the number, given <del>by actual</del> <add>in his</add><lb/><add>statement as the actual</add><lb/><del>examination had been judging from the disbursement</del><lb/><del>had exceeded the</del> number received and answered<lb/>had been exceeded in any considerable degree by the<lb/>number paid for, <del>the lu</del> there would have been a<lb/>repugnancy in the two accounts, and a misapplication<lb/>of the public money would have been apparent<lb/>upon the fact of them. If then, in an annual<lb/>expenditure to <del>an amount no</del> no greater<lb/>amount than £ 450, in so extensive a department,<lb/><hi rend="underline">abuse</hi> and <hi rend="underline">use</hi> together were both included,<lb/>the abuse <del>alone</del> it is plain, <add>if any</add> could be no great<lb/>object, of itself.<lb/></p> | |||
<p>The Excise, it is true, <del>and not the Customs <add>rather than</add></del><lb/>is the department | |||
<note>which, if compared <lb/>with the <lb/>Customs, would <lb/>of the two</note><lb/><del>that would</del> afford the fairest<lb/><del>sample</del> | <note>which, if compared <lb/>with the <lb/>Customs, would <lb/>of the two</note><lb/><del>that would</del> afford the fairest<lb/><del>sample</del> | ||
<add> standard for judging</add> of the expenditure that might be expected<lb/>on this score on the part of the Board of Police:<lb/>since <del>the cor</del> in the case of the Excise as in that<lb/>of the <add>proposed</add> Board of Police the correspondence must pervade<lb/>the whole <del>real</del> <add><hi rend="underline">area</hi> of the kingdom,</add> whereas, in the case of the <lb/><del>Customs it is only between the circumference <add>boundary line</add> and<lb/>the central <add>point</add> that the correspondence passes has to pass</del> <lb/>Customs, the only points which the central authority<lb/>has to correspond with, are situated in the<lb/>extreme circumference. But in regard to<lb/>the expenditure of the Excise under this head<lb/>no documents have been been discovered.<lb/></p><pb/> | <add> standard for judging</add> of the expenditure that might be expected<lb/>on this score on the part of the Board of Police:<lb/>since <del>the cor</del> in the case of the Excise as in that<lb/>of the <add>proposed</add> Board of Police the correspondence must pervade<lb/>the whole <del>real</del> <add><hi rend="underline">area</hi> of the kingdom,</add> whereas, in the case of the <lb/><del>Customs it is only between the circumference <add>boundary line</add> and<lb/>the central <add>point</add> that the correspondence passes has to pass</del> <lb/>Customs, the only points which the central authority<lb/>has to correspond with, are situated in the<lb/>extreme circumference. But in regard to<lb/>the expenditure of the Excise under this head<lb/>no documents have been been discovered.<lb/></p><pb/> | ||
| Line 35: | Line 44: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Inserenda
Observations
VI. Miscellanea
§.52
Examples from Passage
111
bear to be represented: the money disbursed being
a prompt and expeditious measure would the most expeditious and least troublesome standard would therefore probably
be the measure standard chosen for calculating the number
of the letters: and if the number, given by actual in his
statement as the actual
examination had been judging from the disbursement
had exceeded the number received and answered
had been exceeded in any considerable degree by the
number paid for, the lu there would have been a
repugnancy in the two accounts, and a misapplication
of the public money would have been apparent
upon the fact of them. If then, in an annual
expenditure to an amount no no greater
amount than £ 450, in so extensive a department,
abuse and use together were both included,
the abuse alone it is plain, if any could be no great
object, of itself.
The Excise, it is true, and not the Customs rather than
is the department
which, if compared
with the
Customs, would
of the two
that would afford the fairest
sample
standard for judging of the expenditure that might be expected
on this score on the part of the Board of Police:
since the cor in the case of the Excise as in that
of the proposed Board of Police the correspondence must pervade
the whole real area of the kingdom, whereas, in the case of the
Customs it is only between the circumference boundary line and
the central point that the correspondence passes has to pass
Customs, the only points which the central authority
has to correspond with, are situated in the
extreme circumference. But in regard to
the expenditure of the Excise under this head
no documents have been been discovered.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/635/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
111 |
|||
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
635 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d6 / f206 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
50856 |
|||
