★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<note>Inserenda<lb/> | |||
Observations<lb/> | |||
VI. Miscellanea<lb/> | |||
§52<lb/> | |||
Exemption from Passage<lb/> | |||
111</note> | |||
<p><del>Judging from this investigation</del></p> | |||
<p>Upon the face of these precedents, the question<lb/>as between franking and payment does not <del>turn<lb/>out to be of t</del> promise to be of that importance<lb/>that was at first expected, because the greatest<lb/>probable amount of the payments likely to be made<lb/>in this score, does not, as far as these precedents<lb/>afford an adequate standard, turn out to<lb/>be so great as was expected. But the truth <del>is,</del> <add>seems to be,</add> <lb/>that no <add>decided</add> inference can <add>well</add> be drawn from the one<lb/>to the other as to this point. In the case of<lb/>the Board of Police no <add>precise</add> limits can be set to the<lb/><add>probable</add> copiousness of the correspondence: this much however<lb/>may be asserted without difficulty, that the<lb/>more copious <del>it proves,</del> the more serviceable, <del>it<lb/><add>untill the serviceableness shall have begun to reduce the</add><lb/>will be, until the time shall have arrived<lb/><add>copiousness.</add><lb/>when the service it has rendered, shall have</del><lb/><add>untill the service done by it shall have begun to</add><lb/><del>operated in diminution of the copiousness of the</del><lb/><add>lessen the demand for it.</add> <lb/><del>demand for it.</del><lb/></p>Under the franking plan, if the <del>above</del> proposed<lb/>restrictions be adopted, all <del>misapplication</del> <add>abuse</add><lb/>of the privilege is manifestly impossible: under the<lb/>postage-payment plan, <add>standing</add> on its present footing, and<lb/><del>unprovided w</del> unguarded by any such restrictions,<lb/><del>abuse</del> <add>abuse</add> <del>misapplication</del> to a certain degree seems<lb/>scarcely to be avoided: and as in the instance of<lb/>the proposed Board, the <add>copiousness <del>copious</del> of the</add> correspondence promises<lb/>to be <del>unparallelled,</del> <add>unexampled,</add> and as the room for such<lb/><del>ap misapplication</del> <add>abuse</add> seems to be in proportion to<lb/>that copiousness, the magnitude of the abuse <del>may <add>might</add></del><lb/>in this instance <del>come</del> <add>under the postage payment plan, <del>even in such</del> might</add><lb/><add><del>come to be</del></add> <del>considerable</del> <note>rise to a <del>considerable</del> <lb/>amount too <lb/>great to be neglected.</note><lb/>the danger <lb/><note>seems</note></p><lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Inserenda
Observations
VI. Miscellanea
§52
Exemption from Passage
111
Judging from this investigation
Upon the face of these precedents, the question
as between franking and payment does not turn
out to be of t promise to be of that importance
that was at first expected, because the greatest
probable amount of the payments likely to be made
in this score, does not, as far as these precedents
afford an adequate standard, turn out to
be so great as was expected. But the truth is, seems to be,
that no decided inference can well be drawn from the one
to the other as to this point. In the case of
the Board of Police no precise limits can be set to the
probable copiousness of the correspondence: this much however
may be asserted without difficulty, that the
more copious it proves, the more serviceable, it
untill the serviceableness shall have begun to reduce the
will be, until the time shall have arrived
copiousness.
when the service it has rendered, shall have
untill the service done by it shall have begun to
operated in diminution of the copiousness of the
lessen the demand for it.
demand for it.
Under the franking plan, if the above proposed
restrictions be adopted, all misapplication abuse
of the privilege is manifestly impossible: under the
postage-payment plan, standing on its present footing, and
unprovided w unguarded by any such restrictions,
abuse abuse misapplication to a certain degree seems
scarcely to be avoided: and as in the instance of
the proposed Board, the copiousness copious of the correspondence promises
to be unparallelled, unexampled, and as the room for such
ap misapplication abuse seems to be in proportion to
that copiousness, the magnitude of the abuse may might
in this instance come under the postage payment plan, even in such might
come to be considerable rise to a considerable
amount too
great to be neglected.
the danger
seems
|
Identifier: | JB/150/637/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
637 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d8 / f208 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
g & ep 1794 |
||
|
fr3 |
|||
|
1794 |
|||
|
50858 |
|||
