JB/150/674/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/150/674/001: Difference between revisions

Mfoutz (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p>In the existing Acts no provision is made for <lb/>this <add>occasional</add> demand for <add>a</add> double <del>licencing:</del> <del>inves</del> <add>scrutiny into character:</add> the provision is<lb/>therefore in that behalf imperfect.  This imperfect<lb/>provision is however what I have copied, because in so doing, I had precedent to bear<lb/>me out.  In the other case, I should have had<lb/>no such <unclear>precedent</unclear>, and the complication that would<lb/>have been necessary to <del>execute corr</del> supply<lb/>the deficiency, would on account of its novelty<lb/>have stood but an indifferent chance of being<lb/>well received.  But the defect <del>being</del> <add>having never been</add> pointed out,<lb/>whether <del>it should</del> the correction of it shall be<lb/>attempted, rests with those to whom it belongs<lb/>to judge.<lb/></p><p>The <del>practical result</del> <add>probable <del>influence</del> result</add> of th<del>e</del><add>is</add> defect <del>in question</del><lb/><del>with regard to</del> <add>in regard <del>an</del> to</add> practice, seems to be this:  viz:<lb/>that <add>(especially</add> if the <hi rend="underline">certificate</hi> be required) it will be extremely<lb/>difficult for a man to get a licence <del>in</del><lb/>any <del>place</del> fresh place of residence.  The effect of<lb/><add>this difficulty</add> upon the whole will perhaps not be very prejudicial <lb/>to the community at large:  since by this<lb/>means though honest men will  <del>in <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>in some instances</add><lb/>be excluded, <del>rogues and  vagabonds will be</del> <add>so will fugitive malefactors in other</add><lb/><del>excluded with them.</del> instances.<lb/></p><p><del>With regard to</del> <add>Upon the <del>result</del> whole, whatever may be</add> the degree of strictness that<lb/><del>may</del> come<add>s</add> to be observed, <del>both sides will</del> <add>the effect will be of</add><lb/><add>a mixed nature, the advantage lost in one way being</add><lb/><del>have their advantage and their disadvantages</del><lb/><add>compensated in another:</add> the greater the strictness, <add>so much</add> the better <del>in point of</del> <add>with a view to</add><lb/>police; the less the strictness, <add>so much</add> the better <del>for the</del> <add>with <del>for</del></add><del>revenue.</del> <add>a</add> view to revenue.<lb/></p>By the form of Notice given in the Schedule it<lb/>will be seen, how great the complication must be, if such<lb/> <note>notice</note><lb/><note>notice be required. <lb/> The result will therefore<lb/>be ( I should<lb/>suppose) that the <lb/>provision respecting<lb/>the notice will be struck<lb/>out, and consequently<lb/>this Form along with <lb/>it.</note><lb/><pb/>
<head>Police Bill</head>
 
<note><unclear>Offence</unclear><lb/>III Licensing<lb/>§ 3 continued</note>
 
<!-- Page crossed through -->
 
<p>In the existing Acts no provision is made for <lb/>this <add>occasional</add> demand for <add>a</add> double <del>licencing:</del> <del>inves</del> <add>scrutiny into character:</add> the provision is<lb/>therefore in that behalf imperfect.  This imperfect<lb/>provision is however what I have copied, because in so doing, I had precedent to bear<lb/>me out.  In the other case, I should have had<lb/>no such <unclear>practice</unclear>, and the complication that would<lb/>have been necessary to <del>execute corr</del> supply<lb/>the deficiency, would on account of its novelty<lb/>have stood but an indifferent chance of being<lb/>well received.  But the defect <del>being</del> <add>having never been</add> pointed out,<lb/>whether <del>it should</del> the correction of it shall be<lb/>attempted, rests with those to whom it belongs<lb/>to judge.</p>
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


<p>The <del>practical result</del> <add>probable <del>influence</del> result</add> of th<del>e</del><add>is</add> defect <del>in question</del><lb/><del>with regard to</del> <add>in regard <del>an</del> to</add> practice, seems to be this:  viz:<lb/>that <add>(especially</add> if the <hi rend="underline">certificate</hi> be required) it will be extremely<lb/>difficult for a man to get a licence <del>in</del><lb/>any <del>place</del> fresh place of residence.  The effect of<lb/><add>this difficulty</add> upon the whole will perhaps not be very prejudicial <lb/>to the community at large:  since by this<lb/>means though honest men will  <del>in certain occasions</del> <add>in some instances</add><lb/>be excluded, <del>rogues and  vagabonds will be</del> <add>so will fugitive malefactors in other</add><lb/><del>excluded with them.</del> instances.</p>


<p><del>With regard to</del> <add>Upon the <del>result</del> whole, whatever may be</add> the degree of strictness that<lb/><del>may</del> comes to be observed, <del>both sides will</del> <add>the effect will be of</add><lb/><add>a mixed nature, the advantage lost in one way being</add><lb/><del>have their advantage and their disadvantages</del><lb/><add>compensated in another:</add> the greater the strictness, <add>so much</add> the better <del>in point of</del> <add>with a view to</add><lb/>police; the less the strictness, <add>so much</add> the better <del>for the</del> <add>with <del>for</del></add><del>revenue.</del> <add>a</add> view to revenue.</p>


<p>By the form of Notice given in the Schedule it<lb/>will be seen, how great the complication must be, if such</p>
<note>notice<lb/>notice be required. <lb/> The result will therefore<lb/>be (I should<lb/>suppose) that the <lb/>provision respecting<lb/>the notice will be struck<lb/>out, and consequently<lb/>this Form along with <lb/>it.</note>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:44, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

Police Bill Offence
III Licensing
§ 3 continued

In the existing Acts no provision is made for
this occasional demand for a double licencing: inves scrutiny into character: the provision is
therefore in that behalf imperfect. This imperfect
provision is however what I have copied, because in so doing, I had precedent to bear
me out. In the other case, I should have had
no such practice, and the complication that would
have been necessary to execute corr supply
the deficiency, would on account of its novelty
have stood but an indifferent chance of being
well received. But the defect being having never been pointed out,
whether it should the correction of it shall be
attempted, rests with those to whom it belongs
to judge.

The practical result probable influence result of theis defect in question
with regard to in regard an to practice, seems to be this: viz:
that (especially if the certificate be required) it will be extremely
difficult for a man to get a licence in
any place fresh place of residence. The effect of
this difficulty upon the whole will perhaps not be very prejudicial
to the community at large: since by this
means though honest men will in certain occasions in some instances
be excluded, rogues and vagabonds will be so will fugitive malefactors in other
excluded with them. instances.

With regard to Upon the result whole, whatever may be the degree of strictness that
may comes to be observed, both sides will the effect will be of
a mixed nature, the advantage lost in one way being
have their advantage and their disadvantages
compensated in another: the greater the strictness, so much the better in point of with a view to
police; the less the strictness, so much the better for the with forrevenue. a view to revenue.

By the form of Notice given in the Schedule it
will be seen, how great the complication must be, if such

notice
notice be required.
The result will therefore
be (I should
suppose) that the
provision respecting
the notice will be struck
out, and consequently
this Form along with
it.



Identifier: | JB/150/674/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

150

Main Headings

police bill

Folio number

674

Info in main headings field

police bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d7 / f45

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

[[notes_public::"consult" [note in bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

50895

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in