★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/150/693/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/150/693/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>Not Now<lb/> | |||
Police Revenue Bill</head> | |||
<p>§. 10. [ 1 ] [ <hi rend="underline">To the end that</hi> ] This section <del>together <gap/></del><lb/>and the following I have taken the liberty to add for the<lb/>consideration of the author of the Instructions. The<lb/>reason of it is given in the Preamble, which may be<lb/>either retained or struck out, as may be deemed most<lb/>advisable. The distinctions in dress should be such<lb/>as are visible at the greatest distance: two colours<lb/>for example, as much contrasted as may be, alternating<lb/>in a very broad stripe. The hint of<lb/>prohibiting habiliments favourable to depredation, <lb/>that is, to <add>the</add> concealment of goods in large quantities,<lb/>is taken from the information accompanying the Instructions,<lb/>which speaks of these habiliments as <lb/>made use of for the purpose of depredation in<lb/>the existing order of things. <hi rend="underline">Uniforms</hi>, when<lb/><del>well adapted to</del> the particular purpose they have in<lb/>view is a useful one, and they are well adapted<lb/>to that purpose, are pleasing to the imagination as<lb/>well as to the eye, and have the general good effect<lb/>of familiarising men's minds to ideas of order and<lb/>good government.<lb/></p><p>The distinction between the <del>unif</del> <hi rend="underline">Lumper's</hi> uniform, and the <lb/><note><hi rend="underline">Hawker's</hi> uniform <lb/>should be as striking <lb/>as possible: both having <lb/>business on board the <lb/><hi rend="underline">ships</hi>, but the one having <lb/>business with the <hi rend="underline">Cargo</hi>, <lb/>the other having no <lb/>business to meddle with <lb/>it, or <add>with</add> any part of it.</note><lb/>§. 10 [ 2 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Not belonging to such classes</hi> ] If persons at<lb/>large were not <del>bound to abstain</del> <add>to be <hi rend="underline">restricted</hi></add> <hi rend="underline">from wearing</hi> these<lb/>distinctions, <del>as well as the persons</del> <add>while the particular persons in question are</add> <hi rend="underline">bound to wear</hi> them,<lb/>the <add>intended</add> distinction <del>would</del> <add>might</add> be obliterated: and, without such<lb/><del>prohibition</del> <add>restriction</add> the result would not be an improbable<lb/>one, since the persons who found their unlawful<lb/>designs impeded by the distinction, would neither<lb/>want motives nor means for engaging others to do <lb/>whatever <del> was not rendered <gap/> they could do</del> could be <lb/>done with safety towards the obliterating it.<lb/></p><pb/> | <p>§. 10. [ 1 ] [ <hi rend="underline">To the end that</hi> ] This section <del>together <gap/></del><lb/>and the following I have taken the liberty to add for the<lb/>consideration of the author of the Instructions. The<lb/>reason of it is given in the Preamble, which may be<lb/>either retained or struck out, as may be deemed most<lb/>advisable. The distinctions in dress should be such<lb/>as are visible at the greatest distance: two colours<lb/>for example, as much contrasted as may be, alternating<lb/>in a very broad stripe. The hint of<lb/>prohibiting habiliments favourable to depredation, <lb/>that is, to <add>the</add> concealment of goods in large quantities,<lb/>is taken from the information accompanying the Instructions,<lb/>which speaks of these habiliments as <lb/>made use of for the purpose of depredation in<lb/>the existing order of things. <hi rend="underline">Uniforms</hi>, when<lb/><del>well adapted to</del> the particular purpose they have in<lb/>view is a useful one, and they are well adapted<lb/>to that purpose, are pleasing to the imagination as<lb/>well as to the eye, and have the general good effect<lb/>of familiarising men's minds to ideas of order and<lb/>good government.<lb/></p><p>The distinction between the <del>unif</del> <hi rend="underline">Lumper's</hi> uniform, and the <lb/><note><hi rend="underline">Hawker's</hi> uniform <lb/>should be as striking <lb/>as possible: both having <lb/>business on board the <lb/><hi rend="underline">ships</hi>, but the one having <lb/>business with the <hi rend="underline">Cargo</hi>, <lb/>the other having no <lb/>business to meddle with <lb/>it, or <add>with</add> any part of it.</note><lb/>§. 10 [ 2 ] [ <hi rend="underline">Not belonging to such classes</hi> ] If persons at<lb/>large were not <del>bound to abstain</del> <add>to be <hi rend="underline">restricted</hi></add> <hi rend="underline">from wearing</hi> these<lb/>distinctions, <del>as well as the persons</del> <add>while the particular persons in question are</add> <hi rend="underline">bound to wear</hi> them,<lb/>the <add>intended</add> distinction <del>would</del> <add>might</add> be obliterated: and, without such<lb/><del>prohibition</del> <add>restriction</add> the result would not be an improbable<lb/>one, since the persons who found their unlawful<lb/>designs impeded by the distinction, would neither<lb/>want motives nor means for engaging others to do <lb/>whatever <del> was not rendered <gap/> they could do</del> could be <lb/>done with safety towards the obliterating it.<lb/></p><pb/> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
Not Now
Police Revenue Bill
§. 10. [ 1 ] [ To the end that ] This section together
and the following I have taken the liberty to add for the
consideration of the author of the Instructions. The
reason of it is given in the Preamble, which may be
either retained or struck out, as may be deemed most
advisable. The distinctions in dress should be such
as are visible at the greatest distance: two colours
for example, as much contrasted as may be, alternating
in a very broad stripe. The hint of
prohibiting habiliments favourable to depredation,
that is, to the concealment of goods in large quantities,
is taken from the information accompanying the Instructions,
which speaks of these habiliments as
made use of for the purpose of depredation in
the existing order of things. Uniforms, when
well adapted to the particular purpose they have in
view is a useful one, and they are well adapted
to that purpose, are pleasing to the imagination as
well as to the eye, and have the general good effect
of familiarising men's minds to ideas of order and
good government.
The distinction between the unif Lumper's uniform, and the
Hawker's uniform
should be as striking
as possible: both having
business on board the
ships, but the one having
business with the Cargo,
the other having no
business to meddle with
it, or with any part of it.
§. 10 [ 2 ] [ Not belonging to such classes ] If persons at
large were not bound to abstain to be restricted from wearing these
distinctions, as well as the persons while the particular persons in question are bound to wear them,
the intended distinction would might be obliterated: and, without such
prohibition restriction the result would not be an improbable
one, since the persons who found their unlawful
designs impeded by the distinction, would neither
want motives nor means for engaging others to do
whatever was not rendered they could do could be
done with safety towards the obliterating it.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/150/693/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 150. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
150 |
police bill |
||
|
693 |
police revenue bill |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d22 / f79 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
[[notes_public::"not now" [note in bentham's hand]]] |
50914 |
||
