★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p>1</p> | |||
<p>When separation<lb/> | |||
into classes was first<lb/> | |||
thought of, that<lb/> | |||
into companies<lb/> | |||
which supersedes<lb/> | |||
it was not. p.1</p> | |||
<p>2</p> | |||
<p>How far the common<lb/> | |||
plans push the<lb/> | |||
idea of separation<lb/> | |||
into classes. p.1.</p> | |||
<p>3</p> | |||
<p>Grounds for separation</p> | |||
<p>1 among males,<lb/> | |||
experience & and turbulence<lb/> | |||
p.2</p> | |||
<p>4</p> | |||
<p>2 — among females,<lb/> | |||
immodesty — p.2</p> | |||
<p>5</p> | |||
<p>Propriety of separating<lb/> | |||
old offenders<lb/> | |||
from raw. p. 2.</p> | |||
<p>As much as for<lb/> | |||
separating Debtors from<lb/> | |||
felons. <del><gap/></del></p> | |||
<p>6</p> | |||
<p>Insufficiencies of<lb/> | |||
such separation<lb/> | |||
considering the<lb/> | |||
association it involves | |||
p.3</p> | |||
<p>1 <gap/> <add>in respect of</add> raw offenders<lb/> | |||
excepted</p><pb/> | |||
<p>7</p> | |||
<p>1. in preventing<lb/> | |||
turbulence</p> | |||
<p>2. Case of daring<lb/> | |||
raw offenders. p.4</p> | |||
<p>8</p> | |||
<p>2. in preventing<lb/> | |||
mischievous instruction</p> | |||
<p>3. Case of Quiet<lb/> | |||
old offenders. p.5</p> | |||
<p>9</p> | |||
<p>4. Case of daring<lb/> | |||
old offenders. p.6</p> | |||
<p>10</p> | |||
<p>5 Case of House<lb/> | |||
-breakers p. 6</p> | |||
<p>11</p> | |||
<p>Females</p> | |||
<p>6. Case of decent<lb/> | |||
females</p> | |||
<p>7. Case of destitute<lb/> | |||
females</p> | |||
<p>Grounds of separation</p> | |||
<p>1. Danger of moral<lb/> | |||
corruption. p.7.</p> | |||
<p><del>12</del></p> | |||
<p>12</p> | |||
<p>2. Present uneasiness<lb/> | |||
to the uncorrupted.<lb/> | |||
p.9.</p><pb/> | |||
<p>13</p> | |||
<p>Grounds of separation<lb/> | |||
with respect<lb/> | |||
to males<lb/> | |||
why not applied<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/></del> to females<lb/> | |||
p.10</p> | |||
<p>14</p> | |||
<p>Those which<lb/> | |||
respect females<lb/> | |||
why not to <lb/> | |||
males. p.11</p> | |||
<p>15</p> | |||
<p>Inefficacy of<lb/> | |||
all separation<lb/> | |||
according to classes<lb/> | |||
owing to the<lb/> | |||
gradations and<lb/> | |||
diversities of<lb/> | |||
character in<lb/> | |||
the same class<lb/> | |||
being immeasurable<lb/> | |||
and undesirbable. p.11</p><pb/> | |||
<p>1</p> | |||
<p>Separation according<lb/> | |||
to Classes<lb/> | |||
essentially inadequate<lb/> | |||
p.1</p> | |||
<p>2</p> | |||
<p>Points already<lb/> | |||
proved</p> | |||
<p>1. My degree of<lb/> | |||
seclusion adequate</p> | |||
<p>2. inviolably<lb/> | |||
maintained</p> | |||
<p>3. More perfect than<lb/> | |||
any other p.1</p> | |||
<p>3</p> | |||
<p>Separation Walls<lb/> | |||
according to classes<lb/> | |||
exhibited in Plate<lb/> | |||
III — why. p.2</p> | |||
<p>4</p> | |||
<p>Heads of observation<lb/> | |||
for this<lb/> | |||
section. p.3</p> | |||
<p>5</p> | |||
<p>Superiority of<lb/> | |||
my mode of reparation <lb/> | |||
according<lb/> | |||
to classes over the<lb/> | |||
common plans.<lb/> | |||
p.3.</p> | |||
<p>Associations what<lb/> | |||
principally regretted<lb/> | |||
by Howard.</p> | |||
<p>6</p> | |||
<p>Inefficacy of the<lb/> | |||
separation presented<lb/> | |||
by the Penitentiary<lb/> | |||
Act in respect of<lb/> | |||
promiscuous association<lb/> | |||
p.4.</p><pb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1
When separation
into classes was first
thought of, that
into companies
which supersedes
it was not. p.1
2
How far the common
plans push the
idea of separation
into classes. p.1.
3
Grounds for separation
1 among males,
experience & and turbulence
p.2
4
2 — among females,
immodesty — p.2
5
Propriety of separating
old offenders
from raw. p. 2.
As much as for
separating Debtors from
felons.
6
Insufficiencies of
such separation
considering the
association it involves
p.3
1 in respect of raw offenders
excepted
---page break---
7
1. in preventing
turbulence
2. Case of daring
raw offenders. p.4
8
2. in preventing
mischievous instruction
3. Case of Quiet
old offenders. p.5
9
4. Case of daring
old offenders. p.6
10
5 Case of House
-breakers p. 6
11
Females
6. Case of decent
females
7. Case of destitute
females
Grounds of separation
1. Danger of moral
corruption. p.7.
12
12
2. Present uneasiness
to the uncorrupted.
p.9.
---page break---
13
Grounds of separation
with respect
to males
why not applied
to females
p.10
14
Those which
respect females
why not to
males. p.11
15
Inefficacy of
all separation
according to classes
owing to the
gradations and
diversities of
character in
the same class
being immeasurable
and undesirbable. p.11
---page break---
1
Separation according
to Classes
essentially inadequate
p.1
2
Points already
proved
1. My degree of
seclusion adequate
2. inviolably
maintained
3. More perfect than
any other p.1
3
Separation Walls
according to classes
exhibited in Plate
III — why. p.2
4
Heads of observation
for this
section. p.3
5
Superiority of
my mode of reparation
according
to classes over the
common plans.
p.3.
Associations what
principally regretted
by Howard.
6
Inefficacy of the
separation presented
by the Penitentiary
Act in respect of
promiscuous association
p.4.
---page break---
|
Identifier: | JB/157/040/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 157. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-15, 1-18, 18a, 19-20, 1-9 |
|||
|
157 |
panopticon |
||
|
040 |
panopt. separate classes contents |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::l munn [britannia with shield emblem]]] |
||
|
benjamin constant |
|||
|
53410 |
|||
