JB/537/300/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/537/300/001: Difference between revisions

TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<p> "Diacentric" you may keep; since you have a passion for it:<lb/>any thing for a little peace and quietness.  Now you <hi rend="underline">tell</hi> me <lb/>what you want it for, I know &#x2014; <sic>'tis</sic> the best way in the world <lb/>of <unclear>letting</unclear> <unclear>one</unclear>.  It will answer your purpose very well as <lb/>a term inclusive and superordinate to <add> more ample than (if you please)</add> the proper signification <lb/>of the word diameter, and as such capable of being put<lb/>in <sic>contradistinction</sic> to it.  A Diameter is a line struck <add> that passes</add>  <hi rend="underline">dead</hi> <lb/> through or across the figure in question viz: a circle; and <lb/>which <foreign> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi> </foreign> measures it; that is determines, and is determined <lb/>in it's own magnitude by the size <add> magnitude</add> of, it.  Diacentric<lb/>is a line that is struck through the figure viz: <lb/>through the <sic>center</sic> of the figure, whether it measures it or <lb/>not: it may fall short of the boundary of the figure, or <lb/>stretch beyond it, or do both: viz: the one by one of it's ends, <lb/>the other, by the other.  Hence you get an <hi rend="underline">interior</hi> part <lb/>of it, and an <hi rend="underline">exterior
<p> "Diacentric" you may keep; since you have a passion for it:<lb/>any thing for a little peace and quietness.  Now you <hi rend="underline">tell</hi> me <lb/>what you want it for, I know &#x2014; <sic>'tis</sic> the best way in the world <lb/>of <unclear>letting</unclear> <unclear>one</unclear>.  It will answer your purpose very well as <lb/>a term inclusive of and superordinate to <add> more ample than (if you please)</add> the proper signification <lb/>of the word diameter; and as such capable of being put<lb/>in contradistinction to it.  A Diameter is a line struck <add> that passes</add>  <foreign><hi rend="underline">διά</hi></foreign> <lb/> through or across the figure in question viz: a circle; and <lb/>which <unclear><foreign> <hi rend="underline">μετρςυει</hi> </foreign></unclear> measures it; that is determines, and is determined <lb/>in it's own magnitude by the size <add> magnitude</add> of, it.  Diacentric<lb/>is a line that is struck through the figure viz: <lb/>through the center of the figure, whether it measures it or <lb/>not: it may fall short of the boundary of the figure, or <lb/>stretch beyond it, or do both: viz: the one by one of it's ends, <lb/>the other, by the other.  Hence you get an <hi rend="underline">interior</hi> part <lb/>of it, and an <hi rend="underline">exterior
</hi> &#x2014; When you have fixed your <lb/>Circle in it's position you may have a perpendicular <lb/>diacentric, and an horizontal diacentric &#x2014; you might have<lb/>a superior Semicircle (or Semicircumference which is the <lb/>bare line that bounds the figure) and an inferior one &#x2014; a <lb/>right and a left &#x2014; a <foreign><unclear>dextrorsum</unclear></foreign> - (or right-hand wise] &#x2014; ascending</p>
</hi> &#x2014; When you have fixed your <lb/>Circle in it's position you may have a perpendicular <lb/>diacentric, and an horizontal diacentric &#x2014; you might have<lb/>a superior Semicircle (or Semicircumference which is the <lb/>bare line that bounds the figure) and an inferior one &#x2014; a <lb/>right and a left &#x2014; a <foreign>dextrorsum</foreign> &#x2014; (or right-hand wise] &#x2014; ascending</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:48, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

"Diacentric" you may keep; since you have a passion for it:
any thing for a little peace and quietness. Now you tell me
what you want it for, I know — 'tis the best way in the world
of letting one. It will answer your purpose very well as
a term inclusive of and superordinate to more ample than (if you please) the proper signification
of the word diameter; and as such capable of being put
in contradistinction to it. A Diameter is a line struck that passes διά
through or across the figure in question viz: a circle; and
which μετρςυει measures it; that is determines, and is determined
in it's own magnitude by the size magnitude of, it. Diacentric
is a line that is struck through the figure viz:
through the center of the figure, whether it measures it or
not: it may fall short of the boundary of the figure, or
stretch beyond it, or do both: viz: the one by one of it's ends,
the other, by the other. Hence you get an interior part
of it, and an exterior — When you have fixed your
Circle in it's position you may have a perpendicular
diacentric, and an horizontal diacentric — you might have
a superior Semicircle (or Semicircumference which is the
bare line that bounds the figure) and an inferior one — a
right and a left — a dextrorsum — (or right-hand wise] — ascending



Identifier: | JB/537/300/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 537.

Date_1

1774-08-??

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

537

Main Headings

Folio number

300

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in