★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p> [come] sennight (as my Grandmother used to say. I will put it<lb/> off <sic>till</sic> the Monday following: I will stay at Whitchurch<lb/> <sic>till</sic> the Monday after that (this day 3 weeks) by which time <lb/> I suppose you would be able to meet me at Totten in <lb/> the manner you proposed.</p> <p> For "<hi rend="underline">each to each</hi>" say "<hi rend="underline">each to its' correspondent one</hi> " <lb/><hi rend="underline">Each <add> equal</add> to each</hi> spoken of the two pairs of any-things is <lb/>properly speaking <hi rend="underline">all four equal</hi>. "<hi rend="underline">Either to either</hi>", <lb/> is to this purpose the same as "<hi rend="underline">each to each</hi>". I say to <lb/> <hi rend="underline">this</hi> purpose — for to <hi rend="underline">another</hi> it is not. take an example. <lb/>"I have a pear and an apple: you have a pear and <lb/> "an apple: you shall have mine, <hi rend="underline">either</hi> of them. What <lb/>do I mean by that? <add> this. viz: </add> you may have the pear, but not the <lb/>apple: or the apple but not the pear: <hi rend="underline">which</hi> you will <lb/>but not <hi rend="underline">both</hi> <gap/> had I said "<hi rend="underline">each</hi>" of them, <sic>'twould</sic> have been <lb/>the same as if I had said "<hi rend="underline">both</hi>" On the other hand if I <lb/> said My pear and my apple are <hi rend="underline">equal</hi> to your pear and your apple, <hi rend="underline">either to either</hi> <sic>'twould</sic> have been the same<lb/>as if I had said each to each: <del>that</del> in which case they are <lb/>all four equal taken separately: and therefore <hi rend="underline">both</hi> mine <add> taken together</add> equal </p> <!-- | <p> [come] sennight (as my Grandmother used to say. I will put it<lb/> off <sic>till</sic> the Monday following: I will stay at Whitchurch<lb/> <sic>till</sic> the Monday after that (this day 3 weeks) by which time <lb/> I suppose you would be able to meet me at Totten in <lb/> the manner you proposed.</p> <p> For "<hi rend="underline">each to each</hi>" say "<hi rend="underline">each to its' correspondent one</hi> " <lb/><hi rend="underline">Each <add> equal</add> to each</hi> spoken of the two pairs of any-things is <lb/>properly speaking <hi rend="underline">all four equal</hi>. "<hi rend="underline">Either to either</hi>", <lb/> is to this purpose the same as "<hi rend="underline">each to each</hi>". I say to <lb/> <hi rend="underline">this</hi> purpose — for to <hi rend="underline">another</hi> it is not. take an example. <lb/>"I have a pear and an apple: you have a pear and <lb/> "an apple: you shall have mine, <hi rend="underline">either</hi> of them. What <lb/>do I mean by that? <add> this. viz: </add> you may have the pear, but not the <lb/>apple: or the apple but not the pear: <hi rend="underline">which</hi> you will <lb/>but not <hi rend="underline">both</hi> <gap/> had I said "<hi rend="underline">each</hi>" of them, <sic>'twould</sic> have been <lb/>the same as if I had said "<hi rend="underline">both</hi>" On the other hand if I <lb/> said My pear and my apple are <hi rend="underline">equal</hi> to your pear and your apple, <hi rend="underline">either to either</hi> <sic>'twould</sic> have been the same<lb/>as if I had said each to each: <del>that</del> in which case they are <lb/>all four equal taken separately: and therefore <hi rend="underline">both</hi> mine <add> taken together</add> equal </p> <!-- overwriting on the right hand side of the page is from 303/001 and is transcribed there --> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
[come] sennight (as my Grandmother used to say. I will put it
off till the Monday following: I will stay at Whitchurch
till the Monday after that (this day 3 weeks) by which time
I suppose you would be able to meet me at Totten in
the manner you proposed.
For "each to each" say "each to its' correspondent one "
Each equal to each spoken of the two pairs of any-things is
properly speaking all four equal. "Either to either",
is to this purpose the same as "each to each". I say to
this purpose — for to another it is not. take an example.
"I have a pear and an apple: you have a pear and
"an apple: you shall have mine, either of them. What
do I mean by that? this. viz: you may have the pear, but not the
apple: or the apple but not the pear: which you will
but not both had I said "each" of them, 'twould have been
the same as if I had said "both" On the other hand if I
said My pear and my apple are equal to your pear and your apple, either to either 'twould have been the same
as if I had said each to each: that in which case they are
all four equal taken separately: and therefore both mine taken together equal
|
Identifier: | JB/537/302/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 537. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1774-??-?? |
|||
|
537 |
|||
|
302 |
|||
|
002 |
|||
|
Correspondence |
|||
|
Jeremy Bentham |
|||
