JB/539/312/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/539/312/002: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p> outstay that term any time to signify I will contrive to let you have <lb/> a copy.</p>
 
<p> The observation made in your second letter with relation to Sam's <lb/> throwing out to me the idea of engaging <hi rend="underline">Mosberry
</hi> <sic>admitts</sic> of a very <lb/> satisfactory answer: the letter though addressed to me, was written for <lb/> Lord Shelburne: nor <del>would</del> <add> was</add> there to be any question about Mosberry's<lb/> going, but upon the condition of his being sent on the account and <lb/> in the pay of government; which might very well have taken place<lb/> <add> if necessary, as Sam proposed</add> without his knowing who the money came from.  This consideration<lb/> of the letters being an ostensible one, it will be necessary to bear in <lb/> mind throughout, in order to put a right construction upon several<lb/> passages in <del>his letter</del> it: but all these are matters that will very <lb/> well wait for our discussion <sic>till</sic> we meet.</p>
<p> As to the question concerning the personality of his great friend<lb/> whom he has it in his choice to close with, my inference concerning <lb/> Dimidoff was drawn <add>principally</add> from the very passage from which you drew the <lb/> contrary one.  I could not very well imagine to whom the epithet<lb/> of the greatest proprietor in the whole Empire could well belong to <lb/> unless it were to a man who in his life could afford to spend £150,000</p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:51, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

outstay that term any time to signify I will contrive to let you have
a copy.

The observation made in your second letter with relation to Sam's
throwing out to me the idea of engaging Mosberry admitts of a very
satisfactory answer: the letter though addressed to me, was written for
Lord Shelburne: nor would was there to be any question about Mosberry's
going, but upon the condition of his being sent on the account and
in the pay of government; which might very well have taken place
if necessary, as Sam proposed without his knowing who the money came from. This consideration
of the letters being an ostensible one, it will be necessary to bear in
mind throughout, in order to put a right construction upon several
passages in his letter it: but all these are matters that will very
well wait for our discussion till we meet.

As to the question concerning the personality of his great friend
whom he has it in his choice to close with, my inference concerning
Dimidoff was drawn principally from the very passage from which you drew the
contrary one. I could not very well imagine to whom the epithet
of the greatest proprietor in the whole Empire could well belong to
unless it were to a man who in his life could afford to spend £150,000



Identifier: | JB/539/312/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 539.

Date_1

1782-11-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

539

Main Headings

Folio number

312

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

Correspondence

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in