JB/550/258/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/550/258/001: Difference between revisions

Aj (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/550/258/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/550/258/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<lb/>92<lb/> public works : it can hardly be set down as <unclear>less</unclear> than 5 years <lb/> even exclusive of the now current year<lb/> Upon the Panopticon plan, the establishment might<lb/> and would be completed in one year.  <unclear>Welneys Drarcy</unclear> Lane<lb/> Theatre.  Upon an establishment of this kind the allow<lb/> ance of a sum any thing near so large <gap/> £300000<lb/> within the space of one year would naturally be grudged.<lb/> It might not be grudged if the £ 300000, even reduced<lb/> to 100000<lb/>  
 
the only possible resource would be on the part of my Brother<lb/> and myself, a public declaration, where by<gap/> as in such <unclear>case</unclear><lb/> character could be pledged to the <unclear>sourcing</unclear> <gap/> <unclear>questionable reading</unclear><lb/> any addition to the sum of money <gap/> required.<lb/>  
 
In regard to the <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> the existence of <gap/> under the <unclear>course</unclear> <lb/> of proceeding which is customarily <unclear>pursued</unclear> in relation to public<lb/> works and which in the instance of the proposed <unclear>Non.</unclear> Panopticon<lb/> plan is actually pursued may however uncertain the <unclear><lb/>questionable reading</unclear><lb/>  <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> be looked upon as being to <unclear>questionable reading</unclear><lb/> matter of absolute certainty.  I would <unclear>venture</unclear> to <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> <lb/> your <unclear>Lordship
<p>92</p>
</unclear> and through  your Lordship with your Lordship <lb/> approbation to W <unclear>Vansittart</unclear>, whether to <unclear>questionable reading</unclear> in favouring <lb/> an expectation in relation to it, it might not be of <unclear><lb/>questionable reading</unclear> have an account taken of the difference between expenses<lb/> per estimate and expence <unclear>are per experience</unclear>, in the instance<lb/> of public work that have been carried on at the public expense<lb/> <unclear>for</unclear> a certain <unclear>number of years back.</unclear><lb/>
<p>public works : it can hardly be set down at less than 5 years <lb/> even exclusive of the now current year<lb/></p>
<gap/> character of a <gap/> economy applicable <unclear>questionable reading</unclear><lb/>
<p>Upon the Panopticon plan, the establishment might<lb/> and would be completed in one year.  Witness Drury Lane<lb/> Theatre.  Upon an establishment of this kind the allowance<lb/> of a sum any thing near so large as £300000<lb/> within the space of one year would naturally be grudged.<lb/></p>
<p>It might not be grudged if the £ 300,000, even reduced<lb/> to £100000<lb/></p>
<p>the only possible resource would be on the part of my Brother<lb/> and myself, a public declaration, whereby <gap/> as in such case<lb/> character could be pledged to the <unclear>securing</unclear> <gap/> <gap/> against <lb/> any addition to the sum of money <gap/> required.<lb/> </p>
<p>In regard to the excess the existence of <gap/> under the course <lb/> of proceeding which is customarily pursued in relation to public<lb/> works and which in the instance of the proposed <unclear>Non.</unclear> Panopticon<lb/> plan is actually pursued may however uncertain the amount<lb/><del>may to some amount</del> be looked upon as being to some amount<lb/> matter of absolute certainty.  I would venture to submitt to <lb/> your Lordship and through  your Lordship with your Lordship <lb/> approbation to M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Vansittart, whether to assist  in forming<lb/> an expectation in relation to it, it might not be of use to<lb/>have an account taken of the difference between expences<lb/> per estimate and expence as per experience, in the instance<lb/> of such public work as have been carried on at the public expence<lb/> for a certain number of years back.<lb/></p>
<p><gap/> character of a <gap/> of economy applicable in<lb/></p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 10:58, 4 February 2020

Click Here To Edit


92

public works : it can hardly be set down at less than 5 years
even exclusive of the now current year

Upon the Panopticon plan, the establishment might
and would be completed in one year. Witness Drury Lane
Theatre. Upon an establishment of this kind the allowance
of a sum any thing near so large as £300000
within the space of one year would naturally be grudged.

It might not be grudged if the £ 300,000, even reduced
to £100000

the only possible resource would be on the part of my Brother
and myself, a public declaration, whereby as in such case
character could be pledged to the securing against
any addition to the sum of money required.

In regard to the excess the existence of under the course
of proceeding which is customarily pursued in relation to public
works and which in the instance of the proposed Non. Panopticon
plan is actually pursued may however uncertain the amount
may to some amount be looked upon as being to some amount
matter of absolute certainty. I would venture to submitt to
your Lordship and through your Lordship with your Lordship
approbation to Mr Vansittart, whether to assist in forming
an expectation in relation to it, it might not be of use to
have an account taken of the difference between expences
per estimate and expence as per experience, in the instance
of such public work as have been carried on at the public expence
for a certain number of years back.

character of a of economy applicable in


Identifier: | JB/550/258/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 550.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

550

Main Headings

Folio number

258

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Number of Pages

Recto/Verso

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in