JB/063/012/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/063/012/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/063/012/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head> 1) <sic>PUB. OFF.</sic></head> <p><note>Rebellion.</note></p> <p>High Treason, <add>Rebellions</add> any not done in the intention of<lb/>persisting in <add>maintaining one's self in</add> <del>op</del> disobedience to the Supreme power<lb/>by <hi rend="underline">open force</hi>.</p> <p>By the supreme power is meant the persons exercising<lb/> the supreme power for the time being.</p> <p>The Riot Act in it's design a Law against Rebellion.</p> <p>So the Law against tumultuous petitioning.</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p><note> Rebellion x Treason.<lb/><sic>Punishm:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic></note></p> <p>Rebels are <add>more</add> hated not <add>than</add> despised. Traitors are <del>more</del> <add>as</add><lb/>much despised as hated.</p> <p> <del>Rebels then</del><lb/> Traitors therefore may be punished as <hi rend="underline">Malefactors</hi><lb/>with aggravated death.   Rebels ought only to be<lb/>punished as <hi rend="underline">enemies</hi> with simple death.   With<lb/>Death rather as the most effectual kind of <hi rend="underline">disablement</hi><lb/>than in any other view. Disablement being<lb/> <add>in evolved nations at war</add> the only end of combat.</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p><note><del><sic>Leudness</sic></del> <add>Morality.</add><lb/> Incontinence.</note></p> <p><del>Origin of the</del> Indignation of moralists against <sic>Leudness</sic><lb/>founded originally in Christianity.</p> <p><del>this</del> The idea of purity &amp; impurity &#x2014; a vague one.<lb/><add>Selfish</add> Motives for entertaining an indignation more than proportional<lb/> to the mischief.   Envy &amp; Parsimony &amp;c.</p> <p>Of the indignation expressed by moralists against vices of<lb/> this class a great part seems to be grounded in <del>a p</del> <add> a notion</add> <lb/>well or ill grounded of their peculiar repugnance to the<lb/>doctrines <add>precepts</add> of the Christian Religion.   <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>Yet <del>from the</del></add><lb/><del>discourses</del> neither from the conduct nor the discourses<lb/>of <del>the</del> <add>its</add> divine Author himself is any thing very <del>positive</del> <add>explicit</add> <lb/>on this head is very <sic>emphatical</sic>  to be collected.   One <lb/> <add>remarkable <del>ever</del></add> </p>       
<head> 1) <sic>PUB. OFF.</sic></head> <p><note>Rebellion.</note></p> <p>High Treason, <add>Rebellions</add> any not done in the intention of<lb/>persisting in <add>maintaining one's self in</add> <del>op</del> disobedience to the Supreme power<lb/>by <hi rend="underline">open force</hi>.</p> <p>By the supreme power is meant the persons exercising<lb/> the supreme power for the time being.</p> <p>The Riot Act in it's design a Law against Rebellion.</p> <p>So the Law against tumultuous petitioning.</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p><note> Rebellion x Treason.<lb/><sic>Punishm:<hi rend="superscript">t</hi></sic></note></p> <p>Rebels are <add>more</add> hated not <add>than</add> despised. Traitors are <del>more</del> <add>as</add><lb/>much despised as hated.</p> <p> <del>Rebels then</del><lb/> Traitors therefore may be punished as <hi rend="underline">Malefactors</hi><lb/>with aggravated death. Rebels ought only to be<lb/>punished as <hi rend="underline">enemies</hi> with simple death. With<lb/>Death rather as the most effectual kind of <hi rend="underline">disablement</hi><lb/>than in any other view. Disablement being<lb/> <add>in evolved nations at war</add> the only end of combat.</p> <!-- line across the page --> <p><note><del><sic>Leudness</sic></del> <add>Morality.</add><lb/> Incontinence.</note></p> <p><del>Origin of the</del> Indignation of moralists against <sic>Leudness</sic><lb/>founded originally in Christianity.</p> <p><del>this</del> The idea of purity &amp; impurity &#x2014; a vague one.<lb/><add>Selfish</add> Motives for entertaining an indignation more than proportional<lb/> to the mischief. Envy &amp; Parsimony &amp;c.</p> <p>Of the indignation expressed by moralists against vices of<lb/> this class a great part seems to be grounded in <del>a p</del> <add> a notion</add> <lb/>well or ill grounded of their peculiar repugnance to the<lb/>doctrines <add>precepts</add> of the Christian Religion. <del><gap/> <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>Yet <del>from the</del></add><lb/><del>discourses</del> neither from the conduct nor the discourses<lb/>of <del>the</del> <add>its</add> divine Author himself is any thing very <del>positive</del> <add>explicit</add> <lb/>on this head is very <sic>emphatical</sic>  to be collected. One <lb/> <add>remarkable <del>ever</del></add> </p>       






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:03, 13 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1) PUB. OFF.

Rebellion.

High Treason, Rebellions any not done in the intention of
persisting in maintaining one's self in op disobedience to the Supreme power
by open force.

By the supreme power is meant the persons exercising
the supreme power for the time being.

The Riot Act in it's design a Law against Rebellion.

So the Law against tumultuous petitioning.

Rebellion x Treason.
Punishm:t

Rebels are more hated not than despised. Traitors are more as
much despised as hated.

Rebels then
Traitors therefore may be punished as Malefactors
with aggravated death. Rebels ought only to be
punished as enemies with simple death. With
Death rather as the most effectual kind of disablement
than in any other view. Disablement being
in evolved nations at war the only end of combat.

Leudness Morality.
Incontinence.

Origin of the Indignation of moralists against Leudness
founded originally in Christianity.

this The idea of purity & impurity — a vague one.
Selfish Motives for entertaining an indignation more than proportional
to the mischief. Envy & Parsimony &c.

Of the indignation expressed by moralists against vices of
this class a great part seems to be grounded in a p a notion
well or ill grounded of their peculiar repugnance to the
doctrines precepts of the Christian Religion. Yet from the
discourses neither from the conduct nor the discourses
of the its divine Author himself is any thing very positive explicit
on this head is very emphatical to be collected. One
remarkable ever




Identifier: | JB/063/012/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

063

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

pub. off

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

b1 / a2 / b3 / a4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[gr with crown motif] propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20201

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in