★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 20</head> <!-- in pencil --><p>Radicalism not dangerous <note>V. Dangers real source</note><lb/>1 <note> § Not lower but higher dangerous<lb/>§.1 Positions <gap/></note></p> <p>§. What danger there is, is — not from <del><gap/></del> radicalism or<lb/>democracy, but from Monarchy and Aristocracy.</p> <p>§</p> <p>If neither in the system expressed by the words radical<lb/> reform — <add>if</add> neither in the system itself nor in the means necessary<lb/> to the establishing of it there is danger in<lb/> what else <add>other sense</add> then <!-- brackets in pencil --> (it may be asked) shall we look <add>are we to look</add> for<lb/>those dangers to which government is exposed? to what<lb/>other source <add>object</add> shall we look for the cause of those evils<lb/>of which the existence is unhappily so unquestionable,<lb/> of those evils under which the country has been so long<lb/>suffering, and continues suffering at this moment? I<lb/><unclear>know</unclear> — to the absence of radical reform, and nothing<lb/> else. By <del>d</del> radical reform and nothing <del>else</del> less<lb/>can the people be placed in a state of tolerable security<lb/> against injury in all shapes at the hand of their rulers</p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil --> [<del>Of changes</del> How so? For what reason? Even because]<lb/>If <add>The case is — the</add> danger to national felicity the source is — always<lb/> in the disposition of the higher, never in that of the lower<lb/>rulers.</p> <p> To be <add>That it may be</add> the more <del><gap/></del> clearly apprehended <add>it may</add> the proposition<lb/>may perhaps require to be <add> perhaps be of use that the proposition be</add> a little more developed<lb/>For this | <head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 20</head> <!-- in pencil --><p>Radicalism not dangerous <note>V. Dangers real source</note><lb/>1 <note> § Not lower but higher dangerous<lb/>§.1 Positions <gap/></note></p> <p>§. What danger there is, is — not from <del><gap/></del> radicalism or<lb/>democracy, but from Monarchy and Aristocracy.</p> <p>§</p> <p>If neither in the system expressed by the words radical<lb/> reform — <add>if</add> neither in the system itself nor in the means necessary<lb/> to the establishing of it there is danger in<lb/> what else <add>other sense</add> then <!-- brackets in pencil --> (it may be asked) shall we look <add>are we to look</add> for<lb/>those dangers to which government is exposed? to what<lb/>other source <add>object</add> shall we look for the cause of those evils<lb/>of which the existence is unhappily so unquestionable,<lb/> of those evils under which the country has been so long<lb/>suffering, and continues suffering at this moment? I<lb/><unclear>know</unclear> — to the absence of radical reform, and nothing<lb/> else. By <del>d</del> radical reform and nothing <del>else</del> less<lb/>can the people be placed in a state of tolerable security<lb/> against injury in all shapes at the hand of their rulers</p> <p><!-- brackets in pencil --> [<del>Of changes</del> How so? For what reason? Even because]<lb/>If <add>The case is — the</add> danger to national felicity the source is — always<lb/> in the disposition of the higher, never in that of the lower<lb/>rulers.</p> <p> To be <add>That it may be</add> the more <del><gap/></del> clearly apprehended <add>it may</add> the proposition<lb/>may perhaps require to be <add> perhaps be of use that the proposition be</add> a little more developed<lb/>For this purpose take the following subordinate <add>ones</add> position<lb/> may perhaps be found to serve.</p> | ||
1820 Apr. 20
Radicalism not dangerous V. Dangers real source
1 § Not lower but higher dangerous
§.1 Positions
§. What danger there is, is — not from radicalism or
democracy, but from Monarchy and Aristocracy.
§
If neither in the system expressed by the words radical
reform — if neither in the system itself nor in the means necessary
to the establishing of it there is danger in
what else other sense then (it may be asked) shall we look are we to look for
those dangers to which government is exposed? to what
other source object shall we look for the cause of those evils
of which the existence is unhappily so unquestionable,
of those evils under which the country has been so long
suffering, and continues suffering at this moment? I
know — to the absence of radical reform, and nothing
else. By d radical reform and nothing else less
can the people be placed in a state of tolerable security
against injury in all shapes at the hand of their rulers
[Of changes How so? For what reason? Even because]
If The case is — the danger to national felicity the source is — always
in the disposition of the higher, never in that of the lower
rulers.
To be That it may be the more clearly apprehended it may the proposition
may perhaps require to be perhaps be of use that the proposition be a little more developed
For this purpose take the following subordinate ones position
may perhaps be found to serve.
|
Identifier: | JB/137/247/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-04-20 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
247 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
46964 |
|||
