JB/137/251/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/251/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto loaded
 
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 12<lb/> Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><note>II Experience III British<lb/>
recent</note><lb/>2 <note>&sect;.1. Actual dangers none</note></p> <p>So much for <add>past</add> possibilities: <del>so <gap/></del> But how stands the matter<lb/> in regard to <add>point of</add> fact? That in no instance where men<lb/>have met for the purpose of promoting parliamentary reform<lb/>has any such injury to person or property been committed<lb/>or for aught that appears been ever intended to be committed<lb/>Injuries to person, yes: injuries to property, yes: but <del>the</del> by<lb/>whom?  Answer not by reformists but by anti reformists,<lb/>not by men unarmed with power: <add>naked/destitute of all power</add> but <del>with</del> by men <sic>cloathed</sic> <lb/>with power, and abusing it as under such a constitution, power<lb/> can <del>scarce ever</del> not in the nature of things fail to be abundantly<lb/> abused. Best of this under another head.</p> <p>The instances which present themselves as <del>bef</del> belonging to<lb/>this head are the following.</p> <p>&#9758; Here collect and number them from the points of the <gap/> in<lb/>1. the order of time: mentioning time and place<lb/> 1. The Smithfield meeting</p>     






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:49, 17 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Apr. 12
Radicalism not dangerous

II Experience III British
recent

2 §.1. Actual dangers none

So much for past possibilities: so But how stands the matter
in regard to point of fact? That in no instance where men
have met for the purpose of promoting parliamentary reform
has any such injury to person or property been committed
or for aught that appears been ever intended to be committed
Injuries to person, yes: injuries to property, yes: but the by
whom? Answer not by reformists but by anti reformists,
not by men unarmed with power: naked/destitute of all power but with by men cloathed
with power, and abusing it as under such a constitution, power
can scarce ever not in the nature of things fail to be abundantly
abused. Best of this under another head.

The instances which present themselves as bef belonging to
this head are the following.

☞ Here collect and number them from the points of the in
1. the order of time: mentioning time and place
1. The Smithfield meeting




Identifier: | JB/137/251/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-04-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

251

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

46968

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in