JB/137/253/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/137/253/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 22.</head><!-- in pencil --> <p>Radicalism not dangerous<lb/>(2) <note>&sect; Rulers disregard<lb/>1. Public 2. Appeal</note></p> <p>A more <sic>compleat</sic> demonstration and not be desired<lb/>than those who wish for <del>pr</del> radical reform may see<lb/>in it of the rustiness <add>imperfection</add> of the Constitution, of the con<gap/>rality<lb/> of the ruling few &#x2014; <add>at all times</add> of their disregard for justice of<lb/>their disregard for the welfare of the subject many, of their<lb/> disregard for religion, and of the hypocrisy with which<lb/>their professions of regard for it have been accompanied.</p> <p><note>[+]<lb/.of the depravity of the rule<lb/> of action which <hi rend="superscript">[1]</hi> is in<lb/> the shape of Common<lb/>Law</note></p> <p>On condition of finding a ruffian <add>a hired assassin</add> who for him<lb/>is content to hazard his life in the endeavour to <gap/><lb/>either such an <gap/> on himself, is another man who<lb/>has given him no offence, a man who has not right to<lb/>it and is <gap/> of having no right to it may require<lb/>an estate to any <gap/>. Until the act which passed<lb/> <sic>t'other</sic> day for the abolition of it, this <add>next</add> was a part of<lb/>the two, such was the extent of the law of real property,<lb/>such was the state of Judicial procedure: Ans this was<lb/>by Common Law: such then as to the points in question was the <note>state <add>condition</add> and character<lb/>of the Common Law</note>/p> <p> Now then <del>of</del> supposing as I do of the conduct of<lb/>men in power so far as concerns the abolition of their point<lb/>of law, which must have been my opinion of their<lb/>conduct in respect <add>relation</add> to those same points <gap/> to that time?<lb/><del>What is it that</del> where is the <gap/> the existence of which<lb/>they are not prepared to regard <add>either</add> with complacency <del>if</del> <add>or</add> with<lb/>indifference &#x2014; they who <del>for <gap/> <gap/></del> <add><gap/> to that manner</add> could suffer<lb/> an abomination such as that so <gap/> as point of the law?</p> <p>A system which without any reclamation on the part<lb/>of those best acquainted with it could <gap/> an abomination<lb/> <gap/> as that, what are the other abominations which<lb/> it may not with reason be expected <del>be</del> still to offer to<lb/>view were the best eyes disposed to look at them? Yet<lb/>it is with abomination such as these contained in it, that, by the<lb/> <add>unanimous</add> <lb/><!-- continues in margin --> unanimous voice of<lb/>all those who <del>f</del> behold<lb/> their own profit in the<lb/>abuses of it, this system<lb/> has all along been<lb/><del><gap/> and</del> stated the<lb/>perfection of reason, and<lb/> so declared and certified.</p>   
<head>1820 <sic>Apr.</sic> 22.</head><!-- in pencil --> <p>Radicalism not dangerous<lb/>(2) <note>&sect; Rulers disregard<lb/>1. Public 2. Appeal</note></p> <p>A more <sic>compleat</sic> demonstration and not be desired<lb/>than those who wish for <del>pr</del> radical reform may see<lb/>in it of the rustiness <add>imperfection</add> of the Constitution, of the immorality<lb/> of the ruling few &#x2014; <add>at all times</add> of their disregard for justice of<lb/>their disregard for the welfare of the subject many, of their<lb/> disregard for religion, and of the hypocrisy with which<lb/>their professions of regard for it have been accompanied.</p>  
 
<p><note>[+]<lb/>of the depravity of<lb/>that part of the rule<lb/> of action which <hi rend="superscript">[1]</hi> is in<lb/> the shape of Common<lb/>Law</note></p> <p>On condition of finding a ruffian <add>a hired assassin</add> who for him<lb/>is content to hazard his life in the endeavour to kill<lb/>either such an assassin or himself, is another man who<lb/>has given him no offence, a man who has no right to<lb/>it and is conscious of having no right to it may acquire<lb/>an estate to any magnitude. Until the act which passed<lb/> <sic>t'other</sic> day for the abolition of it, this <add>such</add> was a part of<lb/>the two, such was the extent of the law of real property,<lb/>such was the state of Judicial procedure: And this was<lb/>by Common Law: such then as to the points in question was the <note>state <add>condition</add> and character<lb/>of the Common Law</note></p>
 
<p> Now then <del>of</del> approving as I do of the conduct of<lb/>men in power so far as concerns the abolition of this point<lb/>of law, what must have been my opinion of their<lb/>conduct in respect <add>relation</add> to those same points down to that time?<lb/><del>What is it that</del> Where is the abomination the existence of which<lb/>they are not prepared to regard <add>either</add> with complacency <del>if</del> <add>or</add> with<lb/>indifference &#x2014; they who <del>for <gap/> <gap/></del> <add>desire to that <unclear>manner</unclear></add> could suffer<lb/> an abomination such as that so desired as point of the law?</p> <p>A system which without any reclamation on the part<lb/>of those best acquainted with it could contain an abomination<lb/>such as that, what are the other abominations which<lb/> it may not with reason be expected <del>be</del> still to offer to<lb/>view were the best eyes disposed to look at them? Yet<lb/>it is with abominations such as those contained in it, that, by the<lb/> <add>unanimous</add> <lb/><!-- continues in margin --> unanimous voice of<lb/>all those who <del>f</del> behold<lb/> their own profit in the<lb/>abuses of it, this system<lb/> has all along been<lb/><del><gap/> and</del> stated the<lb/>perfection of reason, and<lb/> so declared and certified.</p>   


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:11, 17 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Apr. 22.

Radicalism not dangerous
(2) § Rulers disregard
1. Public 2. Appeal

A more compleat demonstration and not be desired
than those who wish for pr radical reform may see
in it of the rustiness imperfection of the Constitution, of the immorality
of the ruling few — at all times of their disregard for justice of
their disregard for the welfare of the subject many, of their
disregard for religion, and of the hypocrisy with which
their professions of regard for it have been accompanied.

[+]
of the depravity of
that part of the rule
of action which [1] is in
the shape of Common
Law

On condition of finding a ruffian a hired assassin who for him
is content to hazard his life in the endeavour to kill
either such an assassin or himself, is another man who
has given him no offence, a man who has no right to
it and is conscious of having no right to it may acquire
an estate to any magnitude. Until the act which passed
t'other day for the abolition of it, this such was a part of
the two, such was the extent of the law of real property,
such was the state of Judicial procedure: And this was
by Common Law: such then as to the points in question was the state condition and character
of the Common Law

Now then of approving as I do of the conduct of
men in power so far as concerns the abolition of this point
of law, what must have been my opinion of their
conduct in respect relation to those same points down to that time?
What is it that Where is the abomination the existence of which
they are not prepared to regard either with complacency if or with
indifference — they who for desire to that manner could suffer
an abomination such as that so desired as point of the law?

A system which without any reclamation on the part
of those best acquainted with it could contain an abomination
such as that, what are the other abominations which
it may not with reason be expected be still to offer to
view were the best eyes disposed to look at them? Yet
it is with abominations such as those contained in it, that, by the
unanimous
unanimous voice of
all those who f behold
their own profit in the
abuses of it, this system
has all along been
and stated the
perfection of reason, and
so declared and certified.



Identifier: | JB/137/253/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-04-22

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

253

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

46970

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in