★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 15<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p> <hi rend="underline">1</hi> 1 <lb/> <note>III Experience<lb/> II Ireland</note><lb/>1 <note>§.1 Historical sketch<lb/>Evidence stated</note></p> <!-- marginal summaries in pencil --> <p><note>1<lb/> III. Experience. II Ireland.<lb/> Parliamentary<lb/>emancipation.<lb/>Years 1777 to 1783.</note></p> <p><del><gap/></del></p> <p>Part III Defence from particular experience in the<lb/>case of Ireland: namely of Irish Parliamentary Emancipation<lb/>in the years from 1777 to 1783.</p> <p><note>2<lb/><del>Proof that</del> <add>State of <unclear>kings</unclear> proved</add> During<lb/> this time. Democratic<lb/> ascendency had place<lb/> 1 Subversion of right of<lb/> property none<lb/> 2. Of competition, none<lb/> 3. Evil preponderant none<lb/> 4. Good <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> much<lb/>tranquillity morality<lb/>felicity matchless<lb/>5 Laws still existing<lb/>and in England as well<lb/>as Ireland acknowledged<lb/> good. <del>passed established</del> <add>enacted</add></note></p> <p>The proof afforded in this case is shortly thus. <add>In Ireland</add><lb/>In <add>and during</add> the five or six years in question, democratic ascendency<lb/>actually had place. <del>The result was</del> The results were<lb/> <del>1 Subversion of the ri</del><lb/>1. Subversion of the right of <del>the people</del> <add>property</add>, none<lb/>2. Subversion of the Constitution, none<lb/> 3. Preponderant <add>or considerable</add> evil in any shape, none<lb/>4. Preponderant <del>evil</del> good in all shapes abundant <add>during the whole time</add> tranquillity,<lb/>morality, felicity <del>altogether without example</del> <add>to a degree much beyond any</add><lb/><del>in that country</del> thing ever exemplified in that country<lb/>before or since</p> <p>5. In particular, laws of the utmost importance enacted<lb/>laws the <del>utility</del> justice and utility in all respects was recognized<lb/> by the Parliament of both countries, and have<lb/>never since been disputed</p> <p><note>3<lb/>6. The official cause<lb/>democratic ascendency<lb/> not democracy. By<lb/>constituted authorities<lb/> every thing done</note></p> <p>6. The <del>means</del> <add>power</add> whereby <del>these <gap/></del> <add> purposes</add> so transcendently <add>beneficial</add> were<lb/>accomplished, <add><del><gap/></del></add> was in strict propriety of expression, democratic<lb/> ascendency. Not <hi rend="underline">democracy</hi>; <add>itself</add> because <add>for</add> the constituted<lb/> authorities continued all of them without exception<lb/>in the full exercise of their functions: <add> and whatsoever was done, even in the framing of <del>these</del> the laws, by <del><gap/></del><lb/><del>their hands that it</del> which those purposes were<lb/><del><gap/> <gap/></del> accomplished it was<lb/>by their hands that<lb/>it was done</add> Yet it was democratic<lb/>ascendency: for the body of the people — <add>among their</add> universal<lb/>suffrage men as many as chose — having met <add>assembling</add> in bodies —<lb/>those bodies <add>were</add> armed and trained — <del><gap/> <gap/></del> formed <add>at Dublin</add> by their<lb/>Deputies in national convention sitting close to the Parliament<lb/> at the same time, with the military power<lb/>of the country <sic>compleatly</sic> at their command, <del>ex</del> and <del>making</del> <add> made known</add><lb/><del>known</del> <add><del><gap/></del> on every subject</add> their wishes to the Parliament. These wishes<lb/> were in a state of <del><gap/></del> <add>known</add> undisputed opposition <add><sic>contrarity</sic></add> to what had from the<lb/><add> <del><gap/> <gap/></del> earliest</add> <lb/> <!-- continues in margin --> earliest been the supposed<lb/> interest and thence<lb/>the wishes of <del>the <gap/></del> all<lb/> English Monarchs, their<lb/>Ministers and Parliaments:<lb/> yet notwithstanding<lb/> <!-- continues along the edge of the page -->cause fulfilled: <del>fulfilled</del> the fulfilment having for its evident cause, the ascendency obtained by the body of the people, and the influence<lb/>which they were thereby enabled to exert and did accordingly exercise on<lb/> the conduct of the government in both countries.</p> <p><note>4<lb/>Still democratic ascendency.<lb/> By democratic influence every<lb/> thing done: by universal<lb/> suffrage men armed<lb/><unclear>formed</unclear> in bodies:<lb/>by their delegates in <gap/><lb/>sitting down in<lb/> Parliament: notorious<lb/> opposition to their <gap/><lb/> English Monarchs <unclear>law</unclear><lb/>Ministers and Parliaments</note></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} |
1820 Jan. 15
Radicalism not dangerous
1 1
III Experience
II Ireland
1 §.1 Historical sketch
Evidence stated
1
III. Experience. II Ireland.
Parliamentary
emancipation.
Years 1777 to 1783.
Part III Defence from particular experience in the
case of Ireland: namely of Irish Parliamentary Emancipation
in the years from 1777 to 1783.
2
Proof that State of kings proved During
this time. Democratic
ascendency had place
1 Subversion of right of
property none
2. Of competition, none
3. Evil preponderant none
4. Good do much
tranquillity morality
felicity matchless
5 Laws still existing
and in England as well
as Ireland acknowledged
good. passed established enacted
The proof afforded in this case is shortly thus. In Ireland
In and during the five or six years in question, democratic ascendency
actually had place. The result was The results were
1 Subversion of the ri
1. Subversion of the right of the people property, none
2. Subversion of the Constitution, none
3. Preponderant or considerable evil in any shape, none
4. Preponderant evil good in all shapes abundant during the whole time tranquillity,
morality, felicity altogether without example to a degree much beyond any
in that country thing ever exemplified in that country
before or since
5. In particular, laws of the utmost importance enacted
laws the utility justice and utility in all respects was recognized
by the Parliament of both countries, and have
never since been disputed
3
6. The official cause
democratic ascendency
not democracy. By
constituted authorities
every thing done
6. The means power whereby these purposes so transcendently beneficial were
accomplished, was in strict propriety of expression, democratic
ascendency. Not democracy; itself because for the constituted
authorities continued all of them without exception
in the full exercise of their functions: and whatsoever was done, even in the framing of these the laws, by
their hands that it which those purposes were
accomplished it was
by their hands that
it was done Yet it was democratic
ascendency: for the body of the people — among their universal
suffrage men as many as chose — having met assembling in bodies —
those bodies were armed and trained — formed at Dublin by their
Deputies in national convention sitting close to the Parliament
at the same time, with the military power
of the country compleatly at their command, ex and making made known
known on every subject their wishes to the Parliament. These wishes
were in a state of known undisputed opposition contrarity to what had from the
earliest
earliest been the supposed
interest and thence
the wishes of the all
English Monarchs, their
Ministers and Parliaments:
yet notwithstanding
cause fulfilled: fulfilled the fulfilment having for its evident cause, the ascendency obtained by the body of the people, and the influence
which they were thereby enabled to exert and did accordingly exercise on
the conduct of the government in both countries.
4
Still democratic ascendency.
By democratic influence every
thing done: by universal
suffrage men armed
formed in bodies:
by their delegates in
sitting down in
Parliament: notorious
opposition to their
English Monarchs law
Ministers and Parliaments
Identifier: | JB/137/265/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1820-01-15 |
1-4 |
||
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
265 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d1 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]] |
||
arthur wellesley, duke of wellington |
|||
1816 |
|||
46982 |
|||