★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto loaded |
No edit summary |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 26<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p><del>11</del><lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>1. United States</note><lb/>2 <note>§3. Conclusive Offer to<lb/>receive U.S. via universality</note></p> <p>3. It is therefore for the <del>ruler in</del> purpose of promoting relief<lb/>in so far as it can be promoted, to and that effect for the<lb/> promoting <add><gap/></add> justice with other reformist, that I should be<lb/>disposed to invoke this sacrifice to call upon my brother <add>the non-<sic>householder</sic> part</add> <lb/>radicalists to join with me in the making of this sacrifice<lb/>for this purpose and not for any other. My actions are in my<lb/> power: my persuasions my opinions are not.</p> <p>If you will not join in <del>re</del> requesting or granting or requesting<lb/> a degree of radicality <add>popularity</add> equal to that which has place<lb/>in the United States, do not <del>state</del> think to avail yourself<lb/> of an objection grounded on the observation that the<lb/>degree of radicality here advocated is different from and<lb/>extending beyond that which has place in the United States</p> <p><del>Will any one have the</del> <add> Among those who <del><gap/></del> reject <del><gap/></del> virtual universality, and</add><lb/> stop at <del><gap/></del> <sic>housholder</sic> suffrage will any one favourer come with<lb/>a reason for the exclusion? Oh no! reasons on that side <lb/>are not so plenty: the <del><gap/></del> combat <add>contest</add> is carried on with more<lb/> compact and commodious weapons: absurd <add>wild and visionary</add> visions are<lb/>senseless. These are the arguments on the side of the anti-<sic>radicalists</sic>:<lb/> these are the arguments on the side of the Tories.<lb/> these are the arguments on the side of the Whigs. Such<lb/>arguments as the nature of the case on the side which they <add>in which they stand</add> <lb/>take affords, such and such only can men <add>they</add> employ.<lb/>Reasons where <add>if</add> it affords reasons: if not then <del>so many</del> <lb/><del><gap/></del> this or that set of empty words: any such one by <add> for which</add><lb/>experience or otherwise they are led to <del>come</del> expect acceptance.</p> <p> But the particular question here is — not concerning ineligibility<lb/>or eligibility upon the whole, but concerning dangerousness or <sic>undangerousness</sic></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}} | ||
1819 Dec. 26
Radicalism not dangerous
11
III Experience
1. United States
2 §3. Conclusive Offer to
receive U.S. via universality
3. It is therefore for the ruler in purpose of promoting relief
in so far as it can be promoted, to and that effect for the
promoting justice with other reformist, that I should be
disposed to invoke this sacrifice to call upon my brother the non-householder part
radicalists to join with me in the making of this sacrifice
for this purpose and not for any other. My actions are in my
power: my persuasions my opinions are not.
If you will not join in re requesting or granting or requesting
a degree of radicality popularity equal to that which has place
in the United States, do not state think to avail yourself
of an objection grounded on the observation that the
degree of radicality here advocated is different from and
extending beyond that which has place in the United States
Will any one have the Among those who reject virtual universality, and
stop at housholder suffrage will any one favourer come with
a reason for the exclusion? Oh no! reasons on that side
are not so plenty: the combat contest is carried on with more
compact and commodious weapons: absurd wild and visionary visions are
senseless. These are the arguments on the side of the anti-radicalists:
these are the arguments on the side of the Tories.
these are the arguments on the side of the Whigs. Such
arguments as the nature of the case on the side which they in which they stand
take affords, such and such only can men they employ.
Reasons where if it affords reasons: if not then so many
this or that set of empty words: any such one by for which
experience or otherwise they are led to come expect acceptance.
But the particular question here is — not concerning ineligibility
or eligibility upon the whole, but concerning dangerousness or undangerousness
|
Identifier: | JB/137/263/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1819-12-26 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
263 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
46980 |
|||
