JB/137/280/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/280/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 18<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p>Hardy 272, 275.</p> <!-- in pencil --> <p>Ii &sect; (*3)<lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(1) 1 <note>(&sect;.2. Democr. ascend<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> established<lb/>Volunteers = Universal<lb/>This not aristocratic</note></p> <p><add>No</add> But says somebody this is not democratic ascendency<lb/>it is rather aristocratic ascendency: for as to what concerns<lb/>property, <add>none but</add> freeholders were admitted: all un-freeholders<lb/>were excluded: and as to what concerns religion, none<lb/>but Protestants were admitted: Catholics were <add>stand</add> excluded.<lb/>and of Catholics four fifths of the population <del>were</del> composed.<lb/>The class of man therefore under whose dominance <add>influence</add> <lb/>all this evil was thus excluded &#x2014;  good or evil whichever<lb/>took place was not the class of men; <del>to whom</del> in<lb/>whose hands your plan places the whole power of the<lb/>country in a word they were all your universal<lb/>suffrage men.  In this <gap/> had all universal<lb/>suffrage men borne a part, who can say what confusion<lb/>and destruction might not have caused? <del><note>&#9758; <gap/> the quotation</note></del></p> <p>1 That the freeholders were not of the number appears<lb/>(it may be added) from <del>Hardy</del> a Resolution of the Convention passed<lb/>unanimously at <add>or</add> the motion of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Flood in which what <note>29 <sic>Nov.</sic> 1783. 268<lb/>House of Commons<lb/>then sitting.</note><lb/>is recommended to be done is recommended to be done<lb/>by the delegates of which <add><unclear>composing</unclear></add> the Convention "in conjunction<lb/>with the other freeholders of their several Counties: here <note>Hardy</note><lb/>then you may see <add>it is <unclear>said</unclear></add> (it may be said) that whatever was<lb/>done it, by the freeholders and them alone that it was<lb/>done.</p> <p> 2. As to the Catholics if M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy is to believed "the delegates <note>Hardy p.275</note><lb/>"did not, nor could they then include the Catholic<lb/>body: for so he says in so many words. p.275.</p>               






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:22, 27 February 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan. 18
Radicalism not dangerous

Hardy 272, 275.

Ii § (*3)
III Experience
II Ireland

(1) 1 (§.2. Democr. ascendy established
Volunteers = Universal
This not aristocratic

No But says somebody this is not democratic ascendency
it is rather aristocratic ascendency: for as to what concerns
property, none but freeholders were admitted: all un-freeholders
were excluded: and as to what concerns religion, none
but Protestants were admitted: Catholics were stand excluded.
and of Catholics four fifths of the population were composed.
The class of man therefore under whose dominance influence
all this evil was thus excluded — good or evil whichever
took place was not the class of men; to whom in
whose hands your plan places the whole power of the
country in a word they were all your universal
suffrage men. In this had all universal
suffrage men borne a part, who can say what confusion
and destruction might not have caused? the quotation

1 That the freeholders were not of the number appears
(it may be added) from Hardy a Resolution of the Convention passed
unanimously at or the motion of Mr Flood in which what 29 Nov. 1783. 268
House of Commons
then sitting.

is recommended to be done is recommended to be done
by the delegates of which composing the Convention "in conjunction
with the other freeholders of their several Counties: here Hardy
then you may see it is said (it may be said) that whatever was
done it, by the freeholders and them alone that it was
done.

2. As to the Catholics if Mr Hardy is to believed "the delegates Hardy p.275
"did not, nor could they then include the Catholic
body: for so he says in so many words. p.275.




Identifier: | JB/137/280/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

280

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

46997

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in