★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- heading and marginal notes in pencil --> | |||
<head>1820 <sic>Feb.</sic> 2<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <p>§.12 <lb/><note>III Experience<lb/>Ireland</note><lb/>(1) <note>Plowden <gap/> in Charlemont</note></p> <p>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Plowden was not <!-- brackets in pencil --> [in a situation <add>in the secret</add> to be in the secret]<lb/><add>in regard to Lord Charlemont</add></p> <p> It is curious to <del><gap/></del> see him mention as matter of <unclear>suspicion</unclear><lb/>what his biographer has revealed to us as certainty, has<lb/>declared to us as part and parcel of his glories. [necessity<lb/>that it was for the express purpose of stopping the people in<lb/>their progress to <del>gi</del> felicity that he <del>got himself</del> placed<lb/>himself at their head.</p> <p><sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic>: 1793 <add>1792</add> Lord Charlemont had declared himself in favour<lb/>of <del>ref<d/el> parliamentary reform — of radical reform — and in<lb/>proof of his sincerity <add>his being so</add> had given the Volunteers to understand that<lb/>he was prepared and willing to give up his seats .. <del>But at</del><lb/><del>the</del> we know from his biographer M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy, that there are all<lb/>the <gap/>: that <add>from the first</add> he was averse to any efficient reform, to any<lb/>reform which among its effects would have the loss of those<lb/>same seats. But to profess himself otherwise than favourable<lb/>to reform would not have been consistent with the plan he had<lb/>formed <add>settled with himself</add> for the defeat of it. <del>When afterwards his coldness for<lb/>reform was noticed, his defence was</del> In this aversion to parliamentary<lb/>reform may be seen the true cause of his <add><gap/></add> apparently<lb/>inconsistent measures — the <add>his</add> opposition to Catholic suffrage<lb/> at one time, and his approbation of it at another<lb/>At the time when he opposed it, the Catholics were predominant<lb/>in the Volunteer association, and the Government unfavourable<lb/>to any such concessions to the Catholics. His fear then<lb/>was lest the Catholics having no hopes from any other<lb/>means should be generally favourable to <add>parliamentary</add> reform — having no<lb/>hope from any other means. But in process of having Government<lb/><add>probably</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1820 Feb. 2
Radicalism not dangerous
§.12
III Experience
Ireland
(1) Plowden in Charlemont
Mr Plowden was not [in a situation in the secret to be in the secret]
in regard to Lord Charlemont
It is curious to see him mention as matter of suspicion
what his biographer has revealed to us as certainty, has
declared to us as part and parcel of his glories. [necessity
that it was for the express purpose of stopping the people in
their progress to gi felicity that he got himself placed
himself at their head.
Ao: 1793 1792 Lord Charlemont had declared himself in favour
of ref<d/el> parliamentary reform — of radical reform — and in
proof of his sincerity his being so had given the Volunteers to understand that
he was prepared and willing to give up his seats .. But at
the we know from his biographer Mr Hardy, that there are all
the : that from the first he was averse to any efficient reform, to any
reform which among its effects would have the loss of those
same seats. But to profess himself otherwise than favourable
to reform would not have been consistent with the plan he had
formed settled with himself for the defeat of it. When afterwards his coldness for
reform was noticed, his defence was In this aversion to parliamentary
reform may be seen the true cause of his apparently
inconsistent measures — the his opposition to Catholic suffrage
at one time, and his approbation of it at another
At the time when he opposed it, the Catholics were predominant
in the Volunteer association, and the Government unfavourable
to any such concessions to the Catholics. His fear then
was lest the Catholics having no hopes from any other
means should be generally favourable to parliamentary reform — having no
hope from any other means. But in process of having Government
probably
|
Identifier: | JB/137/376/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1820-02-02 |
|||
|
137 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
376 |
radicalism not dangerous |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
<…> co |
||
|
a. levy |
|||
|
47093 |
|||
