JB/063/004/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/063/004/004: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:


<p>False distinction between Public &amp; Private Offences<lb/>
<p>False distinction between Public &amp; Private Offences<lb/>
Murrow Manif.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 1825 in I Barn Cheat 315.<lb/>
Burrow Manif.<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> 1825 in I Barn Cheat 315.<lb/>
There is no <del><gap/></del> Private offence that is known is not<lb/>
There is no <del>off</del> Private offence that if known is not<lb/>
Public in it's consequences.  But there is a large<lb/>
Public in it's consequences.  But there is a large<lb/>
class of offences which are Public without being<lb/>
class of offences which are Public without being<lb/>
Private: which will <add>in time</add> or may  come to affect some<lb/>
Private: which will <add>in time</add> or may  come to affect some<lb/>
individuals but which can never be known to affect<lb/>
individuals but which can never be known to affect<lb/>
any ap<gap/>quable individuals in particular.</p>
any assignable individuals in particular.</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>


<p>From the moment [a Trade is declared a Bankrupt]<lb/>
<note>Theft &amp;c.</note><lb/>
on which Bankruptcy is declared to have become commenced<lb/>
<p>From the moment [a Trader is declared a Bankrupt]<lb/>
the goods of the Bankrupt become <add>the property of</add> his Creditors - not<lb/>
on which Bankruptcy is declared to have commenced<lb/>
the goods of the Bankrupt become <add>the property of</add> his Creditors &#x2014; not<lb/>
to give an account of them is therefore Embezzlement<lb/>
to give an account of them is therefore Embezzlement<lb/>
<del>If there be</del> is punis</p>
<del>If there be</del> is punis</p>
Line 28: Line 28:
<p>If then he is punished as much for <del>stealing</del><lb/>
<p>If then he is punished as much for <del>stealing</del><lb/>
embezzling a smaller part as for embezzling a<lb/>
embezzling a smaller part as for embezzling a<lb/>
larger part, if he <del>she</del> embezzled
larger part, if he <del>she</del> embezzles any thing he will embezzle<lb/>
as much as much as</p>
as much as much as he can. <del>with one</del></p>


<p>Wherever a man, steals <add>&amp; o</add> only to make up a<lb/>
<p>Wherever a man, steals <add>&amp;c</add> only to make up a<lb/>
particular sum proportionable punishment will be<lb/>
particular sum proportionable punishment will be<lb/>
of use - This is not the case merely with men if<lb/>
of use - This is not the case merely with men if<lb/>
reflection. It may be with  <hi rend="underline">chardis</hi>, when they want<lb/>
reflection. It may be with  <hi rend="underline">chardis</hi>, when they want<lb/>
any particular thing.</p>
any particular thing.</p>


<p>Stealing from the <hi rend="underline">poor</hi> to be punished more<lb/>
<p>Stealing from the <hi rend="underline">poor</hi> to be punished more<lb/>
than stealing from the <hi rend="underline">rich</hi>.</p>
than stealing from the <hi rend="underline">rich</hi>.</p>
&#x2014;<lb/>


<note>Objection to Consol.<hi rend="superscript">g</hi>.<lb/>
<note>Objection to Consol.<hi rend="superscript">g</hi>.<lb/>
Line 46: Line 45:
to consolidating new provisions into the old<lb/>
to consolidating new provisions into the old<lb/>
Acts is that then the whole becomes new, so that<lb/>
Acts is that then the whole becomes new, so that<lb/>
the party that opposes the new provisions sp<gap/> out<lb/>
the party that opposes the new provisions <unclear>spews</unclear> out<lb/>
the time by declaring the old provisions <hi rend="underline">de novo</hi><lb/>
the time by declaring the old provisions <hi rend="underline">de novo</hi><lb/>
Par Land from Robinson &amp; L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> North.</p>
Per Lind from Robinson &amp; L<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> North.</p>
The remedy would be to make a standing <del>order</del> resolution<lb/>
The remedy would be to make a standing <del>order</del> resolution<lb/>
that it is the opinion of the House that only <del><gap/></del> new provisions<lb/>
that it is the opinion of the House that only <del><gap/></del> new provisions<lb/>
ought to be the subject of debate. But this difficulty<lb/>
ought to be the subject of debate. But this difficulty<lb/>
would be effectually obviated by any method of <add>considering</add><lb/>
would be effectually obviated by any method of <add>considering</add></p>
 
 
 
 


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 14:03, 9 June 2020

Click Here To Edit

C

Ins:
Offences Private
x Public

Miscell.

False distinction between Public & Private Offences
Burrow Manif.d 1825 in I Barn Cheat 315.
There is no off Private offence that if known is not
Public in it's consequences. But there is a large
class of offences which are Public without being
Private: which will in time or may come to affect some
individuals but which can never be known to affect
any assignable individuals in particular.

Theft &c.

From the moment [a Trader is declared a Bankrupt]
on which Bankruptcy is declared to have commenced
the goods of the Bankrupt become the property of his Creditors — not
to give an account of them is therefore Embezzlement
If there be is punis

If then he is punished as much for stealing
embezzling a smaller part as for embezzling a
larger part, if he she embezzles any thing he will embezzle
as much as much as he can. with one

Wherever a man, steals &c only to make up a
particular sum proportionable punishment will be
of use - This is not the case merely with men if
reflection. It may be with chardis, when they want
any particular thing.

Stealing from the poor to be punished more
than stealing from the rich.

Objection to Consol.g.
Acts.

The great objection to consolidating Acts, or rather
to consolidating new provisions into the old
Acts is that then the whole becomes new, so that
the party that opposes the new provisions spews out
the time by declaring the old provisions de novo
Per Lind from Robinson & Ld North.

The remedy would be to make a standing order resolution
that it is the opinion of the House that only new provisions
ought to be the subject of debate. But this difficulty

would be effectually obviated by any method of considering



Identifier: | JB/063/004/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 63.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-28

Box

063

Main Headings

penal code

Folio number

004

Info in main headings field

miscell.

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::gr [crown motif] [britannia with shield motif]]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

20193

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in