JB/159/012/004: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/159/012/004: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<>
 
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/012/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/159/012/004|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>Punishment &amp; Restraint - Warburton</head>
<head>Punishment &amp; Restraint - Warburton</head>
<p>are if they <gap/></p>all approach to one another very dif-
 
-ficult to distinguish , and very easy to <unclear>confound</unclear>
<p>are if they at all approach to one another very difficult to distinguish, and very easy to confound.
The Bishop thinks of "different degrees of pain", as
The Bishop speaks of "different degrees of pain", as
being <hi rend="superscript">either species of </hi> so many restraints <hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi>.<note>11 p. 305.
being <hi rend="superscript">either species of </hi> so many restraints <hi rend="superscript">+</hi>.<note>11 p. 305.
or so many things  
or so many things  
of which restraints are
of which restraints are
species</note> "These different degrees of
species</note> "These different degrees of
"Pain",...says he , "are all equally <hi rend="underline">more Restraints</hi>!!
"Pain",...says he , "are all equally <hi rend="underline">more Restraints</hi>!!
He speaks of other "degrees of pain" as being so
He speaks of other "degrees of pain" as being so
many punishments.<note></note> or else so many
many punishments.<note>or else so many
things of which punish
things of which punishments are species</note> But now extend there pains"
-ments are species</note> But now extend there pains"
.... says he, "they are all Punishments"<note>+ p. 305</note>
.... says he, "they are all Punishments"<note>+ p. 305</note>
In <hi rend="superscript">the course of these </hi><del>saying these</del>observations, he gives us <del>a</del> by way
In <hi rend="superscript">the course of these </hi><del>saying these</del>observations, he gives us <del>a</del> by way
of example a list of four pains which from
of example a list of four pains which from
their proportion <hi rend="superscript">to the <gap/> they are employ'd to combat</hi> and the purpose, they are
their proportion <hi rend="superscript">to the evils they are employ'd to combat</hi> and the purpose, they are
respectively applied to y are restraints and not
respectively applied to y are restraints and not
punishments: he then gives us <hi rend="superscript">another</hi> <del>a</del> list of four
punishments: he then gives us <hi rend="superscript">another</hi> <del>a</del> list of four
pains which besides being restraints are pun-
pains which besides being restraints are punishments.  In short if I understand him that right
-ishments.  In short if I understand him that right
a pain that <hi rend="superscript">"is no more than what is just <unclear>necessary</unclear> to repel"</hi><del>just enough to support</del>the <hi rend="underline">"evil"</hi>
a pain that <hi rend="superscript">"is no more than what is just <unclear>necessary</unclear> to repel"</hi><del>just enough to support</del>the <hi rend="underline">"evil"</hi>
it is employ'd to combat is a restraint. A pain
it is employ'd to combat is a restraint. A pain
Line 28: Line 27:
it is employ'd to combat is a punishment.
it is employ'd to combat is a punishment.
Restraints then as well as <del><gap/></del> Punishment is a species of
Restraints then as well as <del><gap/></del> Punishment is a species of
Pain.
Pain.</p>
<p>'This to my apprehension is what <hi rend="superscript"><unclear>moving</unclear> to <del>from</del> the causes</hi> <del>for the <gap/></del> above stated, makes confusion. To remedy it, I
 
would propose that instead of <gap/> <hi rend="underline">restraint</hi>
<p>'This to my apprehension is what <hi rend="superscript">owing to <del>from</del> the causes</hi> <del>for the <gap/></del> above stated, makes confusion. To remedy it, I
we should use <hi rend="underline">act</hi> of restraint; and instead of pun-
would propose that instead of <del><gap/></del> <hi rend="underline">restraint</hi>
-ishment, <hi rend="underline">act</hi>of punishment. We shall then be
we should use <hi rend="underline">act</hi> of restraint; and instead of punishment, <hi rend="underline">act</hi>of punishment. We shall then be
in a better condition of trying the accuracy of these distinctions.</p>
in a better condition of trying the accuracy of these distinctions.</p>
 
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 16:23, 20 July 2020

Click Here To Edit

Punishment & Restraint - Warburton

are if they at all approach to one another very difficult to distinguish, and very easy to confound. The Bishop speaks of "different degrees of pain", as being either species of so many restraints +.11 p. 305. or so many things of which restraints are species "These different degrees of "Pain",...says he , "are all equally more Restraints!! He speaks of other "degrees of pain" as being so many punishments.or else so many things of which punishments are species But now extend there pains" .... says he, "they are all Punishments"+ p. 305 In the course of these saying theseobservations, he gives us a by way of example a list of four pains which from their proportion to the evils they are employ'd to combat and the purpose, they are respectively applied to y are restraints and not punishments: he then gives us another a list of four pains which besides being restraints are punishments. In short if I understand him that right a pain that "is no more than what is just necessary to repel"just enough to supportthe "evil" it is employ'd to combat is a restraint. A pain that is "more than enough is necessary to repel to support the "evil it is employ'd to combat is a punishment. Restraints then as well as Punishment is a species of Pain.

'This to my apprehension is what owing to from the causes for the above stated, makes confusion. To remedy it, I would propose that instead of restraint we should use act of restraint; and instead of punishment, actof punishment. We shall then be in a better condition of trying the accuracy of these distinctions.




Identifier: | JB/159/012/004"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 159.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

159

Main Headings

punishment

Folio number

012

Info in main headings field

punishment distinguished and defined punishment & restraint warburton importance of the above distinctions

Image

004

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f1 / f2 / f3 / f4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::l v g propatria [britannia motif]]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

caroline vernon

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

53835

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in