JB/137/477/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/477/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 2<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II. Experience</note><lb/>(2) <note>II. Ireland<lb/>After Grattan's Speech</note></p> <p>Of the sort of patriotism or public spirit which in<lb/>the breasts of the aristocracy of Ireland produced <add>contributed to produce</add> that<lb/><del>good effect</del> relief to Ireland which under forms of<lb/>the weakness of government in England were so happily<lb/>produced the short history of it is this</p> <p><add>For Ireland</ad> Four things were needful: 1. free trade <add>freedom of trade</add> 2. emancipation<lb/>of the Irish from the <add>Yoke of the</add> British Parliament. 3.<lb/>emancipation of the Catholic majority of the population<lb/>from the Yoke of the Protestant minority. 4. <!-- brackets in pencil --> [radical]<lb/>parliamentary reform: the three first articles for a temporary<lb/>and partial alleviation: the other for a radical<lb/>cure</p> <p>Of these four measures what was the influence <add>effect</add> in relation<lb/>to the interest of the Aristocracy?  <del><add>Gone</add> of the sound</del><lb/><note>112</note> Of The two first they shared the benefit with the people at<lb/>large.  <del><add>From</add></add> Of the fourth there was p</del> the second was more<lb/>immediately beneficial to them than to the people: from<lb/>subordinate it raised their power to the rank of inference<lb/>3. Collective emancipation.  To the Aristocracy of the Country<lb/>at large <add>in general</add> this was a question which in point of interest <add>self regarding</add><lb/>passion and assertion out of the question made little or no<lb/>difference.</p> <p>Remains parliamentary reform: here then was the<lb/>question on which the interests of the aristocracy and<lb/>those of the vast majority of the people were divided, were<lb/>in truth opposite.  The result was a matter of course. <add>On the two first points</add> They<lb/>gave the people their <add>completely efficient and</add> almost unanimous <del>and <gap/></del> support.<lb/>on the third, they split and were comparatively indifferent.<lb/>on the fourth they cast off the people, <add>opposed them</add> and <del>joined in inflicting</del> <add>concurred in <del>b</del> creating</add><lb/>the people and their cause in the manner that the said history <!-- continues into margin -->of the time presents<lb/>to view.</p>
<head>1819 <sic>Dec.</sic> 2<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>II. Experience</note><lb/>(2) <note>II. Ireland<lb/>After Grattan's Speech</note></p> <p>Of the sort of patriotism or public spirit which in<lb/>the breasts of the aristocracy of Ireland produced <add>contributed to produce</add> short<lb/><del>good effect</del> relief to Ireland which under favour of<lb/>the weakness of government in England were so happily<lb/>produced the short history of it is this</p> <p><add>For Ireland</add> Four things were needful: 1. free trade <add>freedom of trade</add> 2. emancipation<lb/>of the Irish from the <add>Yoke of the</add> British Parliament. 3.<lb/>emancipation of the Catholic majority of the population<lb/>from the Yoke of the Protestant minority. 4. <!-- brackets in pencil --> [radical]<lb/>parliamentary reform: the three first articles for a temporary<lb/>and partial alleviation: the other for a radical<lb/>cure</p> <p>Of these four measures what was the influence <add>effect</add> in relation<lb/>to the interest of the Aristocracy?  <del><add>Gone</add> of the second</del><lb/><note>1, 2</note> Of The two first they shared the benefit with the people at<lb/>large.  <del><add>From</add> Of the fourth there was no p</del> the second was more<lb/>immediately beneficial to them than to the people: from<lb/>subordinate it raised their power to the rank of inference<lb/>3. Collective emancipation.  To the Aristocracy of the Country<lb/>at large <add>in general</add> this was a question which in point of interest <add>self regarding</add><lb/>passion and assertion out of the question made little or no<lb/>difference.</p> <p>Remains parliamentary reform: here then was the<lb/>question on which the interests of the aristocracy and<lb/>those of the vast majority of the people were divided, were<lb/>in truth opposite.  The result was a matter of course. <add>On the two first points</add> They<lb/>gave the people their <add>completely efficient and</add> almost unanimous <del>and <gap/></del> support.<lb/>on the third, they split and were comparatively indifferent.<lb/>on the fourth they cast off the people, <add>opposed them</add> and <del>joined in inflicting</del> <add>concurred in <del>b</del> <unclear>creating</unclear></add><lb/>the people and their cause in the manner that the said history <!-- continues into margin -->of the time presents<lb/>to view.</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:33, 27 July 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Dec. 2
Radicalism not dangerous

II. Experience
(2) II. Ireland
After Grattan's Speech

Of the sort of patriotism or public spirit which in
the breasts of the aristocracy of Ireland produced contributed to produce short
good effect relief to Ireland which under favour of
the weakness of government in England were so happily
produced the short history of it is this

For Ireland Four things were needful: 1. free trade freedom of trade 2. emancipation
of the Irish from the Yoke of the British Parliament. 3.
emancipation of the Catholic majority of the population
from the Yoke of the Protestant minority. 4. [radical]
parliamentary reform: the three first articles for a temporary
and partial alleviation: the other for a radical
cure

Of these four measures what was the influence effect in relation
to the interest of the Aristocracy? Gone of the second
1, 2 Of The two first they shared the benefit with the people at
large. From Of the fourth there was no p the second was more
immediately beneficial to them than to the people: from
subordinate it raised their power to the rank of inference
3. Collective emancipation. To the Aristocracy of the Country
at large in general this was a question which in point of interest self regarding
passion and assertion out of the question made little or no
difference.

Remains parliamentary reform: here then was the
question on which the interests of the aristocracy and
those of the vast majority of the people were divided, were
in truth opposite. The result was a matter of course. On the two first points They
gave the people their completely efficient and almost unanimous and support.
on the third, they split and were comparatively indifferent.
on the fourth they cast off the people, opposed them and joined in inflicting concurred in b creating
the people and their cause in the manner that the said history of the time presents
to view.




Identifier: | JB/137/477/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-12-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

477

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47194

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in