JB/137/356/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/356/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Jan</sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note> (3) <note>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>This system of universal <add><gap/></add> <gap/> of which he was so<lb/>sure, by which hands was it to be established?  Catholics<lb/>who had <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del> part taken in the voluntary system<lb/>had taken a part, and those who had taken none. <del>Who</del><Lb/.These being taken into account not many surely would<lb/be left to add to it.</p> <p>Of those who had taken no <add>such</add> part to <gap/> with<lb/>his <gap/> <add><gap/.</add> <gap/> to give this testimony.  "The conduct <note>p.364</note><lb/>"of the Roman Catholics for a length of time, except those<lb/>"<del>who</del> concerned in this business, had been so respectable that<lb/>"it seemed harsh to mention any thing adverse to them: <lb/>"but the objection is to their numbers."  Thus far his Lordship<lb/>"Except those concerned in this business" &#x2014; well and <del>ho</del><lb/>what had this <gap/> been?  Answer according to his Lordship<lb/>on account of the matter still more respectable:<lb/>still more admirable; in a still greater degree entitling<lb/>them to confidence.  With the exception of such of them as<lb/>had <del>were</del> been received into the number of the associated<lb/>and armed volunteers they had been unarmed, <sic>unassociated,</sic><lb/> <add>powerless</add> defenceless <del>helpless,/del>  If in this situation their <sic>peaceableness</sic><lb/>given then a title <add.<gap/><?Add> to confidence, how much stronger a title<lb/>had they acquired when after their having the whole country<lb/>at their command they had still remained submissive?</p>
<head>1820 <sic>Jan</sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/> (3) <note>Sheffield against Reform</note></p> <p>This system of universal <add>mutual</add> <unclear>destruction</unclear> of which he was so<lb/>sure, by which hands was it to be established?  Catholics<lb/>who had <del><gap/> <add><gap/></add></del> part taken in the voluntary system<lb/>had taken a part, and those who had taken none. <del>When</del><lb/>These being taken into account not many surely would<lb/>be left to add to it.</p> <p>Of those who had taken no <add>such</add> part he proceeds with<lb/>his usual <add>accustomed</add> candour to give this testimony.  "The conduct <note>p.364</note><lb/>"of the Roman Catholics for a length of time, except those<lb/>"<del>who</del> concerned in this business, had been so respectable that<lb/>"it seemed harsh to mention any thing adverse to them: <lb/>"but the objection is to their numbers."  Thus far his Lordship<lb/>"Except those concerned in this business" &#x2014; well and <del>ho</del><lb/>what had their conduct been?  Answer according to his Lordship<lb/>on account of the matter still more respectable:<lb/>still more admirable; in a still greater degree entitling<lb/>them to confidence.  With the exception of such of them as<lb/>had <del>were</del> been received into the number of the associated<lb/>and armed volunteers, they had been unarmed, <sic>unassociated,</sic><lb/> <add>powerless</add> defenceless <del>helpless</del>  If in this situation their <sic>peaceableness</sic><lb/>gave them a title <add>claim</add> to confidence, how much stronger a title<lb/>had they acquired when after their having the whole country<lb/>at their command they had still remained submissive?</p>






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 13:40, 7 August 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan 19
Radicalism not dangerous

III Experience
II Ireland

(3) Sheffield against Reform

This system of universal mutual destruction of which he was so
sure, by which hands was it to be established? Catholics
who had part taken in the voluntary system
had taken a part, and those who had taken none. When
These being taken into account not many surely would
be left to add to it.

Of those who had taken no such part he proceeds with
his usual accustomed candour to give this testimony. "The conduct p.364
"of the Roman Catholics for a length of time, except those
"who concerned in this business, had been so respectable that
"it seemed harsh to mention any thing adverse to them:
"but the objection is to their numbers." Thus far his Lordship
"Except those concerned in this business" — well and ho
what had their conduct been? Answer according to his Lordship
on account of the matter still more respectable:
still more admirable; in a still greater degree entitling
them to confidence. With the exception of such of them as
had were been received into the number of the associated
and armed volunteers, they had been unarmed, unassociated,
powerless defenceless helpless If in this situation their peaceableness
gave them a title claim to confidence, how much stronger a title
had they acquired when after their having the whole country
at their command they had still remained submissive?




Identifier: | JB/137/356/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

356

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47073

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in