JB/137/336/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/336/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Jan.<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 27<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>&sect;.9<lb/> <note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/> (3) (1) <note>Plans for Charlemont<lb/>3. Volunteers Military</note></p> <p>Hardy p. <del>270</del> 276. 257 279.</p> <p>2. Subordinate pretence in proof of the <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> dangerousness<lb/>and eventual mischievousness &#x2014; <!-- brackets in pencil --> [the] interference of military<lb/>power.</p> <p>In <add>The</add> proof of the <del><gap/></del> shallowness of the pretence &#x2014; of the<lb/>insincerity of those <add>all</add> who urged it many words can not be<lb/>necessary.  Military <add>forsooth</add. the power of the Convention &#x2014; "military<lb/>the origin of the Association.!</p> <p>Under a Constitution <add>form of Government</add> such as the British what is<lb/>it that makes military power an engine of mischief,<lb/>and as such an object of such dread of such jealousy and<lb/>apprehension?  What, but that, in the hands of the Monarch, <del>where</del> of whose <add>his</add> interests the preponderant one is in<lb/>a state of irreconcilable hostility to that of the people<lb/>any how military power under his command is<lb/>an instrument of mischief upon the most comprehensive<lb/>scale an instrument of despotic power and irremediable<lb/>misrule, an instrument ready at all times<lb/>to be employed as so lately we have seen and felt<lb/>it to be employed against the people.  <del>For</del></p> <p>Now suppose "the whole people armed <add>in arms</add> and at the<lb/>same time in harmony with each other, as <deli</del> in the<lb/>United States they have always been &#x2014; as in Ireland<lb/>itself that seat of former turbulence they had at that<lb/>time been for four years or more &#x2014; in whose hands<lb?>could it be an engine of mischief &#x2014; against what<lb/>part of the people would it have been employed?</p>   
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 27<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- in pencil --> <p>&sect;.9<lb/> <note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/> (3) (1) <note>Plans for Charlemont<lb/>3. Volunteers Military</note></p> <p>Hardy p. <del>270</del> 276. 257 279.</p> <p>2. Subordinate pretence in proof of the <add><sic>alledged</sic></add> dangerousness<lb/>and eventual mischievousness &#x2014; <!-- brackets in pencil --> [the] interference of military<lb/>power.</p> <p>In <add>The</add> proof of the <del><gap/></del> shallowness of the pretence &#x2014; of the<lb/>insincerity of those <add>all</add> who urged it many words can not be<lb/>necessary.  Military <add>forsooth</add> the power of the Convention &#x2014; "military<lb/>the origin of the Association.!</p> <p>Under a Constitution <add>form of Government</add> such as the British what is<lb/>it that makes military power an engine of mischief,<lb/>and as such an object of just dread of just jealousy and<lb/>apprehension?  What, but that, in the hands of the Monarch,<lb/><del>where</del> of whose <add>his</add> interests the preponderant one is in<lb/>a state of irreconcilable hostility to that of the people<lb/>any <del>how</del> military power under his command is<lb/>an instrument of mischief upon the most comprehensive<lb/>scale an instrument of despotic power and irremediable<lb/>misrule, an instrument ready at all times<lb/>to be employed as so lately we have seen and felt<lb/>it to be employed against the people.  <del>For</del></p> <p>Now suppose "the whole people armed <add>in arms</add> and at the<lb/>same time in harmony with each other, as <del>I</del> in the<lb/>United States they have always been &#x2014; as in Ireland<lb/>itself that seat of former turbulence they had at that<lb/>time been for four years or more &#x2014; in whose hands<lb/>could it be an engine of mischief &#x2014; against what<lb/>part of the people would it have been employed?</p>   






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 15:28, 7 August 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan.y 27
Radicalism not dangerous

§.9
III Experience
II Ireland

(3) (1) Plans for Charlemont
3. Volunteers Military

Hardy p. 270 276. 257 279.

2. Subordinate pretence in proof of the alledged dangerousness
and eventual mischievousness — [the] interference of military
power.

In The proof of the shallowness of the pretence — of the
insincerity of those all who urged it many words can not be
necessary. Military forsooth the power of the Convention — "military
the origin of the Association.!

Under a Constitution form of Government such as the British what is
it that makes military power an engine of mischief,
and as such an object of just dread of just jealousy and
apprehension? What, but that, in the hands of the Monarch,
where of whose his interests the preponderant one is in
a state of irreconcilable hostility to that of the people
any how military power under his command is
an instrument of mischief upon the most comprehensive
scale an instrument of despotic power and irremediable
misrule, an instrument ready at all times
to be employed as so lately we have seen and felt
it to be employed against the people. For

Now suppose "the whole people armed in arms and at the
same time in harmony with each other, as I in the
United States they have always been — as in Ireland
itself that seat of former turbulence they had at that
time been for four years or more — in whose hands
could it be an engine of mischief — against what
part of the people would it have been employed?




Identifier: | JB/137/336/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

336

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47053

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in