JB/137/364/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/364/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 21<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(2) <note>Hardy against reform</note></p> <p>A military reform: true a reform brought about by<lb/>the influence of the military.  But by what military?<lb/>By a military under the absolute command of a Monarch<lb/>or the independent command of their own leaders?  No:<lb/>but the people freely associated from all ranks without<lb/>distinction a fair sample of <add>the</add> universal suffrage-men<lb/><del>from the</del> all over the country: in a word the very body<lb/>of men in favour of alien conduct we have seen <add>been seeing</add> from<lb/>his own pen such unqualified and as far as appears <add>there seems no reason to doubt</add><lb/>heartfelt, the very body of men by whom so much good<lb/>had been done and not the least pocket of mischief <add>evil</add> in<lb/>any shape.  These men the <hi rend="underline">military</hi> indeed!  Oh what<lb/>a sad abuse of words! Oh what a transparent fallacy<lb/>so long as the business they were doing was more the business<lb/>of the ruling few than that of the many then they were the<lb/>people and every thing that was admirable: no sooner did<lb/>they proceed to do that which though <add>beneficial to</add> the business of both was<lb/>more so to the subject among them <del>the</del> to the ruling few <note>[+] and thus by exactly<lb/>the same means</note><lb/>then they were to be characterized by a word employed to represent them as instruments of despotism.</p>     
<head>1820 <sic>Jan.</sic> 21<lb/>Radicalism not dangerous</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>III Experience<lb/>II Ireland</note><lb/>(2) <note>Hardy against reform</note></p> <p>A military reform: true a reform brought about by<lb/>the influence of the military.  But by what military?<lb/>By a military under the absolute command of a Monarch<lb/>or the independent command of their own leaders?  No:<lb/>but the people freely associated from all ranks without<lb/>distinction a fair sample of <add>the</add> universal suffrage-men<lb/><del>from the</del> all over the country: in a word the very body<lb/>of men in favour of alien conduct we have seen <add>been seeing</add> from<lb/>his own pen such unqualified and as far as appears <add>there seems no reason to doubt</add><lb/>heartfelt, the very body of men by whom so much good<lb/>had been done and not the least pocket of mischief <add>evil</add> in<lb/>any shape.  These men the <hi rend="underline">military</hi> indeed!  Oh what<lb/>a sad abuse of words! Oh what a transparent fallacy<lb/>So long as the business they were doing was more the business<lb/>of the ruling few than that of the many then they were the<lb/>people and every thing that was admirable: no sooner did<lb/>they proceed to do that which though <add>beneficial to</add> the business of both was<lb/>more so to the subject many than <del>the</del> to the ruling few <note>[+] and this by exactly<lb/>the same means</note><lb/>then they were to be characterized by a word employed<lb/> to represent them as instruments of despotism.</p>     






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 09:49, 10 August 2020

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan. 21
Radicalism not dangerous

III Experience
II Ireland

(2) Hardy against reform

A military reform: true a reform brought about by
the influence of the military. But by what military?
By a military under the absolute command of a Monarch
or the independent command of their own leaders? No:
but the people freely associated from all ranks without
distinction a fair sample of the universal suffrage-men
from the all over the country: in a word the very body
of men in favour of alien conduct we have seen been seeing from
his own pen such unqualified and as far as appears there seems no reason to doubt
heartfelt, the very body of men by whom so much good
had been done and not the least pocket of mischief evil in
any shape. These men the military indeed! Oh what
a sad abuse of words! Oh what a transparent fallacy
So long as the business they were doing was more the business
of the ruling few than that of the many then they were the
people and every thing that was admirable: no sooner did
they proceed to do that which though beneficial to the business of both was
more so to the subject many than the to the ruling few [+] and this by exactly
the same means

then they were to be characterized by a word employed
to represent them as instruments of despotism.




Identifier: | JB/137/364/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-21

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

364

Info in main headings field

radicalism not dangerous

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47081

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in