JB/137/403/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/403/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 30<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>42<lb/><note>II Experience</note><lb/> (3) 3 <note>II. Ireland</note></p> <p><note>This from Hardy.<lb/>Hardy not partial to<lb/>democratic ascendency.<lb/>By his hero, democratic<lb/>ascendency dissolved.<lb/><sic>Monarchico</sic>-Aristocratical<lb/>reinstated.</note></p> <p.<note>Of the <add>Dublin</add> Convention, of<lb/>Delegates from the Associated<lb/>bodies, Charlemont<lb/>was President.<lb/><sic>Parl.</sic> Reform proposed<lb/>[<gap/> ?] he procured<lb/>adjournment</note></p> <p><del>For</del> <add>As to the proof</add> Of these several propositions, it is drawn chiefly<lb/>from Hardy's Life of the Earl of Charlemont. <!-- additions in pencil --> <add>B Thus</add> A circumstance<lb/><add>by which it is</add> <del>that</del> preserves it effectually <add>preserved</add> from the imputation or suspicion<lb/>of partiality on the side of democratic ascendency, is<lb/>that, by <del>ill</del> the account given of the matter by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>Hardy, his most intimate friend, in the putting <add>dissolution of</add> a period <!-- additions in pencil --><add>an end</add><lb/> <add><gap/> down</add> to democratic ascendency and <add>dissolved</add> the restoration thus given<lb/>to <sic>Monarchico</sic>-Aristocratical ascendency, this head<lb/>of the Whig party in Ireland was the principal agent <add>actor</add>.<lb/>The Convention at Dublin was formed <add>composed of</add> Delegates, elected<lb/>by the several bodies of associated Volunteers in different<lb/>parts of the Country. <add>Of this Convention Lord</add> Charlemont was President. <!-- brackets in pencil -->  [When<lb/>they went upon] No sooner did they enter upon the subject<lb/>of Parliamentary Reform than he prevailed for the<lb/>adjournment of the meeting: after which; the Aristocratical <add>Aristocracy</add><lb/><del>confederacy</del> of the Country, having <add>by means of the people</add> effected their object &#x2014; the<lb/>emancipating their power from that of <del>the</del> Great Britain,<lb/>the interest <del>of which</del> of the people was <add>deserted and</add. betrayed, and those<lb/>who continued to support it left to perish by the <gap/><lb/>or by the sword.</p>   
<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 30<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p>42<lb/><note>II Experience</note><lb/> (3) 3 <note>II. Ireland</note></p> <p><note>7<lb/>This from Hardy.<lb/>Hardy not partial to<lb/>democratic ascendency.<lb/>By his hero, democratic<lb/>ascendency dissolved.<lb/><sic>Monarchico</sic>-Aristocratical<lb/>reinstated.</note></p> <p><note>Of the <add>Dublin</add> Convention, of<lb/>Delegates from the Associated<lb/>bodies, Charlemont<lb/>was President.<lb/><sic>Parl.</sic> Reform proposed<lb/>[<unclear>Leinster</unclear>?] he procured<lb/>adjournment</note></p> <p><del>For</del> <add>As to the proof</add> Of these several propositions, it is drawn chiefly<lb/>from Hardy's Life of the Earl of Charlemont. <!-- additions in pencil --> <add>B Thus</add> A circumstance<lb/><add>by which it is</add> <del>that</del> preserves it effectually <add>preserved</add> from the imputation or suspicion<lb/>of partiality on the side of democratic ascendency, is<lb/>that, by <del>ill</del> the account given of the matter by M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>Hardy, his most intimate friend, in the putting <add>dissolution of</add> a period <!-- additions in pencil --><add>an <unclear>card</unclear></add><lb/> <add>put down</add> to democratic ascendency and <add>dissolved</add> the restoration thus given<lb/>to <sic>Monarchico</sic>-Aristocratical ascendency, this head<lb/>of the Whig party in Ireland was the principal agent <add>actor</add>.<lb/>The Convention at Dublin was formed <add>composed of</add> Delegates, elected<lb/>by the several bodies of associated Volunteers in different<lb/>parts of the Country. <add>Of this Convention Lord</add> Charlemont was President. <!-- brackets in pencil -->  [When<lb/>they went upon] No sooner did they enter upon the subject<lb/>of Parliamentary Reform than he prevailed for the<lb/>adjournment of the meeting: after which; the Aristocratical <add>Aristocracy</add><lb/><del>confederacy</del> of the Country, having <add>by means of the people</add> effected their object &#x2014; the<lb/>emancipating their power from that of <del>the</del> Great Britain,<lb/>the interest <del>of which</del> of the people was <add>deserted and</add> betrayed, and those<lb/>who continued to support it left to perish by the leather<lb/>or by the sword.</p> <p><note>8<lb/><add>The</add> Aristocracy having<lb/>by means of the people<lb/>obtained its own object<lb/> and that (frustrated)<lb/>which was so alike<lb/>to both, deserted them<lb/>of course when that<lb/>reform was proposed<lb/>of which the benefit<lb/>would have been <del>de</del><lb/>reaped by the <del>people</del> <Add>many</add><lb/>at the expense of the<lb/>few.</note></p> <p>The people <del>got</del> obtained relaxation from the restrictions that had<lb/>been imposed on their trade by English tyranny: for by that too<lb/>the benefit was shared in at least an equal degree by their <add>these</add><lb/>aristocratical supporters.  But, as to <del>catholic</del> liberation of degrading<lb/>exclusions on the score of religion, no: Charlemont was<lb/>averse to it.</p>     






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:38, 10 August 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Nov. 30
Radicalism not

42
II Experience
(3) 3 II. Ireland

7
This from Hardy.
Hardy not partial to
democratic ascendency.
By his hero, democratic
ascendency dissolved.
Monarchico-Aristocratical
reinstated.

Of the Dublin Convention, of
Delegates from the Associated
bodies, Charlemont
was President.
Parl. Reform proposed
[Leinster?] he procured
adjournment

For As to the proof Of these several propositions, it is drawn chiefly
from Hardy's Life of the Earl of Charlemont. B Thus A circumstance
by which it is that preserves it effectually preserved from the imputation or suspicion
of partiality on the side of democratic ascendency, is
that, by ill the account given of the matter by Mr
Hardy, his most intimate friend, in the putting dissolution of a period an card
put down to democratic ascendency and dissolved the restoration thus given
to Monarchico-Aristocratical ascendency, this head
of the Whig party in Ireland was the principal agent actor.
The Convention at Dublin was formed composed of Delegates, elected
by the several bodies of associated Volunteers in different
parts of the Country. Of this Convention Lord Charlemont was President. [When
they went upon] No sooner did they enter upon the subject
of Parliamentary Reform than he prevailed for the
adjournment of the meeting: after which; the Aristocratical Aristocracy
confederacy of the Country, having by means of the people effected their object — the
emancipating their power from that of the Great Britain,
the interest of which of the people was deserted and betrayed, and those
who continued to support it left to perish by the leather
or by the sword.

8
The Aristocracy having
by means of the people
obtained its own object
and that (frustrated)
which was so alike
to both, deserted them
of course when that
reform was proposed
of which the benefit
would have been de
reaped by the people many
at the expense of the
few.

The people got obtained relaxation from the restrictions that had
been imposed on their trade by English tyranny: for by that too
the benefit was shared in at least an equal degree by their these
aristocratical supporters. But, as to catholic liberation of degrading
exclusions on the score of religion, no: Charlemont was
averse to it.




Identifier: | JB/137/403/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-11-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-8

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

403

Info in main headings field

radicalism not

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c3 / d42 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1818]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1818

Notes public

ID Number

47120

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in