JB/137/396/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/396/001: Difference between revisions

Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
TB Editor (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p><del>A</del> C<lb/>II. Experience</note><lb/>4 <note><gap/> British</note></p> <!-- in pencil --><p><note>9 or 1<lb/><gap/> if reform<lb/>recommended <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1794<lb/> by <del>Earl</del> Grey, Peoples<lb/>Resolutions in bodies<lb/>acting in Housing prudence:<lb/>i.e. what was<lb/>done in Ireland <add>but</add> 111 years<lb/>before.  With Charlemont<lb/>English Whigs were in<lb/>close correspondence<lb/>as per Hardy's extracts.</note></p> <p>&#9758; + Give the civil words &#9758; This after the <unclear><hi rend="underline">Resolution</hi></unclear><lb/>&#9758; After the <gap/>.</p> <p>+ Resolutions of the people, making in bodies and acting in<lb/>the prudence of the House.  This, as every body knows<lb/>was the plan of operation recommended by <add>the now</add> Earl Grey then<lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Grey M.P. in 1794.  From what has been just<lb/>brought to view, whatever may remain in the <gap/>, <del><gap/></del><lb/>may now receive sufficient illustration <add>an explanation</add>, but more than<lb/>eleven years before had the aura of democratic ascendency<lb/><note>With the Earl of<lb/>Charlemont they had<lb/.all along been in<lb/>instant connection<lb/>as the correspondence<lb/>published in this<lb/>best of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy<lb/><Sic>shews</sic></note><lb/>terminated as above in Ireland. <gap/> and <gap/> was<lb/>the recollection of it in the minds of himself and all the<lb/>other Whig leaders associated under the <sic>stile</sic> and <del><gap/></del> <sic>lable</sic><lb/>of Friends of the people.  What then was that which they<lb/>recommended to be done?  Exactly what they had all<lb/>seen done in Ireland.  Arms were not mentioned,<lb/>for to what good purpose were they mentioned.  In these days<lb/>the matter the right of asking, if tracing is of making in<lb/>bodies of any number was questioned.  Arming for self<lb/>defence was then mentioned even by Blackstone, <gap/><lb/>and without hesitation in any shape, as <add>as are</add> the number of<lb/>an Englishman's undisputed and indispensable rights.</p>  <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>Of arms no <add>express</add> mention,<lb/>no need of it.  arming<lb/>for self defence was<lb/>per Blackstone among<lb/>peoples rights.</note></p> <p><note>10 or 2<lb/>Thus are <sic>shewn</sic><lb/> Grey and Co's proposed<lb/><del>measures</del> means.<lb/>So there could: <gap/><lb/>into power <del>by</del> on<lb/>shoulders of people<lb/>as on a ladder: then<lb/>kicking down the ladder,<lb/>leaving the people with<lb/>no other than a change<lb/>of tyrants</note></p> <p>Such then were the measures which it was in their intention<lb/>to pursue, and which they accordingly recommended.</p> <p>Those measures being the means to some end, what<lb/>then was that end?  Nothing as to this point, does the history<lb/>of the time have as at a loss. <add>as above brought to view</add>  On the shoulders of the<lb/>people, <!-- addition in pencil --> <add>as in a ladder</add> in England as in Ireland they hoped to cheat into<lb/>pains:  that summit attained, in England as in Ireland<lb/>they meant to crush the people to pour down upon the<lb/>people to press down the people with the weight of their <add>this</add><lb/>power, leaving the people under the same tyranny with<lb/>no other change than a change of tyrants.</p>                           
<head>1819 <sic>Nov.</sic> 19<lb/>Radicalism not</head> <!-- marginal note in pencil --> <p>+ C<lb/><note>II. Experience</note><lb/>4 <note>II British</note></p> <!-- in pencil --><p><note>9 or 1<lb/>Instruments of reform<lb/>recommended <sic>A<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 1794<lb/> by <del>Earl</del> Grey, Peoples<lb/>Resolutions in bodies<lb/>acting in Houses prudence:<lb/>i.e. what was<lb/>done in Ireland <add>but</add> 111 years<lb/>before.  With Charlemont<lb/>English Whigs were in<lb/>close correspondence<lb/>as per Hardy's extracts.</note></p> <p>&#9758; + Give the civil words &#9758; This after the <unclear><hi rend="underline">Resolution</hi></unclear><lb/>&#9758; After the Resolutions.</p> <p>+ Resolutions of the people, making in bodies and acting in<lb/>the prudence of the House.  This, as every body knows<lb/>was the plan of operation recommended by <add>the now</add> Earl Grey, then<lb/>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi>. Grey M.P. in 1794.  From what has been just<lb/>brought to view, whatever may remain in the shade, <del><gap/></del><lb/>may now receive sufficient illustration <add>its explanation</add>, but more than<lb/>eleven years before had the aura of democratic ascendency<lb/><note>With the Earl of<lb/>Charlemont they had<lb/>all along been in<lb/>instant connection<lb/>as the correspondence<lb/>published in this<lb/>best of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Hardy<lb/><Sic>shews</sic></note><lb/>terminated as above in Ireland. Fresh and strong was<lb/>the recollection of it in the minds of himself and all the<lb/>other Whig leaders associated under the <sic>stile</sic> and <del><gap/></del> <sic>lable</sic><lb/>of Friends of the people.  What then was that which they<lb/>recommended to be done?  Exactly what they had all<lb/>seen done in Ireland.  Arms were not mentioned,<lb/>for to what good purpose were they mentioned.  In these days<lb/>the matter the right of arming, <add>as</add> if arming as if making in<lb/>bodies of any number was questioned.  Arming for self<lb/>defence was then mentioned even by Blackstone, arming<lb/>and without hesitation in any shape, in <add>that are</add> the number of<lb/>an Englishman's undisputed and indispensable rights.</p>  <!-- marginal notes in pencil --> <p><note>Of arms no <add>express</add> mention,<lb/>no need of it.  arming<lb/>for self defence was<lb/>per Blackstone among<lb/>peoples rights.</note></p> <p><note>10 or 2<lb/>Thus are <sic>shewn</sic><lb/> Grey and Co's proposed<lb/><del>measures</del> means.<lb/>So <unclear>there could</unclear>: mounting<lb/>into power <del>by</del> on<lb/>shoulders of people<lb/>as on a ladder: then<lb/>kicking down the ladder,<lb/>leaving the people with<lb/>no other than a change<lb/>of tyrants</note></p> <p>Such then were the measures which it was in their intention<lb/>to pursue, and which they accordingly recommended.</p> <p>Those measures being the means to some end, what<lb/>then was that end?  Nothing as to this point, does the history<lb/>of the time have as at a loss. <add>as above brought to view</add>  On the shoulders of the<lb/>people, <!-- addition in pencil --> <add>as on a ladder</add> in England as in Ireland they hoped to climb into<lb/><unclear>parts</unclear>:  that summit attained, in England as in Ireland<lb/>they meant to crush the people to pour down upon the<lb/>people to press down the people with the weight of their <add>this</add><lb/>power, leaving the people under the same tyranny with<lb/>no other change than a change of tyrants.</p>                           






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Completed}}

Latest revision as of 12:53, 14 September 2020

Click Here To Edit

1819 Nov. 19
Radicalism not

+ C
II. Experience
4 II British

9 or 1
Instruments of reform
recommended Ao 1794
by Earl Grey, Peoples
Resolutions in bodies
acting in Houses prudence:
i.e. what was
done in Ireland but 111 years
before. With Charlemont
English Whigs were in
close correspondence
as per Hardy's extracts.

☞ + Give the civil words ☞ This after the Resolution
☞ After the Resolutions.

+ Resolutions of the people, making in bodies and acting in
the prudence of the House. This, as every body knows
was the plan of operation recommended by the now Earl Grey, then
Mr. Grey M.P. in 1794. From what has been just
brought to view, whatever may remain in the shade,
may now receive sufficient illustration its explanation, but more than
eleven years before had the aura of democratic ascendency
With the Earl of
Charlemont they had
all along been in
instant connection
as the correspondence
published in this
best of Mr Hardy
shews

terminated as above in Ireland. Fresh and strong was
the recollection of it in the minds of himself and all the
other Whig leaders associated under the stile and lable
of Friends of the people. What then was that which they
recommended to be done? Exactly what they had all
seen done in Ireland. Arms were not mentioned,
for to what good purpose were they mentioned. In these days
the matter the right of arming, as if arming as if making in
bodies of any number was questioned. Arming for self
defence was then mentioned even by Blackstone, arming
and without hesitation in any shape, in that are the number of
an Englishman's undisputed and indispensable rights.

Of arms no express mention,
no need of it. arming
for self defence was
per Blackstone among
peoples rights.

10 or 2
Thus are shewn
Grey and Co's proposed
measures means.
So there could: mounting
into power by on
shoulders of people
as on a ladder: then
kicking down the ladder,
leaving the people with
no other than a change
of tyrants

Such then were the measures which it was in their intention
to pursue, and which they accordingly recommended.

Those measures being the means to some end, what
then was that end? Nothing as to this point, does the history
of the time have as at a loss. as above brought to view On the shoulders of the
people, as on a ladder in England as in Ireland they hoped to climb into
parts: that summit attained, in England as in Ireland
they meant to crush the people to pour down upon the
people to press down the people with the weight of their this
power, leaving the people under the same tyranny with
no other change than a change of tyrants.




Identifier: | JB/137/396/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1819-11-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

9 or 1 - 10 or 2

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

396

Info in main headings field

radicalism not

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

47113

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in